On 2021-05-03 20:44:31, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2021-05-03 20:27:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Interestingly, it seems that the machine indeed doesn't go to sleep: it
>> loops over a failure to sleep and fills up syslog with errors as long as
>> it's trying to sleep, pretty catastro
On 2021-05-03 20:27:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> Interestingly, it seems that the machine indeed doesn't go to sleep: it
> loops over a failure to sleep and fills up syslog with errors as long as
> it's trying to sleep, pretty catastrophic, from a battery usage
> perspective.
>
> I attach t
On 2021-05-03 07:37:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: found -1 5.10.24-1
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Hi Antoine
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine B
Dixi quod…
>So, setjmp/longjmp in klibc save f1/f3/f5/f7 (as shown on Wikipedia
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calling_convention#IBM_System/360_and_successors
>“the z/Architecture ABI,[11] used in Linux” a page down), while
>glibc’s save f8–f15 instead.
Jessica Clarke brought out docs saying f8‥
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 988027 src:mksh
Bug #988027 [libklibc-dev] klibc: sigsetjmp ignores second argument, siglongjmp
always restores signals
Added indication that 988027 affects src:mksh
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Package: libklibc-dev
Version: 2.0.8-6
Severity: serious
Justification: spec violation, affecting release architectures
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@debian.org
Found during debugging of #943425:
- usr/include/setjmp.h
struct __sigjmp_buf {
jmp_buf __jmpbuf;
sigset_t
retitle 943425 klibc: [s390x] setjmp/longjmp do not save/restore all registers
in use
# because this affects a release architecture
severity 943425 serious
thanks
Recapping for the benefit of d-s390@l.d.o:
> The code in question (where it crashes) is thus:
>1607 */
>160
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 943425 klibc: [s390x] setjmp/longjmp do not save/restore all
> registers in use
Bug #943425 [libklibc-dev] klibc: [s390x] SIGSEGV in mksh testcase funsub-2
Changed Bug title to 'klibc: [s390x] setjmp/longjmp do not save/restore all
regis
Package: libklibc-dev
Version: 2.0.8-6
Followup-For: Bug #943425
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@debian.org
I am able to track this down on the porterbox zelenka.
$ apt-get source mksh
$ cd mksh-59c
$ mkdir -p build/klibc
$ cd build/klibc
$ cp /usr/lib/klibc/bin/mksh .
$ chmod +x mksh # because the x attrib
Hi Peter,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 05:32:19PM +0200, Peter Leipold wrote:
> Hi, I'm the original reporter. FYI, the problem was fixed with one of the
> kernel updates on last summer. It's stable since then.
Thanks for reporting back!
Regards,
Salvatore
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #987598 (http://bugs.debian.org/987598
Hallo Salvatore,
Am 02.05.21 um 15:00 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream.
Was there some further progress/clarification from upstream?
I just tested with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 to no avail and reported
the result upstream / asked for any update
Source: linux
Version: 5.10.28-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Debian installer for bullseye fails to find any disks for installation
due to a missing module for virtio block device. Merge request for
including virtio_blk (and other standard scsi modules) is here:
https://salsa.debian.org/ke
On 2021-05-03 07:37:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: found -1 5.10.24-1
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Hi Antoine
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine B
Hi Salvatore,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Doing some maintenance on open bugs for src:linux to bring unnecessary
> still open bugs down, this one appeared as well on the radar of older
> bugs for older kernels.
>
> Do you still want to keep this bug ope
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2021 12:47:03 +0200
with message-id <82898247-7c4c-2e2c-358a-5724ce5fc...@physik.fu-berlin.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#926539: Bug#987441: s390x installation bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #926539,
regarding rootskel: steal-ctty no longer works on at least spar
Hi!
On 5/3/21 12:21 PM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
>>> I'd suggest at least retitling the bug report to mention s390x (release
>>> arch, affected) instead of sparc64 (port arch, no longer affected), to
>>> lower the chances people could overlook this issue, thinking it's only
>>> about a port arch.
>>
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2021 12:21:14 +0200
with message-id <20210503102114.gb11...@lorien.valinor.li>
and subject line Re: Bug#796882: hyperv-daemons: include debian specific
versions of hv_get* scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #796882,
regarding hyperv-daemons: include debian speci
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 795991 + wontfix
Bug #795991 [src:linux] linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: duplicate request cache is
too small for NFS 4.1 servers
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
795991: htt
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2021 12:20:16 +0200
with message-id <20210503102016.ga11...@lorien.valinor.li>
and subject line Re: Bug#795991: /boot/vmlinuz-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: duplicate
request cache is too small for NFS 4.1 servers
has caused the Debian Bug report #795991,
regarding linux-image
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:58:02AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > The same issue exists on s390x but isn't apparently going to get fixed
> > so we need to have d-i be smarter (hence the merge request)?
>
> Seems so.
QEMU console might get fixed in the kernel, but it looks like LPAR c
Hi Salvatore
Am 01.05.21 um 07:55 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>
> Ack thans for confirming. So either someone tries to bring that issue
> again to upstream or alternatively we could then close this bug
> marking (and possibly marking it wontfix).
>
I'm fine with closing and marking wontfix be
I don't see the reported error messages in Stretch and Buster.
I think the issue is resolve.
Am 30.04.21 um 14:36 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>
> This should have been resolved in 4.5.1-1, when we got own init and
> systemd service units, is this correct?
>
OpenPGP_signature
Description: Op
Sorry, please ignore this message. Wrong Bug report.
Am 03.05.21 um 11:25 schrieb Christoph Martin:
> Hi Salvator,
>
>>
>> is this problem still relevant?
>>
>
> I don't see the reported error messages in Stretch and Buster.
> I think the issue is resolve.
>
> Christoph
>
OpenPGP_signature
Hi Salvator,
>
> is this problem still relevant?
>
I don't see the reported error messages in Stretch and Buster.
I think the issue is resolve.
Christoph
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 961056
Bug #961056 [src:linux,rootskel] debian-installer: qemu-system-s390x
installation fails due to incorrect serial device
Bug #926539 [src:linux,rootskel] rootskel: steal-ctty no longer works on at
least sparc64
Disconnected #961056
Hi!
On 5/3/21 8:36 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> From skimming through the bug log, it seems it was initially a sparc64
> problem, that was fixed in the kernel (inconsistent naming) eventually.
Correct.
> The same issue exists on s390x but isn't apparently going to get fixed
> so we need to have
27 matches
Mail list logo
