Bug#983314: linux-base: perf fails to report that linux-perf-5.10 is not installed

2021-02-25 Thread Jose R Rodriguez
On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 06:47 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Hi Bart, > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > > Package: linux-base > > Version: 4.6 > > Severity: minor > > File: /usr/bin/perf > > > > Observed behavior: > > > > $

Processed: Re: Bug#983314: linux-base: perf fails to report that linux-perf-5.10 is not installed

2021-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #983314 [linux-base] linux-base: perf fails to report that linux-perf-5.10 is not installed Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 983314: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983314 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#983314: linux-base: perf fails to report that linux-perf-5.10 is not installed

2021-02-25 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Bart, On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > Package: linux-base > Version: 4.6 > Severity: minor > File: /usr/bin/perf > > Observed behavior: > > $ perf > /usr/bin/perf: line 13: exec: perf_5.10: not found > > Expected behavior: > > $

[bts-link] source package src:linux

2021-02-25 Thread debian-bts-link
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #983047 (http://bugs.debian.org/983047

Processed: your mail

2021-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 983495 pending Bug #983495 [src:linux] linux-image-amd64: Please enable ee1004 module Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 983495: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Processed: bug 983372 is forwarded to https://lore.kernel.org/stable/fe6040b5-72a0-9882-439e-ea7fc0b39...@redhat.com/ ...

2021-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 983372 > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/fe6040b5-72a0-9882-439e-ea7fc0b39...@redhat.com/ Bug #983372 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-3-amd64: Graphic glitches / distortions when using Desktop (Plasma / KDE) Set Bug forwarded-to-address

Processed: found 983508 in 1:1.3.4-4

2021-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 983508 1:1.3.4-4 Bug #983508 [nfs-common] nfs-common: Bullseys/Kernel 5.10 SAMBA AD/DC NFSv4 Kerberos Problem with rpc.gssd Marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.3.4-4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Bug#983372: Correction of Bug-Report

2021-02-25 Thread user2304
I unfortunately pasted the wrong link to the redhat forum for further description of the bug. The correct one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925346 Kind regards, user2304 -- mail: user2...@web.de

Re: please consider disabling obsolete crypto in 5.10 and later

2021-02-25 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 11:35, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Ard, > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 10:21:27PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Ard, > > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:41:16PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > L.S., > > > > > > This is a request to consider disabling obsole

Re: please consider disabling obsolete crypto in 5.10 and later

2021-02-25 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Ard, On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 10:21:27PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Ard, > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:41:16PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > L.S., > > > > This is a request to consider disabling obsolete crypto in 5.10 and > > later Debian builds of the Linux kernel on any arc

Bug#983508: nfs-common: Bullseys/Kernel 5.10 SAMBA AD/DC NFSv4 Kerberos Problem with rpc.gssd

2021-02-25 Thread J. Pfennig
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.3.4-2.5+deb10u1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Dear Maintainers There is a long standing bug (or wrong documentation) in rpc.gssd Probably debian uses an outdated version (new upstream version). I consider this bug as severe because it breaks backward compa-

Bug#979764: Problem now understood, but potential security problem

2021-02-25 Thread Jürgen Pfennig
Dear Maintainers my bug report contained the neccessary information to understand the whole problem, but it is quite complex. FIXING bullseye NFS4 Kerberos with SAMBA Probably debian uses an outdated version of rpc.gssd , SAMBA behaves 100% correctly and someone removed support for weak rpc.gs