* Paul Gevers:
> * Concern for armel and armhf: only secondary upstream support in GCC
>(Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch and buster)
glibc upstream lately has trouble finding qualified persons to
implement security fixes for the 32-bit Arm architecture.
> * Concern
Mapping buster to stable.
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-10-686-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-10-686-pae-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-10-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-10-4kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-10-5kc-malta-di is
linux_4.19.131-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_4.19.131-1.dsc
linux_4.19.131.orig.tar.xz
linux_4.19.131-1.debian.tar.xz
linux_4.19.131-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 964494 - moreinfo
Bug #964494 [src:linux] File system corruption with ext3 + kernel-4.19.0-9-amd64
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
964494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
I need to combine reports # 964499 & # 964500 as they are the same report.
It seems that the report I filed first was delayed to the point that it
showed up after the report I filed second. In any case, I still have the
same problem & look forward to adding logs/information as anyone needs.
On 7/7/20 8:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 17:30 -0700, Sarah Newman wrote:
Package: linux-signed-amd64
Version: 4.19.0-9-amd64
We've had two separate reports now of debian buster users running
4.19.0-9-amd64 who experi
Hi,
[Note, this e-mail may look familiar as it is mostly copied over from
the buster call, not much has changed, AFAICT].
As part of the interim architecture qualification for bullseye, we
request that DSA, the security team, Wanna build, and the toolchain
maintainers review and update their list
Hello,
Same problem reported in 964480.
I tested forcemerge as a non maintainer, as it turns out, it doesn't work,
believe that this resource is destined for just for maintainers. If you are
the maintainer and want to merge the reports, it would be interesting. I
had no information about it and it
Hi,
I had previously reported this problem.
I tried to merge with 964153 the reports but apparently without
success, believe
that this function is only for maintainers of the package.
Greetings,
Leandro Cunha
forcemerge 964480
Em qua., 8 de jul. de 2020 às 10:11, Leandro Cunha <
leandrocunha...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> forcemerge #964480
>
> Em sex., 3 de jul. de 2020 às 05:23, Leandro Cunha <
> leandrocunha...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> The second log is generated with cat /var/log/syslog | grep ath9k.
forcemerge #964480
Em sex., 3 de jul. de 2020 às 05:23, Leandro Cunha <
leandrocunha...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> The second log is generated with cat /var/log/syslog | grep ath9k.
>
> ---
> Jul 3 03:17:59 debian-pc kernel: [ 20.741602] usb 1-1.4: ath9k_htc:
> Firmware ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.4.0.fw
Thanks a lot Mika! I'll try to add patches to BTS and Salsa, I think
this way is more easy for maintainers, to choose what they prefer
heheh
Cheers,
Guilherme
Juergen writes:
> In 5.7 reverting 6602f080cb is known to fix the problem, but it hasn't yet
> been
> analyzed by an expert, therefore I'd like to report my findings to perhaps get
> an expert interested:-)
>
> At least one problem is in function ath9k_hif_usb_reg_in_cb(). In the call to
> usb_f
Hi,
* Guilherme Piccoli [Fri Jul 03, 2020 at 05:29:52PM -0300]:
> Thanks for your +1 there Michael! Do you know if there's a way to get
> that merged? I'd like to follow the proper process and fix that on
> Debian before Ubuntu.
I'm not sure if Ben is watching/noticing Salsa MRs, Ben?
Guilherme
14 matches
Mail list logo