On 4/23/20 4:24 PM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
fq_codel is better in every way than pfifo_fast and I am unaware of any
reason why it would not be a better default. (but don't trust me, ask the
kernel networking experts)
Isn't CAKE suppos
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 23:50 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I came up with a simpler alternative:
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/67fa568149b985f73b333acdec4481acf667192f
Looks good... and seems like the best solution.
Thanks,
Chris.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> fq_codel is better in every way than pfifo_fast and I am unaware of any
> reason why it would not be a better default. (but don't trust me, ask the
> kernel networking experts)
Isn't CAKE supposed to be even better than fq_codel, incl
On Sun, 2020-04-19 at 01:21 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-04-18 at 22:54 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > No, it does not. It removes kmod's index files
> I probably should have better checked the code I've copy&pased ^^
>
>
> > This is a known bug but I don't know how to
#890343 was originally opened against systemd asking to install the
upstream systemd sysctl.d/50-default.conf file that sets:
net.core.default_qdisc = fq_codel
As explained in #950701 (and the systemd debian changelog) the debian
systemd maintainers felt that systemd in debian should not be ch
binary:acpi-modules-5.5.0-0.bpo.2-686-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-5.5.0-0.bpo.2-686-pae-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-5.5.0-0.bpo.2-4kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-5.5.0-0.bpo.2-5kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-5.5.0-0.bpo.2-lo
linux_5.5.17-1~bpo10+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_5.5.17-1~bpo10+1.dsc
linux_5.5.17-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
linux_5.5.17-1~bpo10+1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #945055 (http://bugs.debian.org/945055)
#
Package: debian-kernel-handbook
Version: 1.0.19
Severity: normal
Hi.
The handbook seems to use two git repos:
1) https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux.git
for Debian's packaging itself
2) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
for the upstream soruces, e.g. w
Hi,
there is a MR now:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/236
Happy hacking
Philip
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 958368 src:linux 4.19.98-1
Bug #958368 [linux-image-4.19.0-8-amd64] Hard IO Hangs
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-4.19.0-8-amd64' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-signed-amd64/4.19.98+1.
Ignoring reques
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:33 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 11:26 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Dear Debian-kernel team,
> >
> > > Would it be possible to ship an alternate ppc64 kernel build without
> > > the 64K page option ?
> >
> > Could someone please clarify if this i
12 matches
Mail list logo
