linux_4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:15:32 +0100 Source: linux Binary: linux-support-4.19.0-0.bpo.6 linux-doc-4.19 linux-cpupower libcpupower1 libcpupower-dev usbip hyperv-daemons lockdep liblockdep4.19 liblockdep-dev libbpf4.19 libb

Processing of linux_4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1_source.changes

linux_4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1.dsc linux_4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz linux_4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#941284: Wishlist/RFC: Use CONFIG_HZ=100 in linux-image-cloud-*

Thank you for your comments. To be very honest, I never did much research about this subject -- and for the reasons I explained before I always use 100Hz when recompiling for server usage. I can't comment about big SMPs but I always thought that the interrupts are routed independently, but I m

Processed: reassign 941450 to src:linux

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 941450 src:linux 4.19.67-2+deb10u1 Bug #941450 [linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64] linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64: e1000e driver periodically resets card Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64' to 'src:linux'. No longer marked as f

[bts-link] source package src:linux

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #939986 (http://bugs.debian.org/939986

Bug#941450: linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64: e1000e driver periodically resets card

Package: linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64 Version: 4.19.67-2+deb10u1 This issue looks like it might be related to #657689, or at least the symptoms are similar. Periodically, my network link goes down for ~35 seconds at a time. I have not been able to determine what traffic pattern or set of other set

Re: libbpf distro packaging

Thank you Jiri, that's great news. Adding Marco D'Itri. Marco, I wonder if you are OK with the rationale for libbpf packaging from GH mirror? Can we proceed with switching Debian package as well just like we discussed offline at ASG? The bug report for Fedora: [1] Thank you [1] https://bugzilla.r

Processed: reassign 940530 to src:linux, found 940530 in 5.2.17-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 940530 src:linux 4.19.67-2 Bug #940530 [linux-image-4.19.0-6-rpi] Add CONFIG_BRCMFMAC_SDIO=y to linux-image-rpi Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-4.19.0-6-rpi' to 'src:linux'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/4.19.67-2.

Re: libbpf distro packaging

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:12:37AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:30:24PM +, Julia Kartseva wrote: > > On 8/25/19, 11:42 PM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:00:01PM +, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > > > > > Technically we can bump it at an

Bug#940848: nfs-utils:CVE-2019-3689: root-owned files stored in insecure /var/lib/nfs

Hi, I'm in the Debian LTS/ELTS team and considering an update for this issue. Do you (package maintainers) intend to address it? Or would you like a patch? Cheers! Sylvain