Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source linux
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux'
Limit currently set to 'source':'linux'
> tags 906054 + pending
Bug #906054 [src:linux] linux-image-4.18.0-rc5-armmp: Please enable support for
SFP module
I have enabled SFP support for 4.18-rc8 for armhf only, and tested that
on my clearfog.
It turns out to work just fine! Please find the patch attached. Note
that I believe this setting should probably be enabled for all
architectures, but I can currently only do real testing on armhf, and
maybe on
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.18~rc5-1~exp1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
With the release of linux 4.14 support for SFP pages has been introduced.
Please enable support for this in the armmp and arm64 flavours.
To name two devices that have an SFP port and can run debian testing:
- solidrun
I have found no earlier version where this worked with the debian kernel.
All of the following exhibit the problem with similar errors:
- linux-image-4.9.0-7-armmp_4.9.110-3+deb9u1_armhf.deb
- linux-image-4.16.0-2-armmp_4.16.16-2_armhf.deb
- linux-image-4.18.0-rc5-armmp_4.18~rc5-1~exp1_armhf.deb
Forgot to mention BT_HCIUART_BCM is enabled in 4.9 default config on
debian, so I think this is a regression rather than a wishlist bug for
enabling.
Cheers,
Adrian
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.17.8-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The Compex pci express wifi module fails to probe apparently because it isn't
waking up. I can't see anything wrong here, and the module used to work with
older (vendor) kernels.
Any clues what is going on?
Yours sincerely
Jo
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.17.8-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
unable to use built-in Bluetooth (SDIO BCM) adaptor, missing BCM HCIUART
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
btattach --bredr
binary:acpi-modules-4.17.0-2-686-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-4.17.0-2-686-pae-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-4.17.0-2-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.17.0-2-4kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.17.0-2-5kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.17.0-2-loongson-3-di is NEW.
binary:aff
linux_4.17.14-1_all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_4.17.14-1.dsc
linux_4.17.14.orig.tar.xz
linux_4.17.14-1.debian.tar.xz
linux-doc-4.17_4.17.14-1_all.deb
linux-headers-4.17.0-2-common_4.17.14-1_all.deb
linux-source-4.17_4.17.14-1_all.deb
linux-s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 905751 4.17.14-1
Bug #905751 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux] linux:
CVE-2018-5390
Bug #905966 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.7-amd64: CVE-2018-5390 not fixed?
The source 'linux' and version '4.1
Between jessie and stretch I folded the contents of firmware-adi and
firmware-ralink packages into firmware-misc-nonfree. However, I
mistakenly dropped those binary packages entirely rather than making
them transitional packages for the stretch release. I noticed this
recently while looking at up
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 01:44:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>On 08/13/2018 01:57 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:56:59AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> => Question: should we restrict architectures we build images for?
>>
>> Probably. I'm only thinking x86, arm64 and
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #871779 [cifs-utils] /sbin/mount.cifs: Some remote folders missing when
mounting the share using -o vers=2.x option
Bug reassigned from package 'cifs-utils' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions cifs-utils/2:6.7-1.
Ignoring
On 08/13/2018 01:57 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:56:59AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> => Question: should we restrict architectures we build images for?
>
> Probably. I'm only thinking x86, arm64 and maybe armhf. Wait for
> people to ask for others and add on a case-b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 905969 + upstream
Bug #905969 [src:linux] amdgpu: only one audio port shows up in pulseaudio
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
905969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
15 matches
Mail list logo