Re: UPDATE: Re: Proposal: UEFI secure boot implementation sprint, 5-8 April 2018

2018-01-28 Thread Philipp Hahn
Hello, Am 28.01.2018 um 12:46 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > HOWEVER... those dates clash with another group already booked in at > the LinuxHotel in Essen. So we've started talking to people in Fulsa > as a fallback option. We have a tentative space for a venue and now we > need to book hotel rooms. S

Bug#878866: [PATCH] usbip: Correct maximum value of CONFIG_USBIP_VHCI_HC_PORTS

2018-01-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
Now that usbip supports USB3, the maximum number of ports allowed on a hub is 15 (USB_SS_MAXPORTS), not 31 (USB_MAXCHILDREN). Reported-by: Gianluigi Tiesi Reported-by: Borissh1983 References: https://bugs.debian.org/878866 Fixes: 1c9de5bf4286 ("usbip: vhci-hcd: Add USB3 SuperSpeed support") Sign

Processed: limit source to linux, tagging 878866

2018-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source linux Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux' Limit currently set to 'source':'linux' > tags 878866 + pending Bug #878866 [usbip] usbip configuration is not usable Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stoppi

Re: UPDATE: Re: Proposal: UEFI secure boot implementation sprint, 5-8 April 2018

2018-01-28 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14931 March 1977, Steve McIntyre wrote: > HOWEVER... those dates clash with another group already booked in at > the LinuxHotel in Essen. So we've started talking to people in Fulsa > as a fallback option. We have a tentative space for a venue and now we > need to book hotel rooms. So... If you

Re: Bug#888263: Spectre : release kernel 4.9.77 to stretch before p-u

2018-01-28 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > So you want to include the patch even if it's reverted upstream? > > Oh, I misunderstood what you were saying. No I don't. But I think it > makes sense to trigger a rebuild of modules once the retpoline compiler > support is in place.

Re: Bug#888263: Spectre : release kernel 4.9.77 to stretch before p-u

2018-01-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 19:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > So I went ahead an updated to 4.9.78 and added the revert for the VERMAGIC > > > stuff (which is queued for 4.9.79). > > > > This makes sense. I think once an updated gcc is

Re: Bug#888263: Spectre : release kernel 4.9.77 to stretch before p-u

2018-01-28 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > So I went ahead an updated to 4.9.78 and added the revert for the VERMAGIC > > stuff (which is queued for 4.9.79). > > This makes sense. I think once an updated gcc is available in stretch > we should bump the ABI number and Build-Depend

Re: Bug#888263: Spectre : release kernel 4.9.77 to stretch before p-u

2018-01-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:42 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > work on 4.9.77 is mostly done, so yes I'd like to push it to stretch before > > next point relase. 4.9.78 is just out but I'm unsure if we want to hold it > > or > > n

Re: Bug#888263: Spectre : release kernel 4.9.77 to stretch before p-u

2018-01-28 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > work on 4.9.77 is mostly done, so yes I'd like to push it to stretch before > next point relase. 4.9.78 is just out but I'm unsure if we want to hold it or > not. Hi Ben, So I went ahead an updated to 4.9.78 and added the revert for

UPDATE: Re: Proposal: UEFI secure boot implementation sprint, 5-8 April 2018

2018-01-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 05:49:20PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >We have 7 people with dates in the poll so far: > > Helen Koike > Luke Faraone > Me > Ben Hutchings > Tollef Fog Heen > Chris Lamb > Philipp Hahn > >Any more people interested in coming? If so, please fill in the dates >ASAP. I was