On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 05:56:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 27.05.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > I remember that this worked in the past, and I suspect an issue related
> > to a kernel update:
>
> Can you copy the attached service file to /etc/systemd/system/, then run
> systemct
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 863257 + gdm3
Bug #863257 [linux-image-4.9.0-3-amd64] internal display not turned off despite
lid closed and docked
Added indication that 863257 affects gdm3
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 linux-image-4.9.0-3-amd64
Bug #863257 [gdm3] gdm3: stretch - login box displayed off-screen
Bug reassigned from package 'gdm3' to 'linux-image-4.9.0-3-amd64'.
No longer marked as found in versions gdm3/3.22.3-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 12:38:12AM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> NIC works right away, I have to cold boot to see the USB3 hard
> drives.
> The only kernel that worked reliably after reboot was 4.5.5-1
Have you tried to apply the other patch, too? It's supposedly helping with
this very problem.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:37:38AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 04:08:56PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I've verified that this fails on my XU4 in both Debian 4.9 and 4.11,
as well as upstream 4.12-rc1 (haven't tried 4.10, probably doesn't work).
The discussio
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:57:00AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Of course, the BeagleBoard-X15 isn't using USB for anything, so this
> isn't much of a test, but it's the only other board I have available
> that uses dwc3.
I suppose you could plug a device into it, even if there's nothing onbo
On 2017-05-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I've also got a BeagleBoard-X15 that works reasonably well without the
> patch; will test the patched kernel to see if it appears to cause any
> problems.
Of course, the BeagleBoard-X15 isn't using USB for anything, so this
isn't much of a test, but it's t
On 2017-05-27, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> Well, it's a revert of something that's supposed to only be a
>> cleanup/refactor (but isn't, presumably due to phy bugs). So it _should_ be
>> safe, at least in theory.
>>
>> FWIW
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2017 14:15:29 +0100
with message-id <1495890929.29474.107.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#863389: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.3-amd64: After update
to linux-image-4.9.0.0-0.bpo.3, no route to host via IPV4
has caused the Debian Bug report #863389,
regardi
Forwarded Message
From: Jason Wittlin-Cohen
To: Ben Hutchings
Subject: Re: Bug#863389: linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.3-amd64: After update to
linux-image-4.9.0.0-0.bpo.3, no route to host via IPV4
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 20:23:23 -0400
Message-id:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the reply. You'
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Well, it's a revert of something that's supposed to only be a
> cleanup/refactor (but isn't, presumably due to phy bugs). So it _should_ be
> safe, at least in theory.
>
> FWIW, after a bit over two hours, this happened:
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
