On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:11:52AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 13/12/16 22:46, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> Thanks for providing this feedback
> >>
> >> I've done the following:
> >> - forked the upstr
Hello Raphaël Halimi,
Congrats on completely derailing a thread that for once was about
proper mainenance and solving a bigger problem into becoming
about your pet peeve. Please feel free to stop CCing me if you
don't actually want my feedback.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:01:19PM +0100, Raphaël Ha
On 13/12/16 22:46, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> Thanks for providing this feedback
>>
>> I've done the following:
>> - forked the upstream repository
>> - created a debian/sid branch
>> - copied debian/* from jessie in
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 03:59:09 +
Source: firmware-nonfree
Binary: firmware-linux firmware-linux-nonfree firmware-amd-graphics
firmware-atheros firmware-bnx2 firmware-bnx2x firmware-brcm80211
firmware-cavium firmware-in
firmware-nonfree_20161130-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_20161130-2.dsc
firmware-nonfree_20161130-2.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2016 04:18:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#847343: fixed in firmware-nonfree 20161130-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #847343,
regarding firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <=
0.125) if plymouth installed
to be marked as
Dne 9.12.2016 v 23:46 Dodji Seketeli napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> Nicholas Piggin a écrit:
>
> [...]
>
>> That said, a dwarf based checker tool should be able to do as good a job
>> (maybe a bit better because report is very informative and it may pick up
>> compiler alignments or padding options).
The same failure occurs with linux-image-4.8.0-2-armmp 4.8.11-1.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le 13/12/2016 à 22:09, Andreas Henriksson a écrit :
> I would suggest tagging these both as wontfix. Adding even more options
> to the broken concept of /etc/default just adds to the maintenance burden
> of having to carry this over via the nfs-utils_env.sh bridge.
>
> Both /etc/default/nfs-kernel
Correction: the output for the non-working boot is not from dmesg but
from the serial console :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.8.7-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading from linux-image-4.7.0-1-armmp 4.7.8-1 to
linux-image-4.8.0-1-armmp 4.8.7-1, my Mele A1000G set top box can no
longer mount the root filesystem on boot and gives up waiting for it
to appear:
[2.743254] eh
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for providing this feedback
>
> I've done the following:
> - forked the upstream repository
> - created a debian/sid branch
> - copied debian/* from jessie into that branch and committed
> - copied debian/* from s
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:37:42 +0100
Source: nfs-utils
Binary: nfs-kernel-server nfs-common
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:1.3.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian kernel team
Changed-By: Dan
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:52:10PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 13/12/16 21:40, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> > Le 13/12/2016 à 21:36, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> >> Do you think you could investigate a little bit more and add
> >> details to the bug, maybe have a look in Fedora's repositories to
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:04:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841387: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.3.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841387,
regarding nfs-utils: typo in idmapd.conf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On 13/12/16 21:40, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Le 13/12/2016 à 21:36, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>> Do you think you could investigate a little bit more and add
>> details to the bug, maybe have a look in Fedora's repositories to
>> see if they have a way to do that or ask on debian-devel?
>
> I'm not
Le 13/12/2016 à 21:36, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> Do you think you could investigate a little bit more and add details
> to the bug, maybe have a look in Fedora's repositories to see if they
> have a way to do that or ask on debian-devel?
I'm not sure I'm the right person for this job, I don't know
On 13/12/16 21:21, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Sorry to intrude but, since you all seem eager to revive nfs
> packages (which I'm very happy about), could you please take a look
> at #539201 and include my patch ? It would allow to close both this
> bug and #738063, which are both quite
Hi guys,
Sorry to intrude but, since you all seem eager to revive nfs packages
(which I'm very happy about), could you please take a look at #539201
and include my patch ? It would allow to close both this bug and
#738063, which are both quite old.
(disclaimer : I don't know yet how to do the sam
nfs-utils_1.3.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nfs-utils_1.3.4-1.dsc
nfs-utils_1.3.4.orig.tar.xz
nfs-utils_1.3.4-1.debian.tar.bz2
nfs-common-dbgsym_1.3.4-1_amd64.deb
nfs-common_1.3.4-1_amd64.deb
nfs-kernel-server-dbgsym_1.3.4-1_amd64.deb
nfs-k
On 12/12/16 21:05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 11:13 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>>>
Could either of you comment on this bug? I saw your names in the
nfs-uti
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:49:25 +
with message-id <1481644165.2742.42.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: linux: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
has caused the Debian Bug report #835957,
regarding linux: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
to be marked a
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:21:21 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> I agree we need to stop this version of firmware-nonfree going into
> testing before initramfs-tools is fixed, so I'm assigning this bug
> back.
This keeps #838858 (missing SI/CI smc firmware files) open in testing,
leaving aff
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.8-9.2
rpc.svcgssd woes at boot time
-- Unit rpc-svcgssd.service has begun starting up.
Dec 13 10:04:07 dpcl064.ac.aixigo.de rpc.svcgssd[2019]: ERROR: GSS-API: error
in gss_acquire_cred(): GSS_S_FAILURE (Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may
provide more inf
24 matches
Mail list logo
