Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch fixed-upstream
Bug #779628 [src:linux] bcache: task bcache_writebac blocked for more than 240
seconds, system load high when module used
Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream.
> fixed -1 4.3.3-6
Bug #779628 [src:linux] bcache: task bcache_writebac block
Control: tag -1 patch fixed-upstream
Control: fixed -1 4.3.3-6
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 21:09 +, Tim Small wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3
> Followup-For: Bug #779628
>
> I think this patch fixes this issue:
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/627ccd20b4ad3
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3
Followup-For: Bug #779628
I think this patch fixes this issue:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/627ccd20b4ad3ba836472468208e2ac4dfadbf03
It's included in this set which got merged in the 4.5 window. See this
thread:
https://lkml.org/lkm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 795772 lvm2
Bug #795772 [src:linux] [src:linux] linux-image-4.1.0-1 fails to boot on
mirrored lvm
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'lvm2'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux/4.1.3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed ver
Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Would you prefer that we moved future freezes (i.e. Buster and later),
>> so we could always rely on Greg's branch?
>
> Yes, I would.
>
Ok, we will take it into consideration for the planning of the next freez
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 16:58 +0100, Carsten Wolff wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2016 01:10:37 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I found what seems to be a bug in the driver, but it was present in
> > both 3.2 and 3.16. Please test whether the attached patch fixes this
> > issue
>
> Hum, the patch only fix
I also see this happening on Debian Jessie with kernel 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3
(and older 3.2).
Root is on LVM RAID1, boot fails with error:
device-mapper: table: 253:11: raid: Fail to run raid array
In initramfs prompt I am able to see only technical volumes *_mlog_mimage_*,
*_mimage_*, bu
On Friday 05 February 2016 01:10:37 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I found what seems to be a bug in the driver, but it was present in
> both 3.2 and 3.16. Please test whether the attached patch fixes this
> issue
Hum, the patch only fixes the decision, if and when the key is reset before an
operation,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:06:47 +
Source: linux-2.6
Binary: linux-tools-2.6.32 linux-source-2.6.32 linux-doc-2.6.32
linux-manual-2.6.32 linux-patch-debian-2.6.32 firmware-linux-free
linux-support-2.6.32-5 linux-base lin
linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze19_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze19.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze19.diff.gz
linux-support-2.6.32-5_2.6.32-48squeeze19_all.deb
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-48squeeze19_all.deb
linux-base_2.6.32-48sq
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 15:52 +0100, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please allow me to dive in here, i do have a very similar problem.
>
> one of my VPS is running on a providers host system, that seems to use
> an old Xen version, which can't boot the Jessie-Kernel.
> at the moment im using the
Hi,
please allow me to dive in here, i do have a very similar problem.
one of my VPS is running on a providers host system, that seems to use
an old Xen version, which can't boot the Jessie-Kernel.
at the moment im using the wheezy-Kernel on jessie, but that's not the
best solution...
do i have
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3
Control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 23:25 -0500, Rich Ercolani wrote:
> Package: linux-source-3.16
> Version: 3.16.0-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I was going about my business, using perf top to see w
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3
Bug #813764 [linux-source-3.16] linux-source-3.16: "Dazed and confused, but
trying to continue" on X10SDV-TLN4F while using perf top
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-source-3.16' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:40 -0200, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in my response. In the past couple days I was
> confirming with Oracle if my findings (using virt-what, as you
> suggested) where right and, indeed, they are supporting Xen HVM right
> now.
Great!
>
> So, there's no nee
15 matches
Mail list logo