Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 812207 src:linux 3.16.7-ckt20-1
Bug #812207 [linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64] linux: AUFS can hang up; Please update
to v20160111 or later
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in v
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch moreinfo
Bug #812207 [linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64] linux: AUFS can hang up; Please update
to v20160111 or later
Added tag(s) patch and moreinfo.
--
812207: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
Control: tag -1 patch moreinfo
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:08:17 + Akihiro Suda wrote:
> Source: linux-image-3.16.0-4
Please use 'reportbug kernel' to report any future kernel bugs, as that
will select the correct package name automatically.
> Version: 3.16.7-ckt20
> Severity: important
>
> Dea
> You would have got a faster response if you had reported the bug
> against a real package name in the first place.
I'm sorry for that.
2016-01-26 10:29 GMT+09:00 Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:06 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2016 4:49 PM, "Ben Hutchings" wrote:
>> >
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:06 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2016 4:49 PM, "Ben Hutchings" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:23 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
> > > Can this issue be treated with high importance?
> >
> > You would have got a faster response if you had reported the
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:23 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
> Can this issue be treated with high importance?
You would have got a faster response if you had reported the bug
against a real package name in the first place.
> Right now, there is no
> version of jessie-stable or wheezy-backports whic
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u6
Followup-For: Bug #810821
We also experience link dropouts on tg3 with kernel 3.16 from debian on heavily
used internet GW with NAT. No XEN.
This is very common after few hours of run.
Jan 17 06:54:17 c kernel: [141903.348634] tg3 :06:00.0 e
Do you have a package version which you know to be good? How confident are
you that it is ok (sometimes the problem is intermittent)?
Lastly, is there any chance you upgraded the Xen packages at the same time?
I'm starting to wonder if maybe this is not a kernel issue.
Sorry, but there is chanc
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #767448 [initramfs-tools] No way to override settings from
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d/*
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
767448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 02:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:17:46 +0100 Piotr Jurkiewicz wrote:
> > Package: initramfs-tools
> >
> > There is no way for user to override settings from
> > /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d.
> >
> > For examp
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #807527 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: Please provide an API or best
practices for custom initramfs hook configuration
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
807527: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807527
Debian Bug Tracki
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
initramfs-tools.8 | 11 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/initramfs-tools.8 b/initramfs-tools.8
index a276be3..d13aec8 100644
--- a/initramfs-tools.8
+++ b/initramfs-tools.8
@@ -280,13 +280,12 @@ allows arch specific hook ad
Control: tag -1 patch pending
---
Closes: #807527
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
initramfs-tools.8 | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/initramfs-tools.8 b/initramfs-tools.8
index ba00295..e6bc5e2 100644
--- a/initramfs-tools.8
+++ b/initramfs-tools.8
@@ -1
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
initramfs-tools.8 | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/initramfs-tools.8 b/initramfs-tools.8
index d13aec8..ba00295 100644
--- a/initramfs-tools.8
+++ b/initramfs-tools.8
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ loads netconsole linux modules with the
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > As I got the impression that support for the RPi was now present in
> > > upstream and (therefor) the Debian kernels,
> >
> > The "therefor" won't happen automatica
On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > As I got the impression that support for the RPi was now present in
> > upstream and (therefor) the Debian kernels,
>
> The "therefor" won't happen automatically, someone will need to file a
> wishlist bug asking for the relevant options t
On Monday 25 January 2016 15:07:50 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The armmp kernel flavour should now support the BCM2836 and the Pi 2,
>
> I missed this going in, thanks!
>
> > but *not* the BCM2835. Also, Debian's armhf port is built for ARMv7
> > whereas the BCM2835 implements ARMv6. Most of the pe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 790722 Stephen Powell
Bug #790722 [initramfs-tools] mkinitramfs fails with latest udev (>= 220-7) on
some systems
Changed Bug submitter to 'Stephen Powell ' from
'Stephen Powell '
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 16:05 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:14 +0100 Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Package: initramfs-tools
> > Version: 0.120
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Allow hooks to supply specific root mount failure handlers. These can
> > both report more specific fai
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 22:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > By the way, I am still hoping to get my parse_numeric patch, available at
> > http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/kernel/parse_numeric.patch, included in
> > initramfs-tools.
>
> It's not there any more...
>
> > The current code can
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:49:33 + Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 18:46 -0600, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
[...]
> > Would definitely like to see this, with a recent install on a Wandboard
> > Dual with a USB2 sata disk for the rootfs. It installed fine with
> > jessie's debian-installer
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 14:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:46 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > Thanks for your response :-)
> >
> > On Monday 25 January 2016 13:23:20 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's
> > > > 4.
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 20:35 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Serge, I'm sorry this patch hasn't had any attention for so long.
>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:20:28 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
> > Here is a patch (against the ubuntu package, just as example)
> > which instead of doing a dumb retry loop
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:46 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > I wasn't aware that any of the RPi support (for any model) had gone
> > upstream.
>
> It has taken a while, but it seems that major parts are now upstream-ed.
> See the changelog mentioned earlier.
Great!
[...]
> As I got the impres
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:52:10 +
with message-id <1453733530.3734.208.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#812593: linux-base: saa7134_alsa won't unload,
reported in use by kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #812593,
regarding linux-base: saa7134_alsa won't unload
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:46 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Thanks for your response :-)
>
> On Monday 25 January 2016 13:23:20 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4
> > > kernel for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the versa
Thanks for your response :-)
On Monday 25 January 2016 13:23:20 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4
> > kernel for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the versatile
> > kernel is meant for the Raspberry Pi.
>
> The versatile ker
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 21:38 +0200, KSB wrote:
> Seen this behavior on earlier kernels (i.e. 3.14-2-amd64 pkg 3.14.15-2.)
> and seems to be gone at least in 4.3
That's useful info thanks, I've been unable to pinpoint a culprit for this
for ages now.
Do you have a package version which you know to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 784688 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u2
Bug #784688 [linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64] Thousands of "xen:balloon: Cannot add
additional memory (-17) messages" despite dom0 ballooning disabled
Marked as found in versions linux/3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u2.
> thanks
On Sat, 2016-01-16 at 03:22 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4 kernel
> for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the versatile kernel is
> meant
> for the Raspberry Pi.
The versatile kernel is meant for ARM "
Package: linux-base
Version: 3.5
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Dear Maintainer,
Here is the summary:
* What led up to the situation?
I don't know when this problem first appeared as I was upgrading
regularly and did not need to remove the module. Recently I was forced to do a
fresh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 812540 + moreinfo
Bug #812540 [linux] Add ARCH_HISI for Lemaker HiKey support
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
812540: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=81
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:53 +0100, Torben Schou Jensen wrote:
> Something with Xen is unstable since upgrade to kernel 4.3.0.1.
This is fixed in 4.3.3-7 I believe as bug #810472.
Ian.
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:37:57 +
with message-id <20160125103757.ga28...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#811250: other: CPU FAN
has caused the Debian Bug report #811250,
regarding other: CPU FAN
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 21:21 +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Package: linux
> Version: 4.3.3-7
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: d-i
>
> Dear kernel maintainers,
>
> while trying to get a d-i booted on a Lemaker HiKey, tbm pointed out
> that ARCH_HISI is not (yet) activated on linux.
>
> Please enable i
Something with Xen is unstable since upgrade to kernel 4.3.0.1.
After 24 hours since last boot I suddenly on Dom0 get:
Jan 25 09:37:01 debian CRON[20287]: (root) CMD (if test -x
/usr/sbin/apticron; then /usr/sbin/apticron --cron; else true; fi) Jan 25
09:37:52 debian kernel: [85204.136136] INFO:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:01:44PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> > for mounting ISO images within the Debian Installer, the loop and ISO file
> > system module udebs are missing and should be included. I will attach a
> > patc
37 matches
Mail list logo
