Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt20-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrade of linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 to linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 Emulex
fiber card cannot see or connect to lun-s using lpfc driver.
What I tried to do:
1. Manually rescan lun-s
echo "- - -" >/sys/class/scs
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 19:20 -0500, Robert Henney wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.2.73-2+deb7u1
> Severity: important
>
> Today's kernel security update appears to have broken JFS support on i386,
> though JFS
> still appears to be working on x86_64.
[...]
I don
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #808266 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae: i386 Wheezy JFS broken in
3.2.73-2+deb7u1 security update
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
808266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Mapping stable-security to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:10:28 +
Source: linux
Binary: linux-source-3.16 linux-doc-3.16 linux-manual-3.16
linux-support-3.16.0-4 linux-libc-dev linux-headers-3.16.0-4-all
lin
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:28:02 +
Source: linux
Binary: linux-source-3.2 linux-doc-3.2 linux-manual-3.2 linux-support-3.2.0-4
linux-libc-dev linux-headers-3.2.0-4-
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.73-2+deb7u1
Severity: important
Today's kernel security update appears to have broken JFS support on i386,
though JFS
still appears to be working on x86_64.
# mount -t jfs /dev/sda1 /mnt
mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
# modprobe jfs
ERROR: could not insert
Hi,
I wanted to say pass options to my compress program, e.g.
# cat /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/xz
compress="pxz -Ccrc32 -1" # dev builds should build fast
compress="pxz -Ccrc32 -9ev" # prod builds should boot fast
Unfortunately this code requires the compress (or COMPRESS)
linux_3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1.dsc
linux_3.16.7-ckt20.orig.tar.xz
linux_3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1.debian.tar.xz
linux-support-3.16.0-4_3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u1_all.deb
linux-doc-3.16_3.16.7-ckt20-1+de
linux_3.2.73-2+deb7u1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_3.2.73-2+deb7u1.dsc
linux_3.2.73.orig.tar.xz
linux_3.2.73-2+deb7u1.debian.tar.xz
linux-support-3.2.0-4_3.2.73-2+deb7u1_all.deb
linux-doc-3.2_3.2.73-2+deb7u1_all.deb
linux-manual-3.2_3.2.73
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:21:52 +
Source: linux
Binary: linux-source-4.3 linux-support-4.3.0-1 linux-doc-4.3 linux-manual-4.3
linux-libc-dev linux-headers-4.3.0-1-all linux-headers-4.3.0-1-all-alpha
kernel-image-4.3.0-1
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
January 23rd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
linux_4.3.3-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux_4.3.3-2.dsc
linux_4.3.3-2.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 808246 src:linux 4.2.6-3
Bug #808246 [linux-image-4.2.0-1-powerpc64le] Stretch fails to install on
OpenPOWER systems
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-4.2.0-1-powerpc64le' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linu
Package: linux-image-4.2.0-1-powerpc64le
Version: 4.2.6-3
Severity: grave
Using the latest debian-installer netboot kernel to install on an
OpenPOWER server; install proceeds normally until disk detection when it
fails stating no disks can be found. dmesg shows a slew of errors similar
to the fol
Am 11.12.2015 um 15:35 schrieb Guilhem Moulin:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 at 00:54:03 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 12:15 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:52:11 +0100 Guilhem Moulin
>>> wrote:
AFAIK there is no documentation for where u
15 matches
Mail list logo