Bug#721005: linux: sierra Gobi 3000 WWAN no longer works

2015-11-07 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. That seems to work again at least since 4.2.5-1, but probably already since few versions earlier (I didn't check this every time). See upstream for little more details Closing, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Bug#721005: marked as done (linux: sierra Gobi 3000 WWAN no longer works)

2015-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2015 04:04:37 +0100 with message-id <1446951877.3.5.ca...@scientia.net> and subject line Re: linux: sierra Gobi 3000 WWAN no longer works has caused the Debian Bug report #721005, regarding linux: sierra Gobi 3000 WWAN no longer works to be marked as done. This m

Processed: found in 4.1

2015-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found 790050 4.1+67 Bug #790050 [src:linux] linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64: Cannot use sdcard: DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes at device :02:00.0 The source 'linux' and version '4.1+67' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as found in version

Bug#790050: found in 4.1

2015-11-07 Thread David Bremner
Control: found 790050 4.1+67 I experience this problem (also on a thinkpad) with kernel 4.1. It does seem to go away (at least temporarily) with a reboot.

Re: Upstream source handling

2015-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 17:49 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: [...] > > Do you think we would tag when updating to a new upstream version, or > > only when making the first upload with a new orig tarball (allowing for > > further DFSG changes before uploading)? > > I think we have to tag while updating.

Re: Upstream source handling

2015-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 17:53 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 02:16:13PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > 7. The DFSG changes are not documented in the source package > > 8. Each featureset is reduced to a single patch in the source package > > > > (7) should be easy to fix, as

Re: Upstream source handling

2015-11-07 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 02:16:13PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 7. The DFSG changes are not documented in the source package > 8. Each featureset is reduced to a single patch in the source package > > (7) should be easy to fix, as the history is linear, except where we > delete part of a file. g

Re: Upstream source handling

2015-11-07 Thread Bastian Blank
Ben, thanks for the comments. On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 01:48:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 22:52 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Main principles: > So genorig.py would be replaced with 'git archive'? Yes. > > Workflow: > > - New upstream version > >   - Rebase old tag o

Re: Upstream source handling

2015-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 13:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > What I like: > 1. Rebasing is easier > 2. I can log, diff, etc. through our changes and upstream changes > > What I don't like: > 3. Pushing is more complicated > 4. Cherry-picking is more complicated > 5. Git working directory looks

Re: Upstream source handling

2015-11-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
Bastian, I'm really sorry I've taken so long to look at this. On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 22:52 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Moin > > During the linux packaging BoF at DebConf, Ben asked for usefull > upstream source handling.  No compeling ones were mentioned. > > Some years ago (yes, years), I prop

Bug#779515: Should enable the qxl kernel driver when installed

2015-11-07 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 07/11/15 02:23, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 00:24 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: reassign 779515 linux-image-4.2.0-1-amd64 severity 779515 important thanks On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:47:54 + Ben Hutchings wrote: > I've enabled the kernel's qxl driver, but disabled by

Bug#804318: marked as done (linux-image-amd64: no more linux-image RT available on sid)

2015-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:17:47 + with message-id <1446891467.6006.22.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#804318: linux-image-amd64: no more linux-image RT available on sid has caused the Debian Bug report #804318, regarding linux-image-amd64: no more linux-image RT av

Bug#804318: linux-image-amd64: no more linux-image RT available on sid

2015-11-07 Thread Florian Foinant
Package: linux-image-amd64 Version: 4.2+68 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, As the linux-image_4.1.0-2-rt-* package has been removed from sid repository, it has no more PREEMPT-RT patched kernel in the sid distribution. Solution is giving back this version or patching linux-latest. Many tha

Bug#802432: marked as done (linux-image-4.3.0-rc5-amd64 fails to attach usb storage device)

2015-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 07 Nov 2015 09:34:29 + with message-id <144669.6006.19.ca...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#802432: fixed, can be closed. has caused the Debian Bug report #802432, regarding linux-image-4.3.0-rc5-amd64 fails to attach usb storage device to be marked as don

Processed: Re: Bug#661193: linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions

2015-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 linux-tools/4.2-2 Bug #661193 [linux-tools-3.2] linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions Marked as found in versions linux-tools/4.2-2. > tags -1 + fixed-upstream Bug #661193 [linux-tools-3.2] linux-tools-3

Bug#661193: linux-tools-3.2: perf fails to annotate code with separate debug info under some conditions

2015-11-07 Thread Sven Joachim
Control: found -1 linux-tools/4.2-2 Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream On 2012-02-24 23:11 +0100, Sami Liedes wrote: > Package: linux-tools-3.2 > Version: 3.2.1-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi! > > perf report does not show source code lines (annotation) for some > binaries with separate debug informa