I intend to upload linux version 4.1.3-1 to unstable early this week,
possibly on Monday.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Unix is many things to many people,
but it's never been everything to anybody.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
At some point we're hopefully going to support Secure Boot on amd64.
That means there will be a signed kernel image (separate from the
current linux-image packages) and a signed GRUB image. The kernel
modules in the linux-image packages will also be signed, probably with
an ephemeral key.
All the
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tag -1 jessie sid
Control: found -1 3.16.7-ckt11-1
Control: found -1 4.0.8-2
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 20:48 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> [I'm sorry that previous email didn't send to the right bug thread, so
> resend here]
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Thanks for y
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #793608 [linux] linux: update "Depends" of linux on armel/sh4 due to
package renamed
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> tag -1 jessie sid
Bug #793608 [linux] linux: update "Depends" of linux on armel/sh4 due to
package renamed
Added t
Le 2015-08-02 15:17, Milan Kupcevic a écrit :
On 07/22/2015 11:47 AM, intervenant0 gilles charabot wrote:
Dear Maintainer, To avoid the consequences of the bug#741642, I want
to use mkvmlinuz/38, but it isn't inside Jessie repository and isn't
yet inside jessie-backports repository and when I t
On 07/22/2015 11:47 AM, intervenant0 gilles charabot wrote:
>
> Dear Maintainer, To avoid the consequences of the bug#741642, I want
> to use mkvmlinuz/38, but it isn't inside Jessie repository and isn't
> yet inside jessie-backports repository and when I tried to download
> the patch with :
>
>
[I'm sorry that previous email didn't send to the right bug thread, so
resend here]
Dear Maintainer,
Thanks for your attention, I see this issue already got handled in
svn/trunk by r22868 and r22869.
My question is will this fix go into jessie/wheezy branch?
Since this issue actually occurred fro
Dear Ian,
Thanks for your feedback!
After reading your comment, I reviewed the whole procedure of loading
netconsole module during initramfs-tools booting, previously and after
my patch, I start to consider that original "modprobe netconsole
netconsole=$param" line in init file is merely a dirty
8 matches
Mail list logo
