Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #742226 [src:linux] linux-image-3.13-1-amd64: Internet banking fails to
detect Java with Debian kernels
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
742226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 18:54 -0300, Gurvan Huiban wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.13.6-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When using Debian kernels, my browser fails to detect Java when
> accessing my Internet Banking. When using vanilla kernels, ev
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.13.6-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When using Debian kernels, my browser fails to detect Java when accessing my
Internet Banking. When using vanilla kernels, everything works perfectly.
More precisely:
The Internet banking site is Banco do Brasil (http://w
It seems the device names have changed for the fan and thermostat i2c devices.
This patch addresses 3 issues with the therm_windtunnel driver.
1. Fix the device names
2. Remove the deprecated attach_adapter method of loading the driver
3. Expose the fan level setting to /sys/devices/temperature (
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 10:44 -0400, ty...@mit.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:10:48AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > Probably worthwhile to make those !EXT4_OS_HURD checks likely()?
>
> Yes, and I was planning on opt
Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:08:25 +
with message-id <1395335305.2770.6.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#742169: firmware-linux: fimware-linux-free and
firmware-linux-nonfree have common files ==> uninstallable
has caused the Debian Bug report #742169,
regar
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:10:48AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Probably worthwhile to make those !EXT4_OS_HURD checks likely()?
Yes, and I was planning on optimizing the checks a bit more, but it
makes sense to do that in a
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.13.5-1~bpo70+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This is an amd64 system running 32 bits 686-pae kernel
1G of RAM
I have not (can not) tested with full 64 bits system
qemu-kvm is working for some seconds then oops
I tried both qemu-kvm from wheezy and from wheezy-b
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Probably worthwhile to make those !EXT4_OS_HURD checks likely()?
Does it make sense to support the format at all given that it's unlikely
to get any testing?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: firmware-linux
Version: 0.41
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Trying to purge and reinstall firmwares after my boot being messed up
10 matches
Mail list logo
