On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:46:33AM -0600, gary mazzaferro wrote:
> HI,
>
> I was hoping someone can help me understand the difference between XEN
> kernel installed with the XEN package and the stock wheezy RC1 kernel ?
[...]
If you're referring to the xen-linux-system-* packages, these are
simp
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
> > OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> > willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
> Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> rejec
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:46 -0600, gary mazzaferro wrote:
> I was hoping someone can help me understand the difference between XEN
> kernel installed with the XEN package and the stock wheezy RC1
> kernel ?
There is no difference, there is no Xen flavour Linux kernel any more in
Wheezy, the -amd
HI,
I was hoping someone can help me understand the difference between XEN
kernel installed with the XEN package and the stock wheezy RC1 kernel ?
I was under the impressions, from Ian Campell's XEN/Debian presentation,
that XEN DomU was native in the wheezy kernel..
Ian's presentation:
http://p
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote:
> * DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could
> export accounts if requested.
> * Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to
> build official packages.
Did you get those answers from the relevant teams? Was
Hector Oron writes:
> Hello,
>
> 2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
>
>> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
>> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
>
> Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> reject the offer, it makes it ver
Hello,
2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a playground
machi
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:43:37 +0100
with message-id <1366976617.5955.2.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#703640: src:linux: [3.8 -> 3.8.1 regression]: Resume
from suspend stuck with framebuffer locking rework
has caused the Debian Bug report #703640,
regardi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 703640 - moreinfo
Bug #703640 [src:linux] src:linux: [3.8 -> 3.8.1 regression]: Resume from
suspend stuck with framebuffer locking rework
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #forgot to tag this bug, sorry!
> fixed 703640 3.8.5-1~experimental.1
Bug #703640 [src:linux] src:linux: [3.8 -> 3.8.1 regression]: Resume from
suspend stuck with framebuffer locking rework
Marked as fixed in versions linux/3.8.5-1~experimental.1
#forgot to tag this bug, sorry!
fixed 703640 3.8.5-1~experimental.1
thanks
Le 25/03/2013 13:33, Vincent Blut a écrit :
> Le samedi 23 mars 2013 à 22:10 +0100, Vincent Blut a écrit :
>> Le 23/03/2013 18:58, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>>> On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 14:28 +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
Le j
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.41-2~bpo60+1
Severity: important
VFAT Filesystem on a Lexar USB pendrive have grave errors on the root directory.
Mounting works fine.
Reading the secondary directory named PVR and its files works fine.
But trying to read the root directory of the USB pen by ls com
Uw e-mailaccount certificaat is verlopen op de 26-04-2013, kan dit onderbreken
e-mail levering configuratie en account POP-instellingen, pagina fout bij het
verzenden van berichten.Om opnieuw nieuwe webmail Certificaat, Neem even tijd
om uw administratie bij te werken door het volgen van de verw
13 matches
Mail list logo
