Processing of linux_3.2.41-2_multi.changes

2013-03-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux_3.2.41-2_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_3.2.41-2.dsc linux_3.2.41-2.debian.tar.xz linux-support-3.2.0-4_3.2.41-2_all.deb linux-doc-3.2_3.2.41-2_all.deb linux-manual-3.2_3.2.41-2_all.deb linux-source-3.2_3.2.41-2_all.deb Greetings,

Uploading linux (3.2.41-2)

2013-03-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Since 3.2.39-2 went into testing, it's about time for another upload. > There are many important bug fixes pending (still more bugs to fix, > though; in particular some more DRM regressions showed up). > > I'm intending to release 3.2.41 in

Bug#703280: linux: please include extract-vmlinux script in some binary package

2013-03-25 Thread Bob Bib
Sun, 17 Mar 2013, 16:32 -07:00 from Jonathan Nieder : > Hi Bob, > > Bob Bib wrote: > > > please include 'extract-vmlinux' script: > /scripts/extract-vmlinux > > in some Linux-related binary package; > > it allows extraction of a plain vmlinux from a compressed Linux kernel > image, > > in an easy

[bts-link] source package src:linux

2013-03-25 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #702885 (http://bugs.debian.org/702885) # Bug title: linux-image-3.8-trunk-amd64: Sa

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:linux

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian

Bug#703859: marked as done (initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU)

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:25:11 +0100 with message-id <2013-03-25t17-22...@devnull.michael-prokop.at> and subject line Re: Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU has caused the Debian Bug report

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Stefano Marinelli wrote: > Mmm...actually I was just looking at the initramfs.conf. I hadn't > noticed that the driver-policy was there and overriding it. Anyway, > I didn't touch it, so it's the default behaviour. The installer asks. And "most" is still t

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Stefano Marinelli
I'm going to change it and try. Yep, it works :) I still don't understand why deboostrap overrided this. Stefano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Stefano Marinelli
+ for i in '${EXTRA_CONF}' + '[' -d /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy ']' + '[' -e /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy ']' + . /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy ++ MODULES=dep [...] As pointed out by Ben (on IRC), you're using MODULES=dep. Mmm...actually I was just loo

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Prokop
* Stefano Marinelli [Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 03:59:46PM +0100]: > >That's strange. Please provide /tmp/log of running: > > sh -x /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs -o /tmp/initramfs 2>/tmp/log [...] > + for i in '${EXTRA_CONF}' > + '[' -d /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy ']' > + '[' -e /etc/initramfs-t

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Stefano Marinelli
Thanks, that looks ok-ish actually. Now what's the output of: lsinitramfs /tmp/initramfs | grep xen ? Nothing at all :( Stefano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Prokop
* Stefano Marinelli [Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 03:59:46PM +0100]: > >That's strange. Please provide /tmp/log of running: > > sh -x /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs -o /tmp/initramfs 2>/tmp/log > As it's 50 KB, attaching it. Thanks, that looks ok-ish actually. Now what's the output of: lsinitramfs /tmp/init

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Prokop
* Stefano Marinelli [Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 03:45:02PM +0100]: > >What does: > > lsinitramfs /boot/initrd* | grep xen > It doesn't show anything at all. Nothing about xen is present on my > initramfs. Ok. > >output for the initrd in question, Stefano? > >What initramfs-tools version with what c

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Stefano Marinelli
Hi, I agree that it should include xen-blkfront. I don't know why you mention xen-blkback though. Just because I noticed it was present on the self-generated domU initramfs. But maybe it's not useful at all. This should already be the case since we have: | copy_modules_dir kernel/driver

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Prokop
* Ben Hutchings [Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 01:57:47PM +]: > On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 14:24 +0100, Stefano Marinelli wrote: > > I investigated some more. After some tests, I found out what happens: > > * xen-create-image (from the package "xen-tools") just takes the dom0 > > kernel and initram and puts

Bug#691427: Reliably reproduce Lenovo 180GB SSD issues

2013-03-25 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi, We spent a couple of days cornering what appears to be an issue with the Intel 520 SSD drives in Lenovo x230 laptops. It was first showing up on a clean Debian installation, while installing a guest operating system into a VM. Looking around on forums, there appears to be some people having is

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 14:24 +0100, Stefano Marinelli wrote: > Hi, thank you for looking at this. > > > So you're using initramfs-tools 0.109 with kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64? > > Which linux-image-amd64 version exactly? > > > > And which combination of initramfs-tools and linux-image works for > > you? B

Processed: tagging 703506

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 703506 + pending Bug #703506 [src:linux] GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 703506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Stefano Marinelli
Hi, thank you for looking at this. So you're using initramfs-tools 0.109 with kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64? Which linux-image-amd64 version exactly? And which combination of initramfs-tools and linux-image works for you? Because AFAIK we haven't had any changes in initramfs-tools that could be responsi

Bug#703895: marked as done (KMS is broken with ATI Radeon 9100)

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:27:52 + with message-id <1364218072.3620.40.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#703895: KMS is broken with ATI Radeon 9100 has caused the Debian Bug report #703895, regarding KMS is broken with ATI Radeon 9100 to be marked as done.

Processed: reassign 703824 to src:linux, forcibly merging 703800 703824 703828

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 703824 src:linux 3.2.41-1 Bug #703824 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common: Directory /usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common/include is missing (Version 3.2.41-1) Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-3.2.0-4-

Bug#703895: KMS is broken with ATI Radeon 9100

2013-03-25 Thread Алексей Шилин
Source: linux Version: 3.2.39-2 Severity: important Dear maintainers, After recent re-enabling of KMS for ATI chips earlier than R600 [1], an old issue came back: colors are too bright on ATI Radeon 9100 (R200) with KMS enabled. See kernel bug 14945 [2]. The symptoms are: gray looks white, fonts

Processed (with 1 errors): reassign 703800 to src:linux, forcibly merging 703800 703824 703828

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 703800 src:linux 3.2.41-1 Bug #703800 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt: files missing [3.2.39-2 -> 3.2.41-1 regression] Bug #703812 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt: miss

Processed: notfound 701050 in linux/3.7.8-1~experimental.1, notfound 701050 in linux/3.2.35-2

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 701050 linux/3.7.8-1~experimental.1 Bug #701050 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Wrong battery capacity values on HP Folio 13-2000 No longer marked as found in versions linux/3.7.8-1~experimental.1. > notfoun

Bug#701050: marked as done (linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Wrong battery capacity values on HP Folio 13-2000)

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:08:28 + with message-id <1364216908.3620.35.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#701050: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Wrong battery capacity values on HP Folio 13-2000 has caused the Debian Bug report #701050, regarding linux-image-3.2

Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 703800 703824

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 703800 703824 Bug #703800 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt: files missing [3.2.39-2 -> 3.2.41-1 regression] Bug #703812 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt: missing /usr/s

Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 703800 703828

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 703800 703828 Bug #703800 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt: files missing [3.2.39-2 -> 3.2.41-1 regression] Bug #703812 [linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt] linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common-rt: missing /usr/s

Processed: severity of 703859 is important

2013-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 703859 important Bug #703859 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > End of message, stopping p

Bug#703640: src:linux: [3.8 -> 3.8.1 regression]: Resume from suspend stuck with framebuffer locking rework

2013-03-25 Thread Vincent Blut
Le samedi 23 mars 2013 à 22:10 +0100, Vincent Blut a écrit : > Le 23/03/2013 18:58, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > > On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 14:28 +0100, Vincent Blut wrote: > >> Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 21:56 +0100, Vincent Blut a écrit : > >>> Le jeudi 21 mars 2013 à 19:28 +0100, Vincent Blut a écrit : >

Bug#703640: src:linux: [3.8 -> 3.8.1 regression]: Resume from suspend stuck with framebuffer locking rework

2013-03-25 Thread Vincent Blut
Le samedi 23 mars 2013 à 22:41 +, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 22:10 +0100, Vincent Blut wrote: > > Le 23/03/2013 18:58, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > [...] > > > In any case, please do not use the reportbug --no-bug-script option, as > > > the kernel bug script provides lots of

Bug#701050: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Wrong battery capacity values on HP Folio 13-2000

2013-03-25 Thread Stefan Nagy
Am Donnerstag, den 21.02.2013, 00:50 + schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > while my BIOS/UEFI reports a battery charge capacity of 92% for my notebook- > > battery, upower still reports a charge capacity of 100% (AFAIK upower gets > > this > > information from the kernel - I believe this to be a kernel

Bug#703859: initramfs-tools: initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Prokop
severity 703859 important thanks * Stefano Marinelli [Mon Mar 25, 2013 at 12:03:47AM +0100]: > initramfs not including the xenblk-front (net, and back) modules, > so cannot boot any Debian Xen DomU using the same dom0 kernel. Not > having the same problem with an old (some months ago) wheezy > in