Bug#701148: linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: Regression - brightness controls do not work.

2013-02-21 Thread David Smith
Summary: 3.2.0-4-amd64 (Wheezy): Brightness controls work, get a popup indicator showing the brightness should be changing, dmesg says ACPI fails to switch the brightness. 3.6-trunk: Brightness controls work, get a popup indicator showing the brightness should be changing, dmesg says ACPI f

Processed: fsnotify locking fixes - backport to wheezy

2013-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #602966 [linux-2.6] linux-source-2.6.36: Oops while unmouning an USB key with FAT filesystem Added tag(s) patch. -- 602966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602966 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Processed: tagging 602966

2013-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 602966 + fixed-upstream Bug #602966 [linux-2.6] linux-source-2.6.36: Oops while unmouning an USB key with FAT filesystem Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 602966: h

Processed: Re: Bug#701148: linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: Regression - brightness controls do not work.

2013-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #701148 [src:linux] linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: Regression - brightness controls do not work. Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 701148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701148 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Bug#701148: linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: Regression - brightness controls do not work.

2013-02-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:31 +0800, David M Smith wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 3.7.8-1~experimental.1 > Severity: important > > > If I boot the linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64, the brightness controls work just > fine. > > Whenever I boot the linux-image-3.7-trunk-

Bug#701148: linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: Regression - brightness controls do not work.

2013-02-21 Thread David M Smith
Package: src:linux Version: 3.7.8-1~experimental.1 Severity: important If I boot the linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64, the brightness controls work just fine. Whenever I boot the linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64 my Fn+F4 and Fn+F5 brightness controls on my laptop do not work. According to xev, the events

Re: Bug#699367: an issue with crash(8) perhaps?

2013-02-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:21:56PM -0500, David Magda wrote: > On 2013-02-21 14:10, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >The squeeze kernel is unfortunately missing support for a lot of > >current hardware (notably graphics but also some networking chips) so > >many people are running later kernel versions. I

Re: Bug#699367: an issue with crash(8) perhaps?

2013-02-21 Thread David Magda
On 2013-02-21 14:10, Ben Hutchings wrote: The squeeze kernel is unfortunately missing support for a lot of current hardware (notably graphics but also some networking chips) so many people are running later kernel versions. I would love to fix some of these but I have my hands full and I can rar

Re: Bug#699367: an issue with crash(8) perhaps?

2013-02-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:39:04AM -0700, Troy Heber wrote: > On 02/21/13 09:22, David Magda wrote: > > > >>If it is the "crash", can we either get: > > >>(a) the patch added to squeeze package, and/or > > >>(b) wheezy crash backported. > > > > Any news on whether (a) or (b) will be done? Or is t

Re: Bug#699367: an issue with crash(8) perhaps?

2013-02-21 Thread Troy Heber
On 02/21/13 09:22, David Magda wrote: > >>If it is the "crash", can we either get: > >>(a) the patch added to squeeze package, and/or > >>(b) wheezy crash backported. > > Any news on whether (a) or (b) will be done? Or is there a (c) that > hasn't been considered perhaps? I haven't tried to push

[bts-link] source package src:linux

2013-02-21 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #697029 (http://bugs.debian.org/697029) # Bug title: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: i915

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2013-02-21 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #602966 (http://bugs.debian.org/602966) # Bug title: linux-source-2.6.36: Oops while

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:linux

2013-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2013-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian

Re: kdump-tools: default debug kernel search path is incorrect

2013-02-21 Thread David Magda
On 2013-02-12 09:07, David Magda wrote: In /usr/share/doc/kdump-tools/README.Debian the following text appears: 4. Debug Kernel You *should* have a debug kernel in order for makedumpfile to process the vmcore file. Without a debug kernel, the transfer process is reduced to using

Re: an issue with crash(8) perhaps?

2013-02-21 Thread David Magda
On 2013-01-31 00:17, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 14:50 -0500, David Magda wrote: The upstream bug report is at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/2011-June/thread.html#0 http://people.redhat.com/anderson/crash_patches/5.1.5-to-5.1.6.patch If it is the "crash",

Bug#701050: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Wrong battery capacity values on HP Folio 13-2000

2013-02-21 Thread Stefan Nagy
while my BIOS/UEFI reports a battery charge capacity of 92% for my notebook- battery, upower still reports a charge capacity of 100% (AFAIK upower gets this information from the kernel - I believe this to be a kernel ACPI bug). The kernel driver doesn't do anything very interesting so it's ac

Bug#700333: linux-image-3.7-trunk-amd64: Suspend to disk broken

2013-02-21 Thread Rohan Jain
Package: src:linux Version: 3.7.3-1~experimental.1 Followup-For: Bug #700333 Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Trying to do pm-hibernate with/without uswsusp installed. A black unresponsive screen, with no way to interrupt except forced turn off. This happens with th