Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.36
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
connecting to a wireless network N with wpa2 security enabled
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was ef
Janne Boman wrote:
> Got hit by this on the way...
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=60881
["Invalid release file: No entry for main/binary-amd64/Packages"]
>
> Testing halted until this is resolved
Yech. Is that reproducible? If so, please file an installation
report (i.e., a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692067 + pending
Bug #692067 [src:linux] linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: Early panic with 3.6.4 on
amd64
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
GRUB 2.00 has support for ZFS-on-Linux (the out-of-tree kernel module,
as opposed to the ZFS FUSE implementation). I wrote some of the code
that was added in 2.00; so that is where I fit into all this.
When booting off a ZFS root filesystem, GRUB sets this:
root=ZFS=pool_name/dataset/path
For a
You haven't sent this:
> > - The routing table (as shown by 'ip r') after each reconfiguration
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 02:53 +0400, jaakov jaakov wrote:
[...]
> Alas, "boot_delay=1000" does not slow down printing.
Sorry, I misunderstood where things were going wrong. Apparently the
kernel itself is booting just fine, but things go wrong later in the
boot sequence.
> It just introduces a pau
Got hit by this on the way...
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=60881
Testing halted until this is resolved
On Nov 1, 2012 11:04 AM, "Janne Boman" wrote:
> Ok, I'm going with this image: debian-wheezy-DI-b3-amd64-CD-1.iso
> (http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta3/amd
Luis Mochan wrote:
> I guess I made some mistake, as there are messages labeled uvesafb in
> all the boot attempts this afternoon.
Ah, I know what step I left out now. :/
It's
update-initramfs -u -k all
Sorry about that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian
I guess I made some mistake, as there are messages labeled uvesafb in
all the boot attempts this afternoon. Maybe I should have blacklisted
uvesafb besides commenting it out from
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules. I'll try this during the weekend later.
Regards,
Luis
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:57:19PM
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 599262 - fixed-upstream + moreinfo
Bug #599262 [linux-2.6] usbip: After detach remote usb device the system is
unusable
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Bug #599262 [linux-2.6] usbip: After detach remote usb device the system is
unusable
Adde
Hi,
willem kuyn wrote:
> [Subject: test information for linux-2.6.38-2]
>
> The freeze is not longer occurring in the latest kernel but
> after loading the module vhci_hcd there are a lot of messages
> in the kernel log.
> "INFO: task vhci_rx:xx blocked for more than 120 seconds."
> and
> "INFO:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 508866 src:linux linux-2.6/2.6.26-10
Bug #508866 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: NFS going stale for
stat() for renamed files like .Xauthority
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692067 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #692067 [src:linux] linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: Early panic with 3.6.4 on
amd64
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
tags 692067 + upstream fixed-upstream
quit
Robert Keevil wrote:
> On 01/11/12 20:10, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Thanks for reporting it. If you pass "mem=4G" on the kernel command line,
>> does that change anything? Thanks and sorry for the trouble, Jonathan
>
> It boots and runs fine with that op
On 01/11/12 20:10, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Thanks for reporting it. If you pass "mem=4G" on the kernel command
line, does that change anything? Thanks and sorry for the trouble,
Jonathan
It boots and runs fine with that option.
Thanks
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # regression
> severity 692067 important
Bug #692067 [src:linux] linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64: Early panic with 3.6.4 on
amd64
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
# regression
severity 692067 important
quit
Hi Robert,
Robert Keevil wrote:
> When booting linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64, I get the following:
>
> PANIC: early exception 0f rip 10:8136438d error 0 cr 2 0
Thanks for reporting it. If you pass "mem=4G" on the kernel command
line, does that
Luis Mochan wrote:
> I followed your instructions below and again got to a black screen and
> an unresponsive laptop. I had to use a recover disk to go back to the
> previous configuration. Would the /var/log/messages file be useful?
To avoid wasting the round-trip:
1. Yes, a kernel log from th
On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The above version has this fix and should be unblocked to enter
> testing in the next few days.
Great. Thanks for the update and for your help in polishing the fix a few
weeks ago.
--
Ed Cashin
ecas...@coraid.com
--
To UNSU
Your message dated Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:51:41 +
with message-id <20121101225141.gj13...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#692043: net: do not disable sg for packets requiring
no checksum
has caused the Debian Bug report #692043,
regarding net: do not disable sg for packets requiring no c
Luis Mochan wrote:
> I followed your instructions below and again got to a black screen and
> an unresponsive laptop. I had to use a recover disk to go back to the
> previous configuration. Would the /var/log/messages file be useful?
Yes, a kernel log of that boot would be useful.
Thanks,
Jonath
I followed your instructions below and again got to a black screen and
an unresponsive laptop. I had to use a recover disk to go back to the
previous configuration. Would the /var/log/messages file be useful?
Regards,
Luis
> Could you try nouveau again using this information? This experiment
>
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.6.4-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When booting linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64, I get the following:
PANIC: early exception 0f rip 10:8136438d error 0 cr 2 0
$ addr2line -fe /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-3.6-trunk-amd64 8136438d
arch_
Hi,
The second (B) bank of the 8gB set is working fine.
uptime is:
20:54:53 up 5 days, 9:18, 7 users, load average: 0.68, 0.56, 0.53
and i had no crashes, and right now i 've just tested also file transfer (via
tar + nc), to see if i have md5sums inconsistencies and it works good , no data
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> The following patch updates linux-tools trunk to 3.6 and works fine
> for me.
Thanks for applying it.
Ok to upload? There have been a couple of requests for a
linux-tools-3.6 package in experimental, and fixing #573483 means we
need linux-kbuild-3.6.
Hope that helps,
J
Your message dated Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:07:29 -0700
with message-id <20121101190729.GA8737@elie.Belkin>
and subject line Re: [3.3->3.4 regression] snd_hda_intel: no master volume
control
has caused the Debian Bug report #686640,
regarding linux/snd_hda_intel: no master volume control since 3.4
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 384922 src:linux linux-2.6/2.6.12-1
Bug #384922 [linux-2.6] Please support squash_gids option for NFS
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #384922 to the same values
prev
reassign 384922 src:linux linux-2.6/2.6.12-1
found 384922 linux/3.2.32-1
tags 384922 - fixed-upstream + wontfix upstream
quit
Hi again,
In February, Paul Szabo wrote:
>> Do I understand correctly that you are requesting an export or mountd
>> option filter_gid, which would behave like --manage-g
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 692025 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-46
Bug #692025 [linux] linux: internet connection refused after new route
Bug reassigned from package 'linux' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-image.
Ignoring request to alter fix
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #384922 (http://bugs.debian.org/384922)
# Bug title: Please support squash_gids opti
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #508866 (http://bugs.debian.org/508866)
# Bug title: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
On 11/01/2012 03:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:58 +0100, Patrik Nilsson wrote:
>> Package: linux
>> Version: linux-image
>
> Can we have a real version number please? (/proc/version will show the
> Debian package version for the running kernel).
>
Linux version 2.6.32
Your message dated Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:12:46 -0700
with message-id <20121101161246.GB5595@elie.Belkin>
and subject line Re: net: do not disable sg for packets requiring no checksum
has caused the Debian Bug report #692043,
regarding net: do not disable sg for packets requiring no checksum
to be mark
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.23-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
A regression appearing upstream after 2.6.38 (so not in squeeze) appears
in wheezy. The fix is in the upstream 3.2.y stable Linux kernel maintained
by Ben Hutchings, so it's probably on its way into wheezy, but I didn't
s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692025 + moreinfo
Bug #692025 [linux] linux: internet connection refused after new route
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692024 + pending
Bug #692024 [linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64] zram module is missing
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:58 +0100, Patrik Nilsson wrote:
> Package: linux
> Version: linux-image
Can we have a real version number please? (/proc/version will show the
Debian package version for the running kernel).
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> When one lan interface is connected
Your patches have no effect in the 64bit case (good). In the 32bit
case, they break ABI, so they are a no-go, unfortunately. The
userspace patch is especially dangerous, since it would make this
bug impossible to fix properly later.
The 2nd patch is set up to not break the ABI for 32bit usersp
Package: linux
Version: linux-image
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
When one lan interface is connected and you try to connect an other one,
often you can't connect to the Internet after that. You need to retry the
connection.
I suspect this bug is when a task (i.e. ntp, virus updater, ...) tr
Package: linux-image-3.6-trunk-amd64
Version: 3.6.4-1~experimental.1
Severity: important
zram module is missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/e408
--- On Tue, 10/30/12, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Thanks! To recap:
3.1.8-2 works fine
3.2.1-1 hung at "Loading, please wait..." once, worked fine twice
3.2.23-1 reliably hangs (though not always right away)
Could you try 3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1, to narrow down the range a
little? (If it doesn'
Ok, I'm going with this image: debian-wheezy-DI-b3-amd64-CD-1.iso
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta3/amd64/iso-cd/)
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> That would be great. If you have time for it, don't forget to file an
> installation report:
>
> http
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 502845 + open-iscsi
Bug #502845 [linux-2.6] open-iscsi: login fails using 64-bit kernel with 32-bit
userland
Added indication that 502845 affects open-iscsi
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Janne Boman wrote:
> I have a spare hard drive that I can swap in and install wheezy, would
> that be ok? That way we would be testing stock wheezy against this
> hardware
That would be great. If you have time for it, don't forget to file an
installation report:
http://www.debian.org/rele
Hi
sorry but I have a problem I cannot remember if I installed the
nvidia binary driver (installer from Nvidia site) or nvidia from
nonfree repo...
I have a spare hard drive that I can swap in and install wheezy, would
that be ok? That way we would be testing stock wheezy against this
hardware.
Hi Lisa,
Lisa Marie wrote:
> [Subject: (no subject)]
Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, where
a subject line can be very useful for providing context.
> Forwarding this:
> https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi/browse_thread/thread/7b44b4b57f01eb70?hl=en#
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 691977 linux
Bug #691977 [debian-installer] please add be2iscsi module to d-i image
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #691977 to the same values
previously set
Igno
48 matches
Mail list logo
