Bug#684352:

Miho:/home/david# rfkill list all 0: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 1: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no Miho:/home/david# When I turn off the Wifi using the network-manager-kde tool, rfkill then shows this: Miho:/home/d

Bug#684926: linux: disable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

Hi Ben. On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 21:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Is there any reasons why you've enabled CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE? > This is the recommended default (though not the actual default). Just a wild guess, but the help text could have just not been updated (as in many cases). An

Bug#684927: marked as done (linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:58:28 +0100 with message-id <20120814205828.gw1...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#684927: linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB has caused the Debian Bug report #684927, regarding linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG

Processed: tagging 684926

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 684926 + moreinfo Bug #684926 [src:linux] linux: disable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#684926: linux: disable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:56:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Source: linux > Severity: wishlist > > > Hi. > > Is there any reasons why you've enabled CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE? This is the recommended default (though not the actual default). > >From gcc: > > Optimize for size

Re: Can the Linux kernel host non-GNU userlands?

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:28:24AM -0700, Wendell P wrote: > This is really about Linux rather than Debian Linux, so please direct me > to a better forum if you know one. linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > Much is made (by some people) of the fact that GNU/Linux is the Linux > kernel plus the GNU us

Bug#684927: linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB

Source: linux Severity: wishlist Hi. Why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB. The former seems to be better and even the help text says it's the default choice. Cheers, Chris. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Arch

Bug#684926: linux: disable CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

Source: linux Severity: wishlist Hi. Is there any reasons why you've enabled CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE? >From the help: > Enabling this option will pass "-Os" instead of "-O2" to gcc resulting in a > smaller kernel. >From gcc: > Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do

Can the Linux kernel host non-GNU userlands?

This is really about Linux rather than Debian Linux, so please direct me to a better forum if you know one. Much is made (by some people) of the fact that GNU/Linux is the Linux kernel plus the GNU userland. There are projects to run GNU on different kernels, but what about hosting non-GNU userlan

Bug#656196: [2.6.39 -> 3.0 regression] kernel stalls every few days (rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU x)

Michael Below wrote: > Before I go on to test other kernels, one other possibility has appeared > to me: Maybe the 3.2 bug has been fixed through new CPU microcode? Is > that likely? Some days after installing the 3.4 kernel I noticed a > message about missing microcode and installed the relevant

Re: [PATCH] scripts/package/builddeb: upgrade to current practices

On Tuesday 2012-07-17 21:46, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >>> @@ -188,17 +188,17 @@ This is a packacked upstream version of the Linux >>> kernel. >>> The sources may be found at most Linux ftp sites, including: >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel >>> >>> -Copyright: 1991 - 2009 Linus Torvald

Bug#656196: [2.6.39 -> 3.0 regression] kernel stalls every few days (rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU x)

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 02.08.2012, 17:41 -0700 schrieb Jonathan Nieder: > > I upgraded the kernel to 3.4 from experimental, the stall warning > > doesn't appear anymore. At the same time, there are more "workaround" > > messages during USB startup: > > Thanks! > > Earlier I asked about whether

Re: ipset list, panic on 3.2.0-3-686-pae

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:31:20PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Please test the attached patch, following the instructions at > OK. I've tested it. It seems it helped for the panic. I'm unable to reproduce the bug a

Bug#684881: marked as done (linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: increasing hardware compatibility: enable firmware-less support for e100)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:24:56 +0100 with message-id <1344954296.824.202.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#684881: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: increasing hardware compatibility: enable firmware-less support for e100 has caused the Debian Bug report #684881, re

Processed: fixed 684881 in 3.2.23-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 684881 3.2.23-1 Bug #684881 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: increasing hardware compatibility: enable firmware-less support for e100 Marked as fixed in versions linux/3.2.23-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#684881: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: increasing hardware compatibility: enable firmware-less support for e100

On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 14:06 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 3.2.21-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Hello kernel team! > > I understand you plan at least one more kernel version > before wheezy. Probably quite a few. > Please consider backporting > > 8b0d2f9 n

Bug#684881: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: increasing hardware compatibility: enable firmware-less support for e100

Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.21-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello kernel team! I understand you plan at least one more kernel version before wheezy. Please consider backporting 8b0d2f9 net: e100: ucode is optional in some cases currently

Bug#684623: Missing dependency makes package not usable

>> Dear maintainer, >> trying to install the headers for 3.5 on Debian Wheezy I've noticed, >> the package linux-kbuild-3.5 is not available in the repository. Are >> there any problems with linux-tools for 3.5? > [...] > > I haven't got round to updating it for 3.5. It will need some changes. OK