On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:39:14 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> A way to confirm if the slowkeys feature is currently engaged would
> allow me to confirm this more directly next time.
>
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=4af8e22b1a539778388fe509a7f3a25860a7879c
is in the X server in sid
sry forgot lsusb
# lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 003 Device 002: I
patch kernel 3.2.0-3 , add bluetooth 0489:e046 Foxconn / Hon Hai
# uname -r
3.2.0-3-amd64
# lsb_release -a
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy)
Release:testing
Codename:wheezy
# usb-devices
T: Bus=03 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=02 Cnt=03 Dev#= 7 Spd=12
+++ Vincent Lefevre [2012-07-20 08:58 +0200]:
> On 2012-07-20 08:31:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Sounds like you have slowkeys enabled.
> > http://who-t.blogspot.fr/2012/06/xkb-slowkeys.html
>
> So, it would seem that some part of the system would enable SlowKeys
> in my back for one of the
On 2012-07-26 21:31:44 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> BTW, is it only me, or do you have to hold down the key significantly
> longer to turn the "feature" off than to turn it on? It certainly feels
> like it.
No, it seems 10 seconds in both cases.
> > * When the bug occurred in my case, I don't thin
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> On 2012-07-20 08:58:57 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> So, it would seem that some part of the system would enable SlowKeys
>> in my back for one of the keyboards (I recall that when this happens
>> while I'm using the USB keyboard, only the USB keyboard is affected,
>>
A series of 11 patches that fix the June 30 leapsecond issue, by John
Stultz, Thomas Gleixner, and Richard Cochran, were committed to the
3.2.24 kernel source on July 17. Can this package be updated to include
that version of the kernel - or can those patches be applied here?
Discussion at
Jonathan Nieder 2012-07-21 12:04:
tags 682007 + upstream patch moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Brian Kroth wrote:
kernel BUG at
/build/buildd-linux_3.2.20-1~bpo60+1-amd64-tQMw4f/linux-3.2.20/fs/buffer.c:3088!
This is
BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)); \
in
static
Jonathan Nieder 2012-07-20 11:25:
merge 682116 682007
quit
Hi,
Ben Hutchings 2012-07-19 13:32:
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
We don't support proprietary stuff. Please remove and try again.
To be clear, Bastian is referring to the proprietary kernel module
(nvi
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 03:06:05 +0100
> I didn't say the timeout was ignored; I said the time limit was
> increased. If a driver sets a time limit for some hardware operation
> which is shorter than the hardware may require to complete it
> successfully, increasing the time li
On 07/26/2012 05:18 PM, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
> Since the bug does not seem to be as systematic as I originally thought,
> I set the severity back to the one set by the bug reporter.
Even if that was not the case, NFS is not only about NFS4 or use with
krb5, so anything above important is wrong
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #584830 (http://bugs.debian.org/584830)
# Bug title: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: USB
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #680707 (http://bugs.debian.org/680707)
# Bug title: Asus P5NSLI: lockup on resume f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 682709 important
Bug #682709 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: NFS4 krb5 mounts hang under
nfs-utils 1.2.6-3
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
severity 682709 important
thanks
For a reason I don't understand, after the last reboot of the server and
client, everything works again. I suspect the last configuration changes
(before my previous email) did not propagate correctly because of some
caching (or some other reason that would go beyo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 682709 grave
Bug #682709 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: NFS4 krb5 mounts hang under
nfs-utils 1.2.6-3
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6827
severity 682709 grave
thanks
Hi,
I am affected by the same bug. I have raised the severity of the bug to
grave because it makes NFSv4 mount with kerberos unusable.
Cheers,
Nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Does this message mean Adaptec drivers are one big miserable piece of crap and
can't be used on virtualized platforms? Does this mean RAID hardware products
supplied by Adaptec / PMC are faulty and won't work on any Linux virtual
platform at all?
I'm just trying to bring this to attention of P
Caro Webmail / Conta de Usuário E-mail
Estamos atualizando nosso banco de dados e e-mail centro conta. Estamos a
excluir todas as contas de webmail não utilizados e criar mais espaço para
novas contas. Para garantir que você não experimenta interrupção do serviço
durante este período, por favor
19 matches
Mail list logo
