Paolo Sala wrote:
> I know, I have a SiI 3124 too and I know the sensivity problem...
>
> Well, what I have to test? I try a stable, testing or sid?
Whatever is most convenient. Testing a 3.x.y kernel (3.2.y or 3.4.y
from sid, experimental, or squeeze-backports) would be most useful.
Thanks,
Jo
Jonathan Nieder scrisse in data 12/06/2012 20:23:
> Paolo Sala wrote:
>
>
>> no but I've the controller! If you want I can try to test it...
>>
> Yes, that would be interesting. Keep in mind that, as Tejun Heo
> wrote,
>
I know, I have a SiI 3124 too and I know the sensivity problem...
Hi again,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-06-12 15:52:52 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Even better would be full "dmesg" output from booting and
>> reproducing the bug.
>
> Attached.
Thanks for your help on this. No clues, just as you guessed (but
thanks for the log).
I assume the X log do
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Christian Ohm wrote:
>> [310034.551037] zsmalloc: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.
[...]
>> * Proprietary module has been loaded.
>
> Can you reproduce this without said proprietary module (for example by
> blacklisting it in /etc/modprobe.d)?
Oh, hold on a se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 677273 + moreinfo
Bug #677273 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.4-trunk-amd64: zram doesn't work because
it's missing zcache
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677273: http://bugs.d
tags 677273 + moreinfo
quit
Hi Christian,
Christian Ohm wrote:
> Trying to modprobe the zram module, the following happens:
>
> # modprobe zram
> ERROR: could not insert 'zram': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown
> parameter (see dmesg)
>
> # dmesg
> [310034.551024] zsmalloc: module is from t
Hi, over the past week or two I've been working on bootstrapping Debian
packages for x32. As of now, linux-libc-dev is the last remaining package
before I have enough built (at least with by-hand builds) to be able to do a
debootstrap.
So, I've been trying to add x32 support to the linux-2.6 v
Hi,
Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Well, I was very reluctant to go to the trouble of putting it back, but
> when I did the machine recognizes it again. This is getting very,
> very weird.
Just sounds like a race condition to me.
[...]
> I also found that after running 3.2 even in "recovery" m
Well, I was very reluctant to go to the trouble of putting it back, but
when I did the machine recognizes it again. This is getting very,
very weird. There was no sign of it the last time it was installed. Maybe
this is related to the other weird hardware effects of the backported
kernel? I also fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 668211 - moreinfo
Bug #668211 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: Genius iSlim 1300 V2
webcam not working since 2.6.39
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> # regression
> severity 668211 important
Bug #668211 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-p
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:10:02 PM UTC+5:30, Peter Baranyi wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 04:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It's also possible that the problem could be on the display side, since
> > video is usually displayed differently from other graphics. Are you
> > able to play video files succe
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 21:39:29 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Peculiar. Do you have a kernel log from when this happened?
>
> There is nothing in the kernel log (only when I unplug / plug the
> keyboard).
Do you mind showing a few lines of this nothing (i.e., a few lines
befor
Timeouts occurred sporadically, but usually at least several times a day. It
seemed to occur most often when there was noise on the frequency---when other
wifi users would set up near me and connect to the same access point. Usually
around mid-day, I would get a noise timeout every 20 minutes.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.4.1-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Trying to modprobe the zram module, the following happens:
# modprobe zram
ERROR: could not insert 'zram': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter
(see dmesg)
# dmesg
[310034.551024] zsmalloc: module is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # REX ABERT wrote:
> #
> # > I've been running the patched kernel for 32 hours now without a timeout.
> tags 611107 - moreinfo
Bug #611107 [linux-2.6] ath5k: noise floor calibration timeout
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping proce
Jonathan-
I've been running the patched kernel for 32 hours now without a timeout. I saw
that one of the patches is using the old madwifi code. A few years back I was
running Fedora with the madwifi driver for my card, and I did not have this
issue at that time.
BTW, I had patched the kernel
REX ABERT wrote:
> I've been running the patched kernel for 32 hours now without a
> timeout.
Thanks. How often did the timeouts occur before?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
On 20/05/12 12:32, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Adrian Fita wrote:
>
>> Hi. I wanted to let you know that I just upgraded to kernel 3.2.17 which
>> landed in testing and the issue is still present. I'm holding my fingers
>> crossed for the next version...
>
> Alas, the patch isn't in
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 22:20 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:05:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >On 23.05.2012 19:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>>With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringin
Forwarding with permission.
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry for Not getting back with you on this issue earlier..I have been crazy
busy at work.
that being said, here are my findings..
First the patch worked with out issue and was able to spin the drives with no
problem. We were being effected by a
Paolo Sala wrote:
> no but I've the controller! If you want I can try to test it...
Yes, that would be interesting. Keep in mind that, as Tejun Heo
wrote,
| It seems that
| these simg chips are sensitive to PCI signal quality and s
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:10:58 +0100
with message-id <20120612181058.gg2...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#677253: please make firmware package versioned for
co-installability
has caused the Debian Bug report #677253,
regarding please make firmware package versioned for co
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 18:15:26 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: firmware-nonfree
> Severity: wishlist
>
> most firmware works with a certain range of kernel versions. if that
> range is not big enough to include stable and testing, then, once one is
> using backports, one can no longer r
On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I don't care as long as nobody is going to get in the way of an
> urgency=high upload of firmware-nonfree to stable-proposed-updates or
> stable-updates.
there have been updates of firmware-* packages in the past and more
recently for sq
Accepted:
firmware-atheros_0.36_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-atheros_0.36_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.36_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.36_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.36_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.36_all.deb
firmware-brcm8021
Package: firmware-nonfree
Severity: wishlist
most firmware works with a certain range of kernel versions. if that
range is not big enough to include stable and testing, then, once one is
using backports, one can no longer reasonably use the older kernel.
practical example: on a squeeze system tha
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675425: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #675425,
regarding please update iwlwifi firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664762: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #664762,
regarding firmware-bnx2 missing new firmware files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658123: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #658123,
regarding [firmware-iwlwifi] Please update Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6230
firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > so what is the point of adding it to firmware-nonfree?
>
> it would be nice to have everything in one place (= one src package),
> than to have things split over several, make the firmware stuff be
> updated all at once, and better integrated (by usin
firmware-nonfree_0.36_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.36.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.36.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.36_all.deb
firmware-atheros_0.36_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.36_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.36_all.deb
firmware-brcm80211_0.36_
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 15:53 +0100, Michael Moritz wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-45
> Severity: minor
>
> I have just installed this machine and testing btrfs for 2 drives
> (each 2TB, configured with raid1 metadata, raid0 data)
[...]
btrfs is experimental in this kernel version.
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:22:52 +0100
with message-id <1339514572.4942.30.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Please upload new firmware packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #674435,
regarding Please upload new firmware packages
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-45
Severity: minor
I have just installed this machine and testing btrfs for 2 drives (each 2TB,
configured with raid1 metadata, raid0 data)
I noticed these kernel oops in dmes
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-45
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 675425 + pending
Bug #675425 [firmware-iwlwifi] please update iwlwifi firmware
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
675425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 664762 + pending
Bug #664762 [firmware-bnx2] firmware-bnx2 missing new firmware files
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 658123 + pending
Bug #658123 [firmware-iwlwifi] [firmware-iwlwifi] Please update Intel Centrino
Advanced-N 6230 firmware
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658123: http://b
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 08:34 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > On 06/10/2012 04:31 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode
> > > definitions
> > > for all AMD AMD64 processo
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:47:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Some hardware support; this can still be done after the freeze but the
> sooner the better:
>
> - [armhf] omapdrm driver
> - [x86] gma500 support for new chips
> - [x86] i915 improvements in Ivy Bridge support
> - radeon support for
On 06/12/2012 01:34 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> However, amd64-microcode has a different upstream
iirc so do the different firmware parts that src:firmware-nonfree builds.
> and it would already
> have to generate a separate binary package anyway for license reasons,
iirc so are the
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 04:31 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode definitions
> > for all AMD AMD64 processors.
>
> i'm aware that there's the intel-microcode package, however, why not
> integ
Excerpts from intrigeri's message of Mon Jun 11 15:42:59 +0200 2012:
> Hi,
>
> Michal Suchanek wrote (05 Aug 2011 12:08:37 GMT) :
> > At the very least the libc nss modules are required in intramfs to
> > get dns lookup for netbooting. Splashscreen solutions like plymouth
> > might need some of th
Jonathan Nieder scrisse in data 21/05/2012 23:39:
> Thanks for the pointer. Looks like upstream's given up, alas.
>
> Now I'm curious:
>
> - do you still have access to this system?
>
no but I've the controller! If you want I can try to test it...
Piviul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On 2012-06-11 21:39:29 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > I have a USB keyboard attached to my laptop, and I use it as the main
> > keyboard. I was using it, and suddenly it no longer worked at all (for
> > instance, xev didn't report any event). The device was s
44 matches
Mail list logo
