Bug#653669: marked as done (btrfs - kernel oops (extent-tree.c:5711))

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:14:49 +0100 with message-id <1338614089.3979.33.camel@deadeye> and subject line Re: Installation works now has caused the Debian Bug report #653669, regarding btrfs - kernel oops (extent-tree.c:5711) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processed: fixed 653669 in 3.2.18-1

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 653669 3.2.18-1 Bug #653669 [linux-2.6] btrfs - kernel oops (extent-tree.c:5711) There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '3.2.18-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '3.2.18-1' Marked as

Bug#653669: Installation works now

2012-06-01 Thread Bernhard
Hello, Yesterday, i have tested the installation on a btrfs filesystem. It works now. After the first boot of the new installed Debian sid, the startup abort. Reason is: the tool for checking the btrfs filesystem with fsck is missing. One thing, i have observed during installation: The installat

Bug#556433: [squeeze] 3c59x: NETDEV WATCHDOG: transmit timed out

2012-06-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 20:28 -0500, Steve Karg wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > > Friendly ping. :) The 3.x.y kernel from sid or squeeze-backports > > should work fine on a squeeze system. The only packages needed from > > outside squeeze to try it are the kernel image itself, linux-base, and > > initra

Bug#556433: [squeeze] 3c59x: NETDEV WATCHDOG: transmit timed out

2012-06-01 Thread Steve Karg
Hi Jonathan, > Friendly ping. :)  The 3.x.y kernel from sid or squeeze-backports > should work fine on a squeeze system.  The only packages needed from > outside squeeze to try it are the kernel image itself, linux-base, and > initramfs-tools. I used linux-image-3.2.0-2-486 from unstable, but had

Bug#516785: Bug #516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2012-06-01 Thread Aron Xu
Hi Hermann, Is it possible to describe the detailed physical status of all the two CPU/Memory boards? I would like to know which Slots do you place your CPUs and which memory module groups are installed (and how much) on both of the CPU/Memory boards. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#516785: Bug #516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2012-06-01 Thread Aron Xu
Here is some more information of our machine FYI. Attached dmesg_20120322T184612.txt is the dmesg generated during boot of the machine on Mar 22, 2012, which is the date we did our last reboot and put it into production. The machine has 14GB RAM, that is 512MB*(16+12). Because there is one broken

Processed: Re: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 664767 linux-2.6/3.2.17-1 Bug #664767 [linux-2.6] Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression? Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.17-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664767: h

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-01 Thread Camaleón
El 2012-06-01 a las 12:42 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió: > Camaleón wrote: > > > I'd like to add a comment because I think it can be relevant... since > > the latest stock kernel update (3.2.18-1) a couple of days ago coming > > from the usual wheezy set of upgrades (I mean, with no additional >

Bug#516785: Bug #516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2012-06-01 Thread Aron Xu
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Hermann Lauer wrote: > > Aron, do you have a Sun Fire 480R ? If yes, I'm interested in getting a > running binary kernel from > you to rule out configuration and compiler issues. > I have remote ssh access (root) to that running SunFire 408R, what can I do to hel

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Camaleón wrote: > I'd like to add a comment because I think it can be relevant... since > the latest stock kernel update (3.2.18-1) a couple of days ago coming > from the usual wheezy set of upgrades (I mean, with no additional > patches applied) "brcmsmac" driver seems to run also stable with no

Bug#664767: Brcmsmac driver woes, possible regression?

2012-06-01 Thread Camaleón
2012/5/30 Jonathan Nieder : >> Anyway, after having loaded kernel 3.2.19 (with the set of patches >> applied) for all the weekend and until today, I've experienced NO >> reconnects nor random connection downs which means the wireless link >> runs stable and at least it's usable here :-) > > Nice.

linux-2.6_3.2.19-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.diff.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.diff.gz linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.dsc to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.dsc linux-2.6_3.2.19.orig.tar.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.2.19.orig.tar.gz linux-doc-3.2_3.2.19-1_all.deb to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc

Processing of linux-2.6_3.2.19-1_multi.changes

2012-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-2.6_3.2.19-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.dsc linux-2.6_3.2.19.orig.tar.gz linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.diff.gz linux-support-3.2.0-2_3.2.19-1_all.deb linux-patch-debian-3.2_3.2.19-1_all.deb linux-source-3.2_3.2.19-1_all.deb lin

Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

2012-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.diff.gz linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.dsc linux-2.6_3.2.19.orig.tar.gz This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives w

Processed: Re: [regression 3.2->3.3.4] sata_sil (on sil 3512) hotplug broken again

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # v3.4-rc4~32^2 (libata: forbid port runtime pm by default, fixing > # regression, 2012-04-18) > tags 671689 + pending fixed-upstream Bug #671689 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.3.0-trunk-686-pae: sata_sil (on sil 3512) hotplug broken again Added tag(s

Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

2012-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: linux-2.6_3.2.19-1.dsc linux-2.6_3.2.19.orig.tar.gz This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:26:45, the files wil

Bug#499752: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Seagate STT20000A no longer works in 2.6.26)

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:53:58 -0500 with message-id <20120601155358.GA31394@burratino> and subject line Re: [2.6.25 -> 2.6.26 regression] ide_tape: Seagate STT2A no longer works has caused the Debian Bug report #499752, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Seagate STT2A no lon

Bug#388453: [lenny] irq 201: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

2012-06-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Vincent, Vincent Zweije wrote: > I've monitored it a little until a few months ago, and hadn't gone. > > Anyway, it's not critical, because the system keeps running. It's just > a remarkable error message. Thanks again for reporting this and sorry for the long quiet. Do you still access to t

Bug#375092: marked as done ([powerpc] kernel 2.6 IPS driver failure with IBM ServeRAID 4H adapter)

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:16:50 -0500 with message-id <20120601151650.GA30868@burratino> and subject line Re: [powerpc] kernel 2.6 IPS driver failure with IBM ServeRAID 4H adapter has caused the Debian Bug report #375092, regarding [powerpc] kernel 2.6 IPS driver failure with IBM Serve

Bug#516785: Bug #516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2012-06-01 Thread Hermann Lauer
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:22:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 15:42 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > > I can confirm that Debian Squeeze 6.0.4, with kernel > > linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64-smp, version 2.6.32-41 or > > 2.6.32-41squeeze2, does not crash anymore. The installation proc

Bug#675493: linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Include 3.3 patches to fix I/O stalls on slow disks when using transparant hugepages

2012-06-01 Thread Frederik Himpe
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.18-1 Severity: normal When transparant hugepages is used, this can cause I/O stalls on slow USB devices: https://lwn.net/Articles/467328/ Following patches from Linux 3.3 fix this problem. You might consider including them in the Wheezy kernel. https://git.kernel.

Bug#672431: marked as done (linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: kernel is randomly hang, with or without error. degraded from 3.2.0-maybe 3.2.7. v3.3.5-ubuntu is stable)

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:35:56 +0100 with message-id <1338554156.708.67.camel@deadeye> and subject line Re: Bug#672431: report has caused the Debian Bug report #672431, regarding linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: kernel is randomly hang, with or without error. degraded from 3.2.0-maybe 3.

initramfs-tools 0.103

2012-06-01 Thread Dr. Markus Waldeck
Dear Debian kernel team, > Depends: ..., module-init-tools, Please change the dependency from module-init-tools to kmod. ii module-init-tools 8-2 transitional dummy package (module-init-tools to kmod) Thanks! Dr. Markus Waldeck -- NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!

Bug#674411: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686: Kernel crashes if AIO is used on pages belonging to guests

2012-06-01 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:37 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:57 +, George Dunlap wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 2.6.32-45 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > The kernel version in this package does not handl

Re: amd64 as default architecture

2012-06-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 11:59 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes: > > > On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 11:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Ben Hutchings writes: > >> > Eventually (wheezy+2? +3?) we would stop building a kernel package for > >> > i386. > >> > >> As in drop

Re: amd64 as default architecture

2012-06-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ben Hutchings writes: > On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 11:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Ben Hutchings writes: >> > Eventually (wheezy+2? +3?) we would stop building a kernel package for >> > i386. >> >> As in drop the i386 arch? > > No, keep i386 userland only. Though we might consider reduc

Processed (with 2 errors): still stale filehandles in 3.2 for atomically renamed files

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 508866 > reassign 508866 linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 Bug #508866 [linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: NFS going stale for stat() for renamed files like .Xauthority Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64' Bu

Processed: Re: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 675302 linux-2.6/3.3.6-1~experimental.1 Bug #675302 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: system totally hands when using nouveau Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.3.6-1~experimental.1. > affects 675302 + xserver-xorg-video-nouveau B

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-06-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
found 675302 linux-2.6/3.3.6-1~experimental.1 affects 675302 + xserver-xorg-video-nouveau forwarded 675302 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/50571 quit Gedalya wrote: > Bug 50571 - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50571 Thanks! If I have any more questions, I'll just ask them upstream.

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-06-01 Thread Gedalya
On 6/1/2012 2:47 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Ok, one more test and we should take this upstream: can you reproduce this with a 3.3.y or newer kernel from experimental? If so, please report this at, product Xorg, component Driver/nouveau (yes, that's where they track