Accepted:
nfs-common_1.2.6-2_i386.deb
to main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_1.2.6-2_i386.deb
nfs-kernel-server_1.2.6-2_i386.deb
to main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_1.2.6-2_i386.deb
nfs-utils_1.2.6-2.debian.tar.bz2
to main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.2.6-2.debian.tar.bz2
nfs-utils_1.2.6-2.dsc
to m
nfs-utils_1.2.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nfs-utils_1.2.6-2.dsc
nfs-utils_1.2.6-2.debian.tar.bz2
nfs-kernel-server_1.2.6-2_i386.deb
nfs-common_1.2.6-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
-
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:02:05PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
[...]
> Changes:
> nfs-utils (1:1.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * New upstream version
> - Remove 18-dont-use-PAGE_SIZE.patch: merged upstream.
> - Update other patches.
> - Install osd_login (part of the autolo
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 19:10:12 -0500
with message-id <20120526001011.GA3296@burratino>
and subject line Re: Monitor EDID not recognized by Linux kernel 3.x on AMD A6
CPU
has caused the Debian Bug report #656015,
regarding base: Monitor EDID not recognized by Linux kernel 3.x on AMD A
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Version: 3.2.18-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 656015 - moreinfo
Bug #656015 [linux-2.6] base: Monitor EDID not recognized by Linux kernel 3.x
on AMD A6 CPU
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
In package linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64, version 3.2.18-1, the bug seems to
be fixed.
Sorry for not being able to check for it for so long a time.
Grigor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
Hi again,
Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> The kernel team seem to be unable to find the cause with the info I gave
> them. Since AFAICT I have nothing more to give them (will check later) and
> since it has been quite a long while, I think it's best the bug remain
> closed. What's more, this old
Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> Please redirect to the BTS if you think it's relevant. :-)
Thanks, doing so.
--- Begin Message ---
Yeah, sorry about that. Debian insist on running the craptastic procmail, and
since it doesn't like my primary email address,I had to rewrite it. Except I
rewrote i
found 665493 linux-2.6/3.2.17-1
quit
Hi Jeroen,
Jeroen Nijhof wrote:
> [Subject: Bug#665493: The problem is hotplug acpi]
Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, so
a subject line can help a lot in providing valuable context.
[...]
> on my HP Pavilion dv6 laptop, l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 665493 linux-2.6/3.2.17-1
Bug #665493 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: kernel fails to boot
completely (timeout on modprobe -b pci:)
Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.17-1.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Accepted:
nfs-common_1.2.6-1_i386.deb
to main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_1.2.6-1_i386.deb
nfs-kernel-server_1.2.6-1_i386.deb
to main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_1.2.6-1_i386.deb
nfs-utils_1.2.6-1.debian.tar.bz2
to main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.2.6-1.debian.tar.bz2
nfs-utils_1.2.6-1.dsc
to m
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 21:02:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673798: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #673798,
regarding nfs-kernel-server: Check for blank exports file, not just existence
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
nfs-utils_1.2.6-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nfs-utils_1.2.6-1.dsc
nfs-utils_1.2.6.orig.tar.bz2
nfs-utils_1.2.6-1.debian.tar.bz2
nfs-kernel-server_1.2.6-1_i386.deb
nfs-common_1.2.6-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
Damien Martins writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> I'm the one who posted this problem on QNAP's forum. I got your debian
> package and I thank you for this.
> When doing a 'dpkg -i
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x_2.6.6~bug673107_armel.deb'
> I got the following error :
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x depends
Thanks Guillaume! No rush, I just wanted to make sure I hadn't dropped
the ball on a bug report.
Sarah Sharp
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:42:31AM +0200, Guillaume Jaouen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm really sorry but I had no time yet for tracking this bug.
>
> As requested, I will build the last kernel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 672891 - patch pending
Bug #672891 [linux-2.6] brcmsmac wireless brcms_c_wait_for_tx_completion warning
Removed tag(s) pending and patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
672891: http:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 672891 linux-2.6/3.2.18-1
Bug #672891 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] brcmsmac
wireless brcms_c_wait_for_tx_completion warning
Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.18-1; no longer marked as fixed in
versions linux-2.6/3.2.18-1 and
found 672891 linux-2.6/3.2.18-1
quit
Touko Korpela wrote:
> (last followup was sent to cloned bug by mistake)
> Hard to say if it made difference, maybe made it more rare.
> Logs show only a few this kind of warnings in last weeks running 3.2.1x
[...]
> But should this bug be opened again?
Yep,
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:34:07AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> > Here is log from 3.2.18-1 kernel with X125 laptop. WARNING is there.
> [...]
> > Linux version 3.2.0-2-686-pae (Debian 3.2.18-1)
> > (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4
Hi,
Touko Korpela wrote:
> Here is log from 3.2.18-1 kernel with X125 laptop. WARNING is there.
[...]
> Linux version 3.2.0-2-686-pae (Debian 3.2.18-1)
> (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-5) ) #1 SMP
> Mon May 21 18:24:12 UTC 2012
[...]
> [ cut here ]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # hardware support
> severity 674565 important
Bug #674565 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Bluetooth activation failed
(btusb module)
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> tags 674565 + upstream patch moreinfo
Bug #674565 [linux-2.6]
# hardware support
severity 674565 important
tags 674565 + upstream patch moreinfo
quit
Hi Arief,
Arief M Utama wrote:
> This is a minor but annoying bug,
> btusb on my HP Envy 15 laptop failed to activate bluetooth,
> since it lacks the appropriate usb_device_id entry.
>
> I would propose addin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 674430 brcmsmac: ieee80211 phy0: AMPDU status: BA Timeout, seq 152,
> in_transit 0
Bug #674430 [linux-2.6] brcmsmac wireless brcms_c_wait_for_tx_completion warning
Changed Bug title to 'brcmsmac: ieee80211 phy0: AMPDU status: BA Timeout,
Hello,
klibc 2.0 release is imminent and will be uploaded
shortly afterwards. It features proper buffered stdio.
I'll blog in more details about the new features.
It breaks current initramfs-tools due to /run migration.
I'll coordinate the fixing upload.
sunny greetings
--
maks
signature.asc
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.18-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
This is a minor but annoying bug,
btusb on my HP Envy 15 laptop failed to activate bluetooth,
since it lacks the appropriate usb_device_id entry.
I would propose adding the entry for more convinience and usabilit
Package : linux-image-3.3.0-trunk-686-pae
I haas installed the above package & tried to enable the bluetooth but
it is not detecting.
I got the error in dmesg " failed to initiate "
The bluetooth card is Atheros AR5BBU22.
& it uses the module ath3k.
--
bossganesh
BOSSTeam
CDAC
--
To UNS
Hi,
I'm the one who posted this problem on QNAP's forum. I got your debian
package and I thank you for this.
When doing a 'dpkg -i
linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x_2.6.6~bug673107_armel.deb'
I got the following error :
linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x depends on linux-base (>=
2.6.32-46~bug673107); h
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:21:49 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:30:02PM +0200, Olaf Ruehenbeck wrote:
> > Package: general
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: squeeze
> [...]
>
> The correct package name to use when reporting a bug in the kernel
> is 'linux-image-' followed by
On Monday 26 December 2011 12:52 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I have a similar laptop, a T400, and I have been seeing the same
> problem lately.
>
> This is not a laptop-mode-tools bug. It is believed to be a kernel bug
> in the cpufreq driver.
>
> To confirm, could you try to reproduce the prob
29 matches
Mail list logo
