Hi Juha,
>Mar 22 20:13:47 rigel kernel: [1259943.614216] iwlwifi :03:00.0: RF_KILL
>bit toggled to disable radio.
>Mar 22 20:13:47 rigel kernel: [1259943.614350] iwlwifi :03:00.0: Not
>sending command - RF KILL
[MV] These are not technically error messages, and we had a patch fixing thes
This may or may not be related, but I thought it best to inform you about what
I just saw anyway:
I accidentally toggled the physical RF kill switch on my laptop and the result
was very much reminiscent of the bug we are discussing (note the QoS and
failure to remove key):
Mar 22 20:13:47 rige
Hello, folks--
This bug looks like it may be the same as #649735, which was fixed a
couple of days ago in 3.2.12-1:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649735
I've yet to try it out myself, but I hope this helps!
--branen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@li
Hi, ÐлаÑов СеÑгей wrote:
I remove all fglrx componets, unmask radeon and reboot.
Blank screen again ("no signal on monitor, and monitor off).
What kind of monitor is this, and how is it attached? If you start X
(using the radeon or fbdev driver), does the screen become visible
again
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #661335 (http://bugs.debian.org/661335)
# Bug title: linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64: No H
Hi,
Платов Сергей wrote:
> I remove all fglrx componets, unmask radeon and reboot.
> Blank screen again ("no signal on monitor, and monitor off).
What kind of monitor is this, and how is it attached? If you start X
(using the radeon or fbdev driver), does the screen become visible
again?
--
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-41
In a vserver based virtual machine /proc/meminfo shows incorrect values
of Buffers memory:
root@node2:~# uname -a
Linux node2 2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 19:31:31 UTC 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@node2:~# vserver vm ent
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 663597 + pending
Bug #663597 {Done: Bastian Blank } [src:linux-2.6]
linux-headers-3.2.0-1-common: Bad symlink
/lib/modules/3.2.0-1-amd64/source/Kbuild
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #663597 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
St
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 663433 + pending
Bug #663433 {Done: Bastian Blank } [linux-2.6] udev: does not
load acpiphp on ThinkPad T520 although it is needed for ExpressCard hotplugging
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #663433 to the same tags previously set
> th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 663269 + pending
Bug #663269 {Done: Bastian Blank } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-*: New kernels with real-time patches completely unusable
Bug #663379 {Done: Bastian Blank } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64: X will not start w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 663912 + pending
Bug #663912 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.3.0-rc6-amd64: please enable CONFIG_RTS5139 for SDcard support
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 649735 + pending
Bug #649735 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-3.0.0-2-amd64: kernel oops on removing an USB floppy drive
Bug #655625 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] kernel
NULL pointer dereference after repartitioning USB d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 655941 + pending
Bug #655941 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] [acer_wmi]
rfkill blocks wireless on thinkpad/ideapad, with no way to re-enable it
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Hi Rik,
Rik Theys wrote:
> I captured the boot via the serial console and provided the "debug"
> command line parameter to get into the initramfs prompt.
>
> It seems it's not only lvm that segfaults, but also "ls" etc in the
> initramfs.
Thanks. Are symptoms tied to the version of initramfs-to
Hi Sergey,
Sergey Platov wrote:
> ** Tainted: PIO (6145)
> * Proprietary module has been loaded.
> * Working around severe firmware bug.
> * Out-of-tree module has been loaded.
[...]
> [113170.960076] [fglrx] module unloaded - fglrx 8.95.3 [Feb 14 2012]
> [113218.218326] [drm] Initialized drm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 665000 + moreinfo
Bug #665000 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: blank screen after load
"radeon" module
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
665000: http://bugs.debian.
What happens if you uninstall fglrx, rather than letting it load and
then unloading it before loading radeon?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi,
On 03/22/2012 01:12 PM, Rik Theys wrote:
Would unpacking the initramfs on a sid box with the 3.3 kernel and
chrooting into it be able to provide any additional info? I believe the
initramfs uses another C library than glibc, or is that no longer the case?
I did this, but when I chroot into
Hi,
On 03/21/2012 05:27 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
When booting with the quiet option off, I see that the lvm command in the initrd
segfaults.
Can you get a backtrace, for example by saving a core file to some
other (virtual) disk and analyzing it afterward with gdb?
See http://wiki.debian.or
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.9-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this act
El 2012-03-21 a las 17:00 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > 2012/3/21 Camaleón :
>
> >> I'm going to keep the system all the day with wifi connected and see
> >> if I get any trace. Will report back as soon as I can provide the
> >> data. Thanks.
> >
> > I've got another t
21 matches
Mail list logo
