Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2012 01:15:11 -0600
with message-id <20120204071511.GA31134@burratino>
and subject line Re: oops when disconnecting an external hdd still mounted
has caused the Debian Bug report #637199,
regarding oops when disconnecting an external hdd still mounted
to be marked as d
Your message dated Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:58:10 -0600
with message-id <20120203235810.GA5431@burratino>
and subject line Re: b44: WARNING at kernel/softirq.c:159
_local_bh_enable_ip.isra.11+0x3d/0x88()
has caused the Debian Bug report #650495,
regarding b44: WARNING at kernel/softirq.c:159
_local_bh_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 561203 linux-2.6/3.2.2-1
Bug #561203 [linux-2.6] threads and fork on machine with VIPT-WB cache
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.2-1.
> forwarded 561203
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/4085/focus=4120
Bug #56
Sorry about the lack of response.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:14:41 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I assume you upgraded the client and not the server?
> Which was the previous version? (/var/log/dpkg.log should show this.)
>
> Did you upgrade the kernel at the same time? If so, what were the
> old
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620297 + upstream
Bug #620297 [linux-2.6] base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagree
Added tag(s) upstream.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
620297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
tags 620297 + upstream
quit
Aman Gupta wrote:
> Incorrect load average:
> 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64
> 2.6.32.55
> 2.6.32.55-620297patch
> 2.6.32.55-620297patch (nohz=off)
>
> Correct load average:
> 2.6.32.55-620297patch (CONFIG_NO_HZ=n)
>
> Since CONFIG_NO_HZ=y is default on the debian kernels, the two
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Hahn wrote:
> This alioth.debian.org was refusing connections for some time.
Ah, sorry about that. I should have mentioned that the kernel handbook
is also available from the debian-kernel-handbook package.
[...]
> Unfortunately I still get a full freeze, s. typescript.after-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620297 - patch moreinfo
Bug #620297 [linux-2.6] base: vmstat and /proc/loadavg disagree
Removed tag(s) moreinfo and patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
620297: http://bugs.debian.o
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:40:19AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > This is probably some kind of driver bug; unfortunately there's no easy
> > way to work out where it might be.
>
> Maybe ums_realtek. Could you try this patch?
>
> Instructions for testing a p
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 15:42 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > > I think you should also add family 18 (AM
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 09:45 -0200, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
[...]
> I added 'thermal' to /etc/modules and it didn't change anything. Then
> I looked at the messages and 'thermal' was already being loaded
> before.
> All I get is acpi temp, which is some kind of dummy temp because it's
> always 40°
>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
> > > http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
On 3 February 2012 00:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 18:56 -0200, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
> > Hi, linux-image was updated today from 3.2.1 to 3.2.2 in sid and broke
> > sensors for it87 chip.
> > Before the update, messages said:
> >
> >
> > Feb 2 08:09:55 debian kernel: [ 11.2
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:50:07PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2012-02-01 at 19:14 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Since 3.1 or so it is not longer possible to use this package as source
> > in terms of the GPL like the udebs have done for several releases.
> Could you be a bit more
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
The simple test program:
#include
#include
fails to compile on the Alpha arch with the following:
$ gcc -c test.c
In file included from /us
15 matches
Mail list logo