Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:37:03 +
with message-id <1326865023.2819.212.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Unable to mount Samsung SE208AB external USB DVD
burner/reader
has caused the Debian Bug report #656259,
regarding Unable to mount Samsung SE208AB external USB DVD burner/rea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 656259 2.6.32-39squeeze1
Bug #656259 [src:linux-2.6] Unable to mount Samsung SE208AB external USB DVD
burner/reader
The source linux-2.6 and version do not appear to match any binary packages
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.3
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
[...]
> > Now that I finished with building up
> [...]
> > linux-image-3.1.0-1-486_3.1.8-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb
>
> This is wrong; modules built for '3.1.0-1-486' in testing/unstable will
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
> Am 19.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> >
> > Please keep linux-2.6 up-to-date in backports [..]
> >
>
> Hello debian kernel maintainers,
> I've created a private backport of kernel 3.1.8 from testing for i386/amd64.
>
> The packages
Am 19.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
Please keep linux-2.6 up-to-date in backports [..]
Hello debian kernel maintainers,
I've created a private backport of kernel 3.1.8 from testing for i386/amd64.
The packages I considered are:
linux-image-amd64
linux-image-i386-686-pae
linux-image-i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 520622 + unreproducible
Bug #520622 [linux-2.6] Wifi does not work (AR242x)
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
520622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 656259 src:linux-2.6
Bug #656259 [linux-image] Unable to mount Samsung SE208AB external USB DVD
burner/reader
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as fo
Quoting "Jonathan Nieder" :
Perhaps there's not as much noise in the air any more. ;-)
That's the only sensible explanation :~)
I tested both linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 2.6.32-5 from
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20100201T042505Z/
(last change 2010-01-10) and linux-image-2.6.32-5
Hi,
Since there's a workaround allowing us to go kernel > 2.6.38
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2012/01/msg00013.html), I
obviously updated my Testing system to current
linux-image-3.1.0-1-mckinley_3.1.8-2_ia64.deb.
Well, graphical desktop experience is _unstable_. When I say "desktop
exper
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 655941 + upstream - moreinfo
Bug #655941 [linux-2.6] iwlagn: my wifi card doesn't works - Intel Corporation
Centrino Wireless-N 1000 [8086:0084]
Added tag(s) upstream.
Bug #655941 [linux-2.6] iwlagn: my wifi card doesn't works - Intel Corpor
tags 655941 + upstream - moreinfo
severity 655941 important
forwarded 655941
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/2856/focus=2872
retitle 655941 [acer_wmi] rfkill blocks wireless on thinkpad/ideapad, with no
way to re-enable it
quit
Andrey wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 12:23 A
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> OK, I tested, but (un)fortunately, I cannot reproduce
> the error anymore (linux-image-2.6.32-5-686, version
> 2.6.32-39squeeze1). So I didn't even try with your
> modules.
Drat. Can you reproduce it with one of the older kernels that
was troublesome before, e.g. from
Quoting "Jonathan Nieder" :
More than 12
hours later, ENOSPC.
Ouch.
ath5k.ko for 686 and 686-bigmem kernels attached.
OK, I tested, but (un)fortunately, I cannot reproduce
the error anymore (linux-image-2.6.32-5-686, version
2.6.32-39squeeze1). So I didn't even try with your
modules.
Looki
On 01/17/2012 12:23 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Andrey wrote:
2: acer-wireless: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: no
Does unloading the acer_wmi module help? How about this patch[1]?
Thanks; we seem to be closing in.
Jonathan
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.driv
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:24:08PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ben Hutchings schrieb:
> >
> > --=-GV+LLjr9UIrWlGGcGT1j
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for
>
Ben Hutchings schrieb:
>
> --=-GV+LLjr9UIrWlGGcGT1j
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for
> wheezy or wait for a later release. Whichever one we choose, we need to
> make s
Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Could it be that the BIOS overwrites my command line entry at
> shutdown time, but not at suspend time?
Sure, I can believe that. It's also possible that when you try to
enter S5, something goes wrong and the machine ends up powering
off completely and then the BIOS writes
Hi,
Michael Below wrote:
> since a few versions back (2.6.36?), the kernel quite regularly reports
> a stall on one of it's CPUs. Usually this seems to happen if the system is
> idle. When i read about the IGMP bug being fixed, I hoped this
> would solve it, but today it happened again. I am past
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#653398: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #653398,
regarding linux-2.6: Hang on resume from standby in 3.1.[56], 3.2-rc*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#655049: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #655049,
regarding Changes from longterm 2.6.32.53
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#652857: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #652857,
regarding Missing support for Intel C600 Series SAS/SATA controllers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651367: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #651367,
regarding Changes from longterm release 2.6.32.50
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651255: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #651255,
regarding ipv6: Fails to report all IPv6 addresses assigned to interface
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#650652: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #650652,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Kernel IPsec code rejects 288-bit keys
for AES-CTR as being too long
to be marke
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#650160: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #650160,
regarding Changes from longterm release 2.6.32.49
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#647624: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #647624,
regarding Changes from longterm 2.6.32.47
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#645308: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #645308,
regarding tg3 broken for NetXtreme 5714S in squeeze 6.0.3 installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638172: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #638172,
regarding BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [qemu-dm:3205]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638172: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #638172,
regarding base: Debian gets unresponsive on higher IO load - BUG: soft lockup -
CPU#0 stuck for 61s
to be marked as do
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637234: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #637234,
regarding linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen (also
affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-am
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633526: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #633526,
regarding NFS client uid/gid cache broken on VServer kernels
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586494: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41
has caused the Debian Bug report #586494,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with
2.6.26
to be marked as done.
This means th
Package: linux-image-686-pae
Version: 3.1+41
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I connected and used the webcam in question (with Skype, vlc, Jitsi)
* What exactly did you do (or not do)
Just for the record.
The dracut package has NFS v4 support. Maybe it's easier to use dracut
instead of waiting for klibc supporting it.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 10:40 +0200, Kertesz Laszlo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a webcam:
> ( 0ac8:305b ) Z-Star Microelectronics Corp. ZC0305 Webcam that uses the
> gspca driver (gspca_zc3xx). I have Debian Wheezy installed.
>
> It works well with older kernels - i used it up to 2.6.38 or 39 and h
This problem has occurred again with linux-image-3.2.0-rc7-amd64
3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1. The display was no longer updated (in
particular the mouse pointer didn't move) for several seconds.
The CPU usage suddenly became high (it is normally close to 0).
There is more than 1 GB free memory. Nothin
Hello,
I have booted with 2.6.39 from backports and was able to repair the
filesystem. (I took a snapshot of the lun first and tried the repair
on the snapshot first.)
I have attached the output of the repair.
I'm going to reply to the questions I can answer :)
- what steps you perfor
Hello,
I have a webcam:
( 0ac8:305b ) Z-Star Microelectronics Corp. ZC0305 Webcam that uses the
gspca driver (gspca_zc3xx). I have Debian Wheezy installed.
It works well with older kernels - i used it up to 2.6.38 or 39 and had
no issues with it. But with the 3 series kernels (at least the curre
Hello,
On 14/01/12 17:33, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Eric Lavarde wrote:
I'm surely not experienced in these topics, but I thought that there
should be no difference for the BIOS / ACPI between a pure shutdown
and a suspend to disk.
Nah, they are different. Suspend to disk happens with ACPI
coo
39 matches
Mail list logo
