Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 649563 + moreinfo
Bug #649563 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 can't load initial ramdisk
anymore
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
649563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
tags 649563 + moreinfo
quit
Hi Friedemann,
Friedemann Stoyan wrote:
> Loading Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 ...
> Loading initial ramdisk ...
> error: couldn't read file.
[...]
> load_video
> set gfxpayload=keep
> insmod gzio
> insmod lvm
> insmod part_msdos
>
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainers,
after upgrading wheezy to linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64, grub complains:
Loading initial ramdisk ...
error: couldn't read file.
Later the kernel panics. I have made 2 screenshots:
http://users.swapon.de/~fstoyan/public/files/3
> Is this a regression? (E.g., does the squeeze kernel behave the same way?)
No idea. If you think that's important, I'll be happy to try it out.
(I'm asking because it's a minor inconvenience, I'll need to track down
a USB drive.)
> Your best bet is probably to contact linux-a...@vger.kernel.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 649540 src:linux-2.6 3.1.1-1
Bug #649540 [linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64] ACPI failures on Dell Latitude E6220
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.1.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 649540 ACPI failures on Dell Latitude E6220
Bug #649540 [linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64] ACPI failures on Dell Latitude D6220
Changed Bug title to 'ACPI failures on Dell Latitude E6220' from 'ACPI failures
on Dell Latitude D6220'
> thanks
Stop
reassign 649540 src:linux-2.6 3.1.1-1
quit
Hi,
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> I'm trying to track down the low battery life on a Dell Latitude D6220
> with BIOS version A03. The ACPI thermal zone always indicates 25
> degrees (although both coretemp and i8k indicate reasonable values), and
> reboo
--
Congratulation from all staff of Nokia online promo.Your Internet mailing
address was automatically selected whichemerged you as a beneficiary
91,000.00GBP.Please get back to us for
details.Deadline 30th November.
Yours,
Carthy Barnes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@l
Package: linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64
Version: 3.1.1-1
I'm trying to track down the low battery life on a Dell Latitude D6220
with BIOS version A03. The ACPI thermal zone always indicates 25
degrees (although both coretemp and i8k indicate reasonable values), and
rebooting hangs without reboot=pci.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 649494 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-3
Bug #649494 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: unable to mount an hfsplus
volume
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug #649494 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: unable t
Hi,
Tianming Xie wrote:
> Version: 3.0.0-3
[...]
> I have an iPod Classic formatted with hfsplus on a Mac. It could be
> successfully mounted with the old linux-2.6.32-5 kernel. But upgraded my
> system
> from Stable(Squeeze) to Testing(Wheezy) and the kernel was also upgraded to
> linux
Sam Morris wrote:
> here's the info that appeared in syslog:
No backtrace?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2021234752.gi19...@elie.hsd1.il.comc
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
Booted computer (Samsung Q45), hibernated, booted back up, suspended,
booted back up, hibernated again, booted back up... a few minutes later
it panicked.
I took a photo of the screen, while I'll mail to the bug in a moment...
here's the info t
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 17:49:30 +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> After suspend/resume, the kernel seems to think I have 2 batteries, one empty
> and my real battery. Of course I have only one battery on this laptop (DELL
> Latitude E6400). It works fine after a reboot: acpi reports only one batter
Yea. My rough guess is that the BIOS is somehow sensitive to how the
CMOS RTC is touched.
Does disabling CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC change the behavior?
But how do I do it? :-)
I have not found a way to disable it in "menuconfig". If I comment it
out manually in .config, it is automatically set
On 22/11/2011, at 3:14 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 20:59 +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
The package linux-2,6 FTBFS on Alpha. From the log:
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 2591 modules
ERROR: "iowrite32be" [drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_en.ko] undefined!
[...]
This needs to be ad
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:27 +0100, Jiri Polach wrote:
> Finally! After another 50+ compilations a have it! It took some time as
> first I had to find a reason why some revisions did not boot (almost 2/3
> were unbootable and the first bad commit was among them). Having this
> so
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:13:02 +0100
with message-id <8739dh1e81.fsf...@nemi.mork.no>
and subject line Forget about this - was triggered by extensive IPv6 address
scanning
has caused the Debian Bug report #649486,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1 (e1000e):
diff -Nru crda-1.1.1/debian/control crda-1.1.1/debian/control
--- crda-1.1.1/debian/control 2011-04-10 17:29:00.0 -0600
+++ crda-1.1.1/debian/control 2011-11-21 10:46:25.0 -0700
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
Package: crda
Architecture: any
+Multi-Arch: foreign
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends
Prepare for multi-arch support.
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner
---
debian/control |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index c3dc7b8..9cb5645 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Homepage:
http://wirel
How does one do a simple test to see if one is on the death list?
# grep -c 86 /proc/cpuinfo
0
# lshw | grep -c 86
0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this actio
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 20:59 +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Source: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.1.1-1
> Severity: Important
> User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: alpha
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
>
> The package linux-2,6 FTBFS on Alpha. From the log:
>
> Building modules
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 19:02 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> reassign 649448 src:linux-2.6 linux-2.6/3.0.0-3
>> severity 649448 important
>> retitle 649448 radeon (evergreen): random-looking pattern of pixels when
>> firmware not installed
Finally! After another 50+ compilations a have it! It took some time as
first I had to find a reason why some revisions did not boot (almost 2/3
were unbootable and the first bad commit was among them). Having this
solved I have been able to bisect without "skipping". The result is
surprising (a
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-39
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have started to get these warnings from time to time after upgrading to a
squeeze kernel
with the backported new version of the e1000e driver:
Nov 21 12:35:51 canardo kernel: [157688.362907]
Hi Colin,
* Colin Watson [Sun Nov 20, 2011 at 05:41:09PM +]:
> It would be useful for initramfs-tools to be marked "Multi-Arch:
> foreign", to indicate that it can satisfy dependencies of packages of
> other architectures. Although Debian's dpkg doesn't yet do anything
> special with this, i
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 05:59 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please provide a kernel log covering initialisation of the btusb driver.
>
> Ben.
It's just these two lines:
Nov 21 10:35:40 durandal kernel: [73148.139130] Bluetooth: Generic Bluetooth
USB driver ver 0.6
Nov 21 10:35:40 durandal kernel:
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: Important
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
The package linux-2,6 FTBFS on Alpha. From the log:
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 2591 modules
ERROR: "iowrite32be" [drivers/net/mlx4/ml
29 matches
Mail list logo
