Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kudrevatykh wrote:
> with new kernel from testing (but only 3.0.0-1-amd64, not latest) I
> don't see any crashes, but kernel oopses.
To be clear, that means 3.0.0-4 reproduces the BUG but 3.0.0-5 does
not? If so, why would that affect anyone? :)
[...]
> smth like this o
Hi Pascal,
Pascal BERNARD wrote:
> Installing Linux 3.0 from sid with linux-base, initramfs-tools and
> linux-firmware makes my box boot.
Thanks for checking!
> Now, there is a fair distance between 2.6.38 and 3.0 + I am not an
> expert in kernel internals.
Just to check: does using linux 2.6.
Installing Linux 3.0 from sid with linux-base, initramfs-tools and
linux-firmware makes my box boot.
Now, there is a fair distance between 2.6.38 and 3.0 + I am not an
expert in kernel internals.
I am grateful for your help, but I am afraid I will not propose a patch.
Good to have apt for the de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 05:25:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 22:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I don't understand why SIGINT would be delivered to ssh rather than to
> afio.
Well, sshfs, not just ssh. afio is running under a shell script called
tob (from the package
with new kernel from testing (but only 3.0.0-1-amd64, not latest) I
don't see any crashes, but kernel oopses. I must fill new bug or can
write here?
smth like this on every ps/w/top invocation but it worked properly just
after boot, only after some time kernel started oopsing.
Oct 15 15:54:41 nul
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Uploader: Hector Oron Martinez (zumbi)
Host: leda.debian.net
Accepted: linux-2.6_3.0.0-5+armhf.1_armhf.changes
Files:
linux-image-3.0.0-2+armhf.1-mx5_3.0.0-5+armhf.1_armhf.deb
linux-headers-3.0.0-2+armhf.1-mx5_3.0.0-5+armhf.1_armhf.deb
linux-image-3.0.0-2+armhf.1-om
Hi Pascal,
Pascal BERNARD wrote:
> I forged another initramfs using one
> from a Mint distribution and replacing the modules with the one of my
> "stable" kernel.
>
> It is much more stable. It failed once. I suppose it can be with the
> normal init which has not been "upgraded".
I'm kind of con
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 11:59 +0200, Mauro wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Moritz Mühlenhoff :
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:11 +0200, Mauro wrote:
> >> > Hello, sorry for bother.
> >> > I've exactly the same problem explained in the bug but with
2011/10/14 Moritz Mühlenhoff :
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:11 +0200, Mauro wrote:
>> > Hello, sorry for bother.
>> > I've exactly the same problem explained in the bug but with xen 4.0.1
>> > distributed with squeeze.
>> > I can't do l
9 matches
Mail list logo
