Source: nfs-utils
Version: 1:1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> d
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 18:20 -0700, David Witbrodt wrote:
> I just upgraded to gcc-multilib 4.6.1-3 and found that APT
> blew away /usr/include/asm without warning. This directory
> belongs to my locally-built 'linux-libc-dev' which is produced
> using upstream kernel sources and 'make deb-pkg'.
>
linux-2.6_2.6.32-37_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-37.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-37.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-37_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-37_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-37_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.32_2.6.32-
I just upgraded to gcc-multilib 4.6.1-3 and found that APT
blew away /usr/include/asm without warning. This directory
belongs to my locally-built 'linux-libc-dev' which is produced
using upstream kernel sources and 'make deb-pkg'.
I do local builds for testing upstream kernel commits relevant
to
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-37.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-37.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:25:46, the files wil
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:43:49 -0500
with message-id <20110925003515.GA18253@elie>
and subject line Re: unable to enumerate USB device
has caused the Debian Bug report #600697,
regarding unable to enumerate USB device
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Jeff Layton wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Has this patch visited the
>> linux-nfs@, linux-cifs@, or linux-pm@ list?
>
> Not yet. I was planning to post the revised version next week after
> John tested it.
Ah, that makes sense. Sorry for the noise.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ke
Hi to all
I would like to ask a question that seems to be relevant to me:
Is there a reason for this panic in the first place ? I am experiencing
exactly the same with the all versions of Squeeze amd64 up to now on the
same M/B.
kind regards
george
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Version: 2.6.32-35squeeze2jba
Severity: normal
After adding a ssd (OCZ Vertex Plus 60GB) to my squeeze system (debian kernel
2.6.32)
I was disappointed about its performance, as it was advertised with 185 MB/s.
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 214 MB in
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 12:30 +0300, Tomi Leppänen wrote:
> With Radeon 9200SE I'm not able to use X, apparently because its memory
> can't be used.
>
> With any kernel (tried 2.6.32, 3.0.0, 3.1-rc6) I will get dmesg lines
> about overlapping.
> [0.073187] pnp 00:00: disabling [mem 0x000cd000-0x
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:58:45 -0500
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> found 642409 linux-2.6/2.6.32-35squeeze2
> found 642409 linux-2.6/3.0.0-4
> found 642409 linux-2.6/3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
> tags 642409 + upstream
> quit
>
> Hi Jeff and John,
>
> John Hughes wrote:
>
> > Well, after minor modific
With Radeon 9200SE I'm not able to use X, apparently because its memory
can't be used.
With any kernel (tried 2.6.32, 3.0.0, 3.1-rc6) I will get dmesg lines
about overlapping.
[0.073187] pnp 00:00: disabling [mem 0x000cd000-0x000c] because
it overlaps :01:00.0 BAR 0 [mem 0x-0x0
12 matches
Mail list logo
