Neither I am a programmer nor I am having much time. If it only weren't
latter, it wouldn't be fair to ask to other people to fix the problem.
Of course, I am ready to test patches (although I did only once, I hope
to be able to do it again...).
Thank you any way from your suggestion.
Whom I
Hi,
Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote:
> From your last post concerning this bug, I did not get what should
> be the procedure from now on.
I would suggest looking at the driver code, adding printk calls to
find out what it reads from the NVRAM (to confirm Ben's hypothesis),
and if it is blank, com
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # a pointer that might be a better starting point for future hackers
> # than the bug log :)
> forwarded 622842
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/68978
Bug #622842 [linux-2.6] firmware-brcm80211: not getting an associa
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 06:55 +0200, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote:
> Dear Ben and all,
>
> From your last post concerning this bug, I did not get what should be
> the procedure from now on. Should the bug be reported to another
> package ?
[...]
I passed it on to the brcm80211 developers.
B
Dear Ben and all,
From your last post concerning this bug, I did not get what should be
the procedure from now on. Should the bug be reported to another
package ? Or, is there something which is lacking that does not depend
on you or other debian maintainers (eg. firmware or non-free packag
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:43:37PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:41, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > It seems not adapted to 64 bits in fact.
> > The part that complains is in an "#ifdef __i386__", and there
> > is an alternate __x86_64__ section. It seems the section th
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:41, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:04:15PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:00, Frederic Weisbecker
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Fr
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:04:15PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:00, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:00, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Fr
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Frederic Weisbecker
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'm trying to launch this win
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:11:00PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There were two more follow on commits in stable related to this.
> I recommend merging 2.6.38.6 which includes these.
The problem still exists in the current 2.6.38.6. Backing out 5f1c356a
still solves the problem there.
I have
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
[...]
> > Do you know a kernel version that works with this test?
>
> Works on my gentoo machine, which has 2.6.37. Not sure what custom
> patches they're using though, off
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Frederic Weisbecker
>> wrote:
>> > I'm trying to launch this wine test from dlls/ntdll/tests/
>> > with ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > I'm trying to launch this wine test from dlls/ntdll/tests/
> > with ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M ntdll.dll -T ../../.. -p
> > and a git clone of the wine repo fro
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 10:21:37PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 21:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 19:50 -0500, Austin English wrote:
>> >> Package: linux-2.6
>> >> Version: 2.6.38-3
>> >> Se
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 10:21:37PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 21:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 19:50 -0500, Austin English wrote:
> >> Package: linux-2.6
> >> Version: 2.6.38-3
> >> Severity: normal
> >>
> >> This is a bug in the kernel itself, there
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7.ori
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:05:40 -0700
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:42:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This is pretty weird. Debian version 2.6.38-3 has a few bridging
> > > > changes from stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4, but they don't look like they
> > > > would cause
* rleigh [110510 23:55]:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:31:23PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> > * rleigh [110510 20:43]:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
[..]
> > >
> > > Could you retry with
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/sysvinit_2.88dsf-13.6.dsc
> >
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I recently installed a squeeze system. The generated /etc/fstab
> contains the following line:
>
>#
>proc/proc procdefaults0 0
>
> But in /usr/share/initramfs-to
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:31:23PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> * rleigh [110510 20:43]:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > >> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, sch
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:54:04PM -0300, Alejandro Carrazzoni wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.38-5
> Severity: normal
>
> I have a USB adapter (identified as Realtek RTL8187 Wireless Adapter) that I
> use to connect to wifi. Until updating the kernel from 2.6.37-2 to the current
> vers
* rleigh [110510 20:43]:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> > >>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 623631 + pending
Bug #623631 [linux-image-2.6.38-2-686] linux-image-2.6.38-2-686: aesni_intel
module missing
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping proces
I have enabled CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL=m in
debian/config/kernelarch-x86/config-arch-32 and this module was built
without errors.
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-5 (linux-image-2.6.38-2-686)
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.39_2.6.39~rc7-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-5
Severity: normal
I have a USB adapter (identified as Realtek RTL8187 Wireless Adapter) that I
use to connect to wifi. Until updating the kernel from 2.6.37-2 to the current
version, it worked perfectly, but now the connection drops randomly: sometimes
once a da
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:10:24 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> next is said to be 2.6.39, so will be directed to sid,
> most probably next week.
>
I'm hoping to be able to finish the perl transition next week, so it'd
be nice if you could hold off until that's out of the way. Otherwise we
mi
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> >>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> with initscripts 2
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:42:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > This is pretty weird. Debian version 2.6.38-3 has a few bridging
> > > changes from stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4, but they don't look like they
> > > would cause this.
> >
> > I have apparently filed the bug against the wrong ve
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:46 +0200, Leszek Urbanski wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-31
> Severity: important
>
>
> The new UFO software fallback path fails under certain conditions with NFS
> and causes partial connectivity loss due to generation of UFO packets smaller
> than the MTU
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:19:18AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:08:47AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org):
> > > I recently installed Debian stable on a Lenovo ThinkPad X220. This
> > > laptop has the following ethernet co
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: important
The new UFO software fallback path fails under certain conditions with NFS
and causes partial connectivity loss due to generation of UFO packets smaller
than the MTU, which are then discarded by the software fallback path.
This bug is pre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 594350 -moreinfo
Bug #594350 [linux-2.6] Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocate failed,
failed command: READ DMA
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
594
It's a quad-core AMD Phenom-based desktop PC.
root@testbed1:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 16
model : 4
model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 B95 Processor
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 2992.396
cache size : 512 KB
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 07:22:56PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> Version: 2.6.38-5
>
> fixed in latest upload to unstable by enabling RT2800USB_RT35XX.
> thus closing.
Recognition of this device (USB ID 1737:0079) by the rt2800usb driver
currently requires RT2800USB_UNKNOWN to be enabled.
Geo
last rc of the 2.6.39 series.
next is said to be 2.6.39, so will be directed to sid,
most probably next week.
--
maks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 21:38 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:38:44AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is pretty weird. Debian version 2.6.38-3 has a few bridging
> > changes from stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4, but they don't look like they
> > would cause this.
>
> I h
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> >>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> with initscripts 2
Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
>>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h wrote:
with initscripts 2.88dsf-13.5 from exp and initramfs-tools maks/run
there's a new warn
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> >> with initscripts 2.88dsf-13.5 from exp and initramfs-tools maks/run
> >> there's a new warning during boot:
> >> mount: can't find
Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h wrote:
>> with initscripts 2.88dsf-13.5 from exp and initramfs-tools maks/run
>> there's a new warning during boot:
>> mount: can't find /run in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab
>>
>> Apparently this is caused by mountk
on kernel 2.6.38-2-amd64 it works fine, on 2.6.32-5-amd64 it works only
with drivers from
http://www.brocade.com/services-support/drivers-downloads/CNA/Linux.page
(brocade_driver_linux_2.3.0.3.tar.gz)
on other version not working with
BFA[error] HAL_ASSERT: Assertion failure
--
To UNSUBSC
Quoting Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org):
> I don't think this is up to you. The kernel includes many backports for
> new hardware support.
OK, thanks for taking this over, Bastian.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 626220 linux-2.6
Bug #626220 [debian-installer] Did not support Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet
(needs current e1000e)
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 624794 626220
Bug#624794: Missing support f
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I have finally had time to try this. The hostap_pci module does not
work at all for my card. It detects it, and allows me to configure
it, but it does not actually send or receive any packets :(
Please can you provide some information about the hardwa
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 03:58 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:36 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 05:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:38 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
