This is very cool. It has been enabled in the experimental kernel.
Is that possible the kernel in sid (2.6.38) to be enabled, too?
Thanks.
Steven.
On 2011/5/9 上午 03:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 19:25:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#6136
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 19:25:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625510: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625510,
regarding Broadcom 802.11 driver missing from 2.6.39-rc[45]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 19:25:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#624505: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #624505,
regarding linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 19:25:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613658: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #613658,
regarding Please enable SQUASHFS_XZ et al for >=2.6.38-rc1.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
2011/5/8 Hector Oron :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>> Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug.
>> Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed
>> by Uwe Kleine-König.
>
> I have built a kernel with the following p
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6.orig.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6.ori
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.39_2.6.39~rc6-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug.
> Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed
> by Uwe Kleine-König.
I have built a kernel with the following patch and I have been able
to reproduce
there will be soon an rc7, so nothing interesting to be seen yet.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110508125343.ga23...@stro.at
Accepted:
linux-doc-2.6_2.6.38+34_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc-2.6_2.6.38+34_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.38+34_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.38+34_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.38+34_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.38-5.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.38_2.6.38-5_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.38_2.6.38-5_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.38_2.6.38-5_all.deb
to main/l/lin
Your message dated Sun, 8 May 2011 13:45:00 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#626031: debian-kernel-handbook: please support U-Boot
format images.
has caused the Debian Bug report #626031,
regarding debian-kernel-handbook: please support U-Boot format images.
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 12:37:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#624505: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.38-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #624505,
regarding linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 12:37:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#623808: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.38-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #623808,
regarding Please activate RT33XX options
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sun, 08 May 2011 12:37:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#599121: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.38-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #599121,
regarding linux-2.6: [m68k] nfeth driver vanished? no network connectivity!
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Hi,
2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-05-08 12:19]:
>> Machine ID stuff cannot go in kernel package.
> Right. And that's the reason why I don't understand why you'd want to
> put an uImage into the kernel package. We just need to take the
> uImage apart again, add the machine I
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Severity: important
Hi!
I try to copy / move file to a smb share using nautilus. I got an kernel
oops
Here the dmesg output after resuming the box
[ 963.340370] EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts:
errors=remount-ro,commit=120,commit=0
[ 963.344790] EXT4-fs (sda5)
* Hector Oron [2011-05-08 12:19]:
> Machine ID stuff cannot go in kernel package.
Right. And that's the reason why I don't understand why you'd want to
put an uImage into the kernel package. We just need to take the
uImage apart again, add the machine ID and generate an uImage again.
Can you d
Hi,
2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-05-08 11:27]:
>> I think machine_ID and kernel_format (uImage|vmlinuz|vmlinux) could
>> easily be fields in the architecture config files (defines).
> How does this help? We ship one kernel image for a platform and this
> will run on several
* Hector Oron [2011-05-08 11:27]:
> I think machine_ID and kernel_format (uImage|vmlinuz|vmlinux) could
> easily be fields in the architecture config files (defines).
How does this help? We ship one kernel image for a platform and this
will run on several machines (which have their own machine I
Hi,
2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-05-08 08:10]:
>> Adding support for U-Boot image format ('uImage' kernel target) in
>> official kernel packages seem to me the right thing to do, it would
> This was suggested before but there are some reasons why I don't
> believe it wil
* Hector Oron [2011-05-08 08:10]:
> Adding support for U-Boot image format ('uImage' kernel target) in
> official kernel packages seem to me the right thing to do, it would
This was suggested before but there are some reasons why I don't
believe it will work:
- We need to hardcode the machi
Dear sir,
i just wanted to ask if the bug is resolved already. Booting into kernel
2.6.38 also brings the system to halt when more then one
CPU core is activated. The system boots fine when only one CPU core (of
four) is activated.
Sincerely,
Adrian Kiess
--
Adrian Immanuel Kieß (adrian at imm
24 matches
Mail list logo
