Processed: Re: linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some, circumstances

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 617364 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #617364 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some, circumstances Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream. > fixed 617364 linux-2.6/2.6.38~rc6-1~experimental

Bug#617364: linux-2.6: lseek() over NFS is returning an incorrect file length under some, circumstances

2011-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 617364 + upstream fixed-upstream fixed 617364 linux-2.6/2.6.38~rc6-1~experimental.1 quit Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > The upstream fix is commit 27dc1cd3ad9300f81e1219e5fc305d91d85353f8 > (NFS: nfs_wcc_update_inode() should set nfsi->attr_gencount). Quick update: it's part of 2.6.35.13 now and th

Processed: Re: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 593683 + moreinfo Bug #593683 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders Added tag(s) moreinfo. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593683: http://bugs

Bug#593683: linux-2.6 - images does not conflict with pre-policy versions of bootloaders

2011-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 593683 + moreinfo quit Bastian Blank wrote: > unarchive 593683 > found 593683 2.6.32-29 > thanks Ping. I generally trust your judgement, so I'll just ask: - which bootloaders is the package missing Breaks for? - have you tested the upgrade path, or would you like help testing the upg

Processed: tagging 624505

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 624505 + pending Bug #624505 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: bug 622842 is forwarded to linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 622842 linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org Bug #622842 [linux-2.6] firmware-brcm80211: not getting an associated point Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#622842: brcm80211 not setting correct country code?

2011-04-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: [...] > [ 330.205983] brcm80211: module is from the staging directory, the quality > is unknown, you have been warned. > [ 330.212186] brcm80211 :03:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> > IRQ 17 > [ 330.212195] brcm80211 :03:00.0: setting latency ti

Processed: tagging 623808

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 623808 + pending Bug #623808 [linux-2.6] Please activate RT33XX options Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Processed: tagging 618485

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 618485 + pending Bug #618485 {Done: dann frazier } [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-686: VM value in /proc/virtual/xxx/limit decreases abnormally Added tag

Bug#624605: Potential fixes for lenny from stable 2.6.27.59

2011-04-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 05:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > 137/173 char/tpm: Fix unitialized usage of data buffer > > Not important enough. [...] Actually, this is an information leak. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.a

Processed: found 618485 in 2.6.26-26lenny2

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # by inspection > found 618485 2.6.26-26lenny2 Bug #618485 {Done: dann frazier } [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-686: VM value in /proc/virtual/xxx/limit decreases abnormally There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at versio

Bug#624605: Potential fixes for lenny from stable 2.6.27.59

2011-04-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-26lenny2 Severity: normal We might as well get some benefit from these backports: 001/173 USB: EHCI: ASPM quirk of ISOC on AMD SB800 002/173 rt2x00: add device id for windy31 usb device 003/173 hwmon: (via686a) Initialize fan_div values 004/173 USB: usb-storage:

Processed: Re: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 622993 Bug#622993: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..." Bug#624486: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35) Bug#62454

Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
unmerge 622993 forwarded 622993 dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org quit Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > The patch works perfectly, so at least I have a workaround :-) Thank you! > > Now the question is why the DVI port gets a corrupt EDID while the VGA port > gets it right. Or maybe th

Bug#624549: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Vie 29 Abr 2011 22:08:09 Jonathan Nieder escribió: [snip] > Thanks. Could you try the patch from > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27708#c7 > > and see what happens when booting with the drm.edid_strict=0 option? The patch works perfectly, so at least I have a workaround :-)

Bug#623808: Please activate RT33XX options

2011-04-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
- Original message - > > CONFIG_RT2800PCI_RT33XX > > CONFIG_RT2800PCI_RT35XX > > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT33XX > > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX > > These options currently carry the disclaimer: > > | Support for these devices is non-functional at the moment and is > | intended for testers and devel

Bug#624549: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Vie 29 Abr 2011 22:19:41 Jonathan Nieder escribió: [snip] > A recompile is the only way I know, I'm afraid (but I'd be happy if > others can correct me). > > The good news is that nowadays the kernel provides a "make deb-pkg" > rule that does not require running "make clean" between compiles.

Bug#624549: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Vie 29 Abr 2011 22:08:09 Jonathan Nieder escribió: >> Thanks. Could you try the patch from >> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27708#c7 >> >> and see what happens when booting with the drm.edid_strict=0 option? > > Sure! Just out of

Bug#624549: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Vie 29 Abr 2011 22:08:09 Jonathan Nieder escribió: > forcemerge 624549 624486 622993 > quit > > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > With a dual screen setup. Not so long ago (less than a week) both > > monitors (ViewSonic VG2021wm) were working fine. Somehow the monitor > > connected

Processed: Re: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 624549 624486 622993 Bug#624549: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35) Bug#622993: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is inval

Bug#624549: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

2011-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
forcemerge 624549 624486 622993 quit Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > With a dual screen setup. Not so long ago (less than a week) both monitors > (ViewSonic VG2021wm) were working fine. Somehow the monitor connected to the > DVI port started not being detected correctly on boot (wr

Bug#622993: I can confirm this bug

2011-04-29 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi!I have a 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Manhattan HDMI Audio [Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series] With a dual screen setup. Not so long ago (less than a week) both monitors (ViewSonic VG2021wm) were working fine. Somehow the monitor connected to the DVI port started not being detec

Bug#519158: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: ATA subsystem crashes and renders single drive unusable)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:26:33 +0200 with message-id <20110429232633.GA6566@pisco.westfalen.local> and subject line Re: Still problems with already changed hardware has caused the Debian Bug report #519158, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: ATA subsystem crashes and renders single

Bug#510108: marked as done (Suspend failure on Apple PowerBook G4)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:23:38 +0200 with message-id <20110429232338.GA5960@pisco.westfalen.local> and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-powerpc: suspend no longer works (when lid closed) - freeze has caused the Debian Bug report #510108, regarding Suspend failure on Apple PowerB

Bug#512779: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: XFS internal error / xfs_force_shutdown

2011-04-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:48:45PM +0100, Bastian Scholz wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 > Version: 2.6.26-12 > Severity: important > > > In the last three month I had around five crashes with my XFS filesystem > > # dmesg > > [7688274.093948] Filesystem "dm-2": XFS internal error

Processed: tagging 623808

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 623808 - sid Bug #623808 [linux-2.6] Please activate RT33XX options Removed tag(s) sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 623808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623808 Debian B

Bug#617508: patch available

2011-04-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Rik Theys wrote: > On 04/15/2011 05:49 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >>Please consider adding this patch to a ((old)stable) kernel update. > > > >I don't think this is sufficiently critical for an oldstable update. > >For stable, yes, we'll consider it once it's accepted upstream. Please > >let us k

Processed: Re: Please activate RT33XX options

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 623808 moreinfo Bug #623808 [linux-2.6] Please activate RT33XX options Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 623808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623808 De

Bug#623808: Please activate RT33XX options

2011-04-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
tags 623808 moreinfo thanks On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 03:35:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.38-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: sid > > Hi, > > As there was not follow-up on my email to the list, I'm sending this > bug report, in the hope that it will bring atte

Bug#593421: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: fails to show anything on the LCD display with an Intel video card)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:45:10 +0200 with message-id <20110429224509.GA3535@pisco.westfalen.local> and subject line Re: Bug#593421: Bug not found in version 2.6.32-19 has caused the Debian Bug report #593421, regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: fails to show anything on the LCD disp

Bug#581525: marked as done (rt2860: rt2860 doesn't connect to WPA2 networks)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:45:56 +0200 with message-id <20110429224555.GA3757@pisco.westfalen.local> and subject line Re: rt2860: rt2860 doesn't connect to WPA2 networks has caused the Debian Bug report #581525, regarding rt2860: rt2860 doesn't connect to WPA2 networks to be marked as d

Bug#623308: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: Lenovo X200 laptop fails to power down under 2.6.38

2011-04-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:01:37PM +1000, Jason White wrote: > Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:29:13AM +1000, Jason White wrote: > > > Laptop-mode appears to be the cause; can you reproduce the bug by > > > enabling it > > > on your X200? > > > > How did you activate the

Processed: Re: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 624549 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1126934 Bug #624549 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lin

Bug#624549: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
forwarded 624549 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1126934 quit Hi, Martin Teufel wrote: > radeon :01:05.0: HDMI-A-1: EDID block 0 invalid. > [drm:radeon_dvi_detect] *ERROR* HDMI-A-1: probed a monitor but no|invalid EDID > > This error message is spamming to tty1 (and because of my

linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2011-04-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5.orig.tar.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2

Bug#624372: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.39: Fix warnings for invalid symbol values (now boolean))

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:50:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#624372: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #624372, regarding linux-source-2.6.39: Fix warnings for invalid symbol values (now boolean) to be marked as done. This

Bug#624135: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-amd64: Moduls for intel wlan legacy missing)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:50:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#624124: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #624124, regarding linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-amd64: Moduls for intel wlan legacy missing to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#624124: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-amd64: no longer includes driver for iwl3945)

2011-04-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:50:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#624124: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #624124, regarding linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-amd64: no longer includes driver for iwl3945 to be marked as done. This means t

linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1_multi.changes is NEW

2011-04-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5.orig.tar.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5.ori

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1_multi.changes

2011-04-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5.orig.tar.gz linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz linux-patch-debian-2.6.39_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1_all.de

Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

2011-04-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: linux-2.6_2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:25:25, the files will be deleted

Bug#613634: The fix works

2011-04-29 Thread Romain LE DISEZ
I built the package linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 with the patch attached to this mail (which is a slightly modified version of the patch mentionned on xen-devel@). It works fine. My test was to run this command: while [ 1 ]; do lvcreate -n test -L 1G nsia.st2xnX lvremove -f

Bug#622842: firmware-brcm80211: not getting an associated point

2011-04-29 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
In Spain (PC - City company). It is a Dell Inspiron M101z (service tag CHL0SM1) . BTW, in Windows 7, it worked perfectly. But I removed it installing Debian Wheezy. Best and thanks, Wenceslao Ben Hutchings ha escrito: On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:48 +0200, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote:

Bug#622842: firmware-brcm80211: not getting an associated point

2011-04-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:48 +0200, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Dear all, > > After installing CRDA I am not able to have regulatory domain = EU in > brcm80211 .Consequently, I cannot connect to any 2.472 GHz wifi. The > dmesg log is the following (from just before "modprobe brcm80211" in

Bug#622842: firmware-brcm80211: not getting an associated point

2011-04-29 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Dear all, After installing CRDA I am not able to have regulatory domain = EU in brcm80211 .Consequently, I cannot connect to any 2.472 GHz wifi. The dmesg log is the following (from just before "modprobe brcm80211" in a way that you can see the good regulatory domain for cfg80211 !!!; see

Bug#624549: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bug in radeon driver module of linux 2.6.38 (since 2.6.35)

2011-04-29 Thread Martin Teufel
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-3 Severity: important Tags: upstream Hi, I encountered a bug in the radeon driver module of 2.6.37 which still exists in 2.6.38. I have a mainboard called M2A-VM which has VGA, DVI and display port as graphic output ports. When I boot Debian GNU/Linux with Lin

Bug#624505: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled

2011-04-29 Thread bartek szurgot
On 04/29/2011 03:45 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 03:18:57PM +0200, bartek szurgot wrote: >> >> i bought device (i.e. usb frame grabber) that works with this driver. > > how about telling that in the *first* request. (: user Oops... ;) >> since it is kernel part any way

Bug#624505: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled

2011-04-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 03:18:57PM +0200, bartek szurgot wrote: > > i bought device (i.e. usb frame grabber) that works with this driver. how about telling that in the *first* request. (: > for now i have manually-compiled module for this that works fine, but in > a long term i'd prefer to have

Bug#624505: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled

2011-04-29 Thread bartek szurgot
On 04/29/2011 01:01 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:10:11AM +0200, bartek szurgot wrote: >> Package: linux-2.6 >> Version: 2.6.38-3 >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: upstream >> >> please include easycap.ko (staging) driver as a module in kernel. > > why do you need it or fo

Bug#624505: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: easycap.ko module not enabled

2011-04-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:10:11AM +0200, bartek szurgot wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.38-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: upstream > > please include easycap.ko (staging) driver as a module in kernel. why do you need it or for what it may help you, might help to weight your request.

Re: [PATCH base-installer] Update i386 kernel selection for new flavours in wheezy

2011-04-29 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 05:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:38 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 15:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The '686-bigmem' flavour will be renamed to '686-pae'; support both names. > > > The '686' flavour will be removed, but

Bug#623308: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: Lenovo X200 laptop fails to power down under 2.6.38

2011-04-29 Thread Jason White
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:29:13AM +1000, Jason White wrote: > > Laptop-mode appears to be the cause; can you reproduce the bug by enabling > > it > > on your X200? > > How did you activate the laptop mode on your system? > > If I install laptop-mode-tools, the system