Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The igb driver up to 2.6.34 uses an incorrect check to detect the presence
of a management card sharing the network interface.
This can lead to a loss of network connectivity for the host and/or the
management card eventua
Continuing Ben's work, I fixed all remaining issues.
Patch was uploaded to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31962
Everything works fine for me now.
regards
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Continuing Ben's work, I fixed all remaining issues.
Patch was uploaded to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31962
Everything works fine for me now.
regards
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:30:23PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Debian Bug Tracking System [110331 03:39 +]:
> > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > >
> > > > reassign 617743 alsa-driver
> > > Bug #61
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 00:04 -0400, Matt wrote:
> fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64_none_amd64 works,
> fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64_xen_amd64 does not
> no such targets in rules.gen.
>
> Sources are up-to-date (apt-get install linux-source-2.6.32-5-xen-amd6
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64_none_amd64 works,
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64_xen_amd64 does not
no such targets in rules.gen.
Sources are up-to-date (apt-get install linux-source-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64)
and process from
'http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian
As you may be aware, the kernel team has been gradually simplifying the
maintainer scripts of kernel image packages and removing features that
are redundant with hooks. (Note that packages built with make-kpkg or
the upstream 'deb-pkg' target already lack these features.)
One of those features re
Accepted:
linux-base_3.2.dsc
to main/l/linux-base/linux-base_3.2.dsc
linux-base_3.2.tar.gz
to main/l/linux-base/linux-base_3.2.tar.gz
linux-base_3.2_all.deb
to main/l/linux-base/linux-base_3.2_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
linux-base_3.2.dsc - source kernel
linux-base_3.2_al
linux-base_3.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-base_3.2.dsc
linux-base_3.2.tar.gz
linux-base_3.2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.deb
Hi,
I have same problem. And this may be known.
2.6.38.2 breaks suspend to disk
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/30/372
Possible kernel panic after resume from s2disk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--
Regards,
dai
GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D
We've fixed the powerpc FTBFS, an XFS regression and a few other
issues, so I'll plan to upload -33 tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:53 +0530, mahith...@dell.com wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> We just wanted to confirm if , Debian 6 works fine with PERC H 700
> controller cards.
>
> Kindly provide us the info .
I believe these use the MegaSAS 9260 controller, supported by the
megaraid_sas driver. They s
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 17:02 -0700, Dragan Tadic wrote:
> There all,
> Whats happen when i try to install linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64. Result of
> installation is:
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> (Reading database ... 357945 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace linux-i
There all,
Whats happen when i try to install linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64. Result of
installation is:
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 357945 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64 2.6.38-2 (using
.../linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620299 - squeeze
Bug #620299 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: nfs stop working after some
time - rpc.mountd and rpciod in D state
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
reassign 620287 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
thanks
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 21:38 +0200, Martin Hettich wrote:
> Package: xfce4-power-manager
> Version: 0.8.5-2
> Severity: normal
>
> While pressing sleep button (Fn-F4 in this case), there occured a kernel oops:
>
> [106407.439532] BUG: unable to hand
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 620287 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Bug #620287 [xfce4-power-manager] xfce4-power-manager: Kernel Oops / NULL
pointer deref. while pressing sleep button (Fn-F4 in this case)
Bug reassigned from package 'xfce4-power-manager' to 'linux-image-2
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
Hi,
I've got a strange behavior with my nfs server since I use nfsv4.
I'm using nfsv3 and nfsv4 with libpam-ldap, libnss-ldap, and unscd.
The server, after some times (it can be few days or some weeks), stop
respondi
Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:42:41 -0300
> "Emiliano M. Rudenick" wrote:
>
>>> We don't have a free kernel in the archive yet, but you could
>>> easily install linux-libre of your own accord.
>>> thanks,
>>> kk
>
>> The kernel that comes default in Debian Squeeze is completely fre
Am Donnerstag 31 März 2011, 21:04:05 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.38-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > there are several problems with this linux-image, either the
> > configuration or pa
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 18:26, Amaya wrote:
> Switching from portmap to rpcbind seemed to help (for me).
> Hope this helps.
>
I can confirm this. Problem disappeared when switching to rpcbind.
--
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
GPG Key = 127029F1
http://muammar.me | http://proyectocienci
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-2
Severity: important
Start my box after hibernate it.
I see a blinking cursor at the top left side. After a few second I see
only "_". No blinking. Nothing else.
Using linux-image-2.6.38-1 it works
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.38
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:47:52PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.38-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> there are several problems with this linux-image, either the configuration or
> patches as a self-compile 2.6.38-rc7 does not suffer from those problems.
> The
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:30:23PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Debian Bug Tracking System [110331 03:39 +]:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> > > reassign 617743 alsa-driver
> > Bug #617743 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-2-686: found another USB midi
> > cabl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 620216 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32342
Bug #620216 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-1-686: kernel hangs with XFS
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32342'.
> thanks
Stopping proc
* Debian Bug Tracking System [110331 03:39 +]:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 617743 alsa-driver
> Bug #617743 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-2-686: found another USB midi
> cable with a 4 byte limit
> Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'alsa-driver'
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
there are several problems with this linux-image, either the configuration or
patches as a self-compile 2.6.38-rc7 does not suffer from those problems.
The boot process (until login on vt1 is possible) take >6 minutes with the
Debian kerne
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #596801 (http://bugs.debian.org/596801)
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
Switching from portmap to rpcbind seemed to help (for me).
Hope this helps.
--
.''`. Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself
: :' : -- The life of David Gale
`. `'
`-Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to the list ]
>
> [QUOTE]
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next20110331.dileks1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
> This version splits into "2.6.39~rc1" and "
2.6.32-30 -> 2.6.32-31
On 26 March 2011 16:54, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:17 +, Mark King wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-31
> > Severity: important
> >
> > On boot, thermal trip points are set to the following:
> > cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/TZ1/trip_
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 21:19 -0400, Simon L'nu wrote:
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.38-1-686
>> Version: 2.6.38-1-686
>> Severity: important
>> File: linux-image-2.6.38-1-686
>> Tags: sid
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> it's not installed right now, since it d
(dropping owner@)
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:16 +0200, Frank Scherrer wrote:
> > Sorry, but i don't get this.
> >
> > There was a testing release of squeeze, which did boot on XenServer
> > 5.6.0 but the now stable Version of squeeze doesn'
Kernel bug number is 32342
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32342
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d9485b2.3010...@gmail.com
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:16 +0200, Frank Scherrer wrote:
> Sorry, but i don't get this.
>
> There was a testing release of squeeze, which did boot on XenServer
> 5.6.0 but the now stable Version of squeeze doesn't.
In #607885 I don't see any claim that a beta or release candidate of the
installe
Sorry, but i don't get this.
There was a testing release of squeeze, which did boot on XenServer
5.6.0 but the now stable Version of squeeze doesn't.
And now the bug is closed?
I am curious because updating to XenServer 5.6.1 is not an option for
me, as drbd does not work out-of-the-box on 5.
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to the list ]
[QUOTE]
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next20110331.dileks1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
This version splits into "2.6.39~rc1" and "1~next20110331.dileks1".
> $ head -2 debian/config/defines
> [a
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:26 +0200, Pallai Roland wrote:
> 2011/3/31 Ben Hutchings :
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 19:28 +0200, Roland Pallai wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Before the building I applied the lightweight
> >> "forward_shared-2.6.37-2.diff"
> >> patch from Julian Anastasov (and I bumped the versio
2011/3/31 Ben Hutchings :
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 19:28 +0200, Roland Pallai wrote:
> [...]
>> Before the building I applied the lightweight "forward_shared-2.6.37-2.diff"
>> patch from Julian Anastasov (and I bumped the version to -1.1~magex).
>> forward_shared is enabled (by default) on all inter
Sorry,
I forgot to mention that we are running debian squeeze (stable) on a
freshly installed system. So the bug seems to still be there in the
stable kernel, and not just in the backported one.
Giuseppe
--
Giuseppe Lavagetto, Ph.d.
Systems Manager and Developer - Gruppo Immobiliare.it s.r.l.
Hi, posting here since I am evidently reproducing this bug.
Under load (relatively mild anyway) a 24-core X5660, 24GB RAM Dell
Poweredge 710 gets stuck with 100% cpu usage (meaning one core gets
stuck in running kswapd). The peculiarity of the situation is that NO
swap is being allocated, si and s
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next20110331.dileks1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
This version splits into "2.6.39~rc1" and "1~next20110331.dileks1".
> $ head -2 debian/config/defines
> [abi]
> abiname: next20110331-1
>
> If I remove "~rc1" mean
Hi,
I am using a slightly modified version of the kernel-buildsystem from
trunk which you offer to build my linux-next kernels.
Unfortunately, even I use UNRELEASED as Distribution my $ABINAME is
not accepted, I have these setttings:
$ head -1 debian/changelog
linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next2011033
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:25:05AM +0200, Thomas Prokosch wrote:
> Since the big XFS refacturing, kernels tend to hang on one particular
> machine. It is not a hardware problem, since the very same machine works
> flawlessly with the very same configuration, by just using an older
> (<=2.6.26) k
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-1
Severity: important
Since the big XFS refacturing, kernels tend to hang on one particular machine.
It is not a hardware problem, since the very same machine works flawlessly with
the very same configuration, by just using an older (<=2.6.26) kernel.
Especial
46 matches
Mail list logo
