"
What does 'not supported' mean? Do any of the keys work?
Ben."
-no, all keys absolutely not working, but led's does light.
zitev.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: htt
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:32:47 -0800 (PST)
> As far as GCC can see, the object is static and also not part of an
> array or any other C construct for which things like this could matter
> as long as the alignment it chooses meets the minimum alignment
> requirements of the ABI
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:08:45 -0500
> - No aligned() type attribute nor variable attribute. I get a crash on x86_64
> (NULL pointer exception when executing __trace_add_event_call, the 5th
> call).
> __alignof__(struct ftrace_event_call) is worth 8.
I think I figur
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 610498 firmware-linux-nonfree
Bug #610498 [installation-reports] installation-reports: D510MO-mainboard -
where to find missing rtl81168d-1.fw?
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'firmware-linux-nonfree'.
> thanks
Stop
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:08:45 -0500
> The following works fine for me now. Comments are welcome.
Thanks for doing this work Mathieu.
> - No aligned() type attribute nor variable attribute. I get a crash on x86_64
> (NULL pointer exception when executing __trace_add_e
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:13 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > > On
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:00:27 -0800 (PST)
> I'll look into fixing binutils so that it properly reports the
> correct R_SPARC_OLO10 relocation in dumps. There really is no
> excuse for what it's currently doing. In fact, I think this
> quirk has sent me on wild goose chases
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:11 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Ben - Is there any reason I shouldn't carry this patch for Natty? Its
> been requested by at least one upstream developer.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607411
Since Clint has now applied it to debianutils in Debian (
What does 'not supported' mean? Do any of the keys work?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
When I work on the framebuffer text console on my UltraSPARC 10 with an
13W3 monitor as primary screen, the console blanks after approximately
10 or 15 minutes even if I'm typing on that console at that moment.
Switching back to X with Alt
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This is strange, and is similar to bug #538410. After a random time of
usage, ethernet stops working.
This should have been fixed starting from kernel 2.6.33-rc4.
I've compiled 2.6.36.2 (from ker
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 610467 linux-2.6
Bug #610467 [firmware-linux-free] firmware-linux-free: not supported hardware:
Gigabyte K8100 Aivia USB Gaming Keyboard
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-linux-free' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in v
From: Richard Mortimer
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:23:14 +
> To close this off as a non-issue as far as my boot failures are
> concerned I did some further checking and objdump is displaying
> R_SPARC_OLO10 as two separate entries. I checked the scsi_mod.ko binary
> and found the appropriate El
Package: firmware-linux-free
Version: 2.6.32-30
Severity: important
lsusb
Bus 002 Device 006: ID 060b:2270 Solid Year
Bus 002 Device 005: ID 1044:7a02 Chu Yuen Enterprise Co., Ltd
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 045e:0040 Microsoft Corp. Wheel Mouse Optical
Bus 002 Device 003: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, I
* steff [Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 09:22:20PM +0100]:
> ~ $ update-initramfs -u
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
> update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
What does 'sh -x /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs -o /tmp/foo' display?
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Descri
Ben - Is there any reason I shouldn't carry this patch for Natty? Its
been requested by at least one upstream developer.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607411
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:22:20PM +0100, steff wrote:
> Sorry.
>
> ~ $ update-initramfs -u
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
> update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
>
hmmm not seen that in a long time.
please post output of:
mkinitramfs -o /tmp
Sorry.
~ $ update-initramfs -u
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:15 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> tags 610462 moreinfo
> stop
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11:43PM +0100, steff wrote
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:13 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:46 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 610462 moreinfo
Bug #610462 [initramfs-tools] update-initramfs: failed for
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 (errorcode 127)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610462: http://bu
tags 610462 moreinfo
stop
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11:43PM +0100, steff wrote:
>
> The error I'm encountering looks like bug 600453, although I
> have a "normal" root and boot partition, and that was closed for
> version 0.98.5. I include the relevant
> sections of $(mount) and /etc/fstab below
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:46 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > > > Also align TRACE_PRINTKS on 8 bytes to make sure the b
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.7
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
The error I'm encountering looks like bug 600453, although I
have a "normal" root and boot partition, and that was closed for
version 0.98.5. I include the relevant
sections of $(mount) and /etc/fstab below. I seem to have
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:38:41PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:55:26PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
[...]
> > BTW, here is a bugreport I got privately about
> > the very same issue:
> > On 12.1.2011 10:02, Ralf Rösch wrote:
> > | [...]
> > | Attached you will find a p
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:16 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:46 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > > Also align TRACE_PRINTKS on 8 bytes to make sure the beginning of the
> > > section is
> > > aligned on point
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:46 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Also align TRACE_PRINTKS on 8 bytes to make sure the beginning of the
> > section is
> > aligned on pointer size.
>
> If I can make it crash without the alignments and this
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:46 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * David Miller (da...@davemloft.net) wrote:
> > From: David Miller
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:00:39 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > > ftrace: Remove unnecessary alignment tag from ftrace_event_call.
> > >
> > > It's completely unnecessary and
On mar., 2011-01-04 at 12:25 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I've put updated patches on
> http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/kernel-grsec/patches/ (kernel is
> built but not uploaded to packages/ since it's quite huge, will do that
> at one point. Patches are attached to that mail too.
>
>
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 22:35 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:15:41 -0500
>
> > Again, this is to help the linker keep arrays in tacked. Tracepoints are
> > allocated into the tracepoint section, and then read like an array. If
> > the linker adds holes
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 22:27 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that the align directive is there purposely to
> down-align the structure so that the amount of space that tracing
> information consumes is minimized.
>
> I honestly can't tell, only Steven Rostedt can tell us for su
* David Miller (da...@davemloft.net) wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:00:39 -0800 (PST)
>
> > ftrace: Remove unnecessary alignment tag from ftrace_event_call.
> >
> > It's completely unnecessary and causes problems on platforms
> > where this tag down-aligns the structure'
Hi Jacco,
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 17:06 +0100, Jacco Beije wrote:
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta2-amd64-netinst.iso
[...]
>
> After selecting which install (tried normal and expert) the kernel boots but
> hangs right away,
Szanowni Państwo,
W związku z ustawą z dnia 18 lipca 2002 roku o świadczeniu usług drogą
elektroniczną (dz.U.nr144 z 9 września 2002 r.,poz1204), prosimy o wyrażenie
zgody na przesłanie drogą elektroniczną oferty dotyczącej:
DYSTRYBUCJI KRAJOWYCH I ZAGRANICZNYCH PRZESYŁEK KURIERSKICH
Polsk
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:52 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2011 06:50, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >> So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the
> >> final module object.
> >>
> >> Therefor
On 18/01/2011 06:50, David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST)
So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the
final module object.
Therefore, we really should handle R_SPARC_13 in the sparc module loader.
Ok, I now feel like I
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:24:44AM +0100, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Bernhard R. Link"
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:39:54 +0100
>
> > * David Miller [110117 07:07]:
> >> Ugh, and I just noticed that include/linux/klist.h does this fixed
> >> alignment of "4" too, where is this stuff coming from
36 matches
Mail list logo
