Hi,
Can someone explain to me what is a trunk kernel? Are they safe to
install? I would like to have the newly added 2.6.37 kernel in
experimental in my Squeeze box. Is that a wise thing to do? Are there
any risks involved?
Thanks.
Nima
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ..
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 22:03 +0100, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc
> Version: 2.6.32-29
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The Lenny PPC kernel image packages included the device tree sources,
> which are normally found in arch/powerpc/boot/dts in the Linux sources.
> This isn
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 22:58 +0100, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some months ago I asked on this mailing list how to create all the
> kernel config fragments so that they can be used by the Debian kernel
> build scripts to rebuild the final .config file.
>
> I was pointed to this tool here:
>
Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:55:12 +
with message-id <1294365312.3044.21.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#598715: linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-686-bigmem: Belkin WLAN
adapter stopped working due to removal of Ralink staging drivers
has caused the Debian Bug report #598715,
regardi
Hi,
Some months ago I asked on this mailing list how to create all the
kernel config fragments so that they can be used by the Debian kernel
build scripts to rebuild the final .config file.
I was pointed to this tool here:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/people/waldi/utils/kconfigeditor2/
I hope
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc
Version: 2.6.32-29
Severity: wishlist
The Lenny PPC kernel image packages included the device tree sources,
which are normally found in arch/powerpc/boot/dts in the Linux sources.
This isn't the case anymore for the Squeeze kernel packages. It looks
like this
yellow writes:
> Package: nfs-kernel-server
> Version: 1:1.2.2-4
> Severity: normal
>
> For the clients to mount their /home, I need to do :
Jikes, that sounds scary. How often do you need to restart it? Can
you make it happen more often if you mount/remount in a loop?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
>
> > [03/49] fuse: verify ioctl retries
> > Kernel buffer overflow, but only CUSE servers could exploit it and
> > /dev/cuse is normally restricted to root.
>
> Upstream fix:
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/7572777eef78ebdee1ecb7c258c0ef94d35bad16
> Introduced in 2.6.29.
Please use CVE-2010-4650
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
For the clients to mount their /home, I need to do :
/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server restart
exports:
/home 192.168.1.0/24(rw,root_squash)
regards
No kerberos is present, nor nothing even
-- System Information:
Debian Release: s
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:05:47AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> These are the patches that looked security-relevant, from a fairly quick
> review:
Thanks for the review Ben! Steve, can you assign CVEs for the
following issues?
> [03/49] fuse: verify ioctl retries
> Kernel buffer overflow, but on
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.37-1~experimental.1_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.37-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.dsc
to main/l/linu
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#608185: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #608185,
regarding btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#608138: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #608138,
regarding Annoying warning "NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu0"
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#596390: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596390,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607863: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607863,
regarding linux-base postinst fails to update UUIDs in /boot/boot/grub
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Hi all,
attached is a patch to fix this sparc boot issue.
commit 25edd6946a1d74e5e77813c2324a0908c68bcf9e
from upstream introduced the "regression" by effectively unveiling other
bugs around the code that handles access to the sparc PROM.
this commit made it into stable and it is present in
deb
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 02:55:25 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The correct driver is 'intel' I don't how why you ended up with 'i810',
> but in any case that would be a bug in xdebconfigurator, not the kernel.
> Possibly 'i810' just works as an alias for 'intel'.
>
Yes, i810 is the old name for
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:17 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
> Ian,
>
> On 01/06/2011 10:09 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> I can test some more options on this system for a few more days, but
> >> then I have to reinstall it.
> >
> > If you are able it would be useful to know if the tip of
> > xen-4.0-testin
Ian,
On 01/06/2011 10:09 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I can test some more options on this system for a few more days, but
then I have to reinstall it.
If you are able it would be useful to know if the tip of
xen-4.0-testing.hg (which is just about to become 4.0.2-rc1) works or
not. You would only
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 10:01 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried the following combinations:
[...]
Thanks, I'll dig through the logs in a bit and see if anything shows up.
> This looks like a bug in the Xen hypervisor and not a kernel parameter?
I think so, the CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEM
20 matches
Mail list logo
