Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.7
Severity: normal
Installing initramfs-tools version 0.98.7 on squeeze (=debian testing) I get
the following error messages:
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 296:
/tmp/mkinitramfs_6qmV4K/scripts/init-top/all_generic_ide: Permission denied
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 29
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package firmware-nonfree. This includes several
important fixes for network hardware:
- Added firmware patches for some Realtek network controllers that
allow them to work
Can you reproduce this without VMware modules loaded?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 15:55 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Ok. And am I correct in assuming that if the ABI change would
> > break an OOT module, you would normally change the ABI number?
>
> In the time I've been involved in the kernel team, I haven't
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29~bpo50+1
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1)
(norb...@tretkowski.de) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) ) #1 SMP Wed Dec
1 21:46:07 UTC 2010
** Command line:
root=UUID=62f
firmware-nonfree_0.28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.28.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.28.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.28_all.deb
firmware-atheros_0.28_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.28_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.28_all.deb
firmware-brcm80211_0.28_a
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 19:31 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 03:32 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > Try this. I've made it reasonably generic so you can easily add other
> > hidden dependencies like tg3 -> broadcom.
> >
> > Ben.
> >
>
> I wrote a couple of macros for Karmic to solve a r
On 01/03/2011 03:32 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Try this. I've made it reasonably generic so you can easily add other
hidden dependencies like tg3 -> broadcom.
Ben.
I wrote a couple of macros for Karmic to solve a race problem that might
be applicable here. I think there are several areas of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 598470 + pending
Bug #598470 [firmware-bnx2] bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in
"firmware-bnx2"
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #598470 to the same
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:50:53 +
with message-id <1294105853.3167.257.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: firmware-linux: please include ihex2fw tool into one of
linux-* packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #603775,
regarding firmware-linux: please include ihex2fw tool int
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 598470 + pending
Bug #598470 [firmware-bnx2] bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in
"firmware-bnx2"
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #598470 to the same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 602450 + pending
Bug #602450 [firmware-nonfree] firmware-nonfree: Please add
rtlwifi/rtl8712u.bin, needed by r8712u >= 2.6.37, to firmware-realtek
Added tag(s) pend
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 564628 + pending
Bug #564628 [src:firmware-nonfree] Add Realtek RTL8168D firmware
Bug #587960 [src:firmware-nonfree] [Debian] Where can I find rtl81638d-2.fw
firmwa
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:57 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +]:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > > * Ben Hutchings [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM
> > > +]:
> > > > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess
Well, that's odd. There's certainly support for ACPI backlight control
in your firmware, and it goes via opregion so it should work correctly.
I think the thing to do here is to have the panasonic driver bail if
there's ACPI backlight support, and then figure out why the ACPI video
driver isn't
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:14:40AM +0800, Cristopher Camacho wrote:
> No, there is no. Only the /sys/class/backlight/panasonic/ directory is
> present.
Can you attach the output of the acpidump command on your system?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Is there a /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 directory as well as the
Panasonic one?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
No, there is no. Only the /sys/class/backlight/panasonic/ directory is present.
Cristopher
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Is there a /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 directory as well as the
> Panasonic one?
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
>
--
To UNS
* Ben Hutchings [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +]:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > * Ben Hutchings [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM
> > +]:
> > > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > So, at least a workaround would be for the initram
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM +]:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
> > > issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root file
* Mikko Tuumanen [2011-01-03 20:57]:
> Should this bug report then be filed against the installer?
A new version of the installer is currently in preparation. When a
new version is in preparation, the old version of the netboot images
are broken since the kernel and modules get out of sync. Unt
* Ben Hutchings [Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:03:37PM +]:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
> > issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems.
> > This is easily reproducible, I installed from a re
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
> issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems.
>
> This is easily reproducible, I installed from a recent daily build
> netinst, put /boot on ext3 and / on btrfs an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 608138 + pending
Bug #608138 [linux-2.6] Annoying warning "NMI watchdog failed to create perf
event on cpu0"
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping proces
I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems.
This is easily reproducible, I installed from a recent daily build
netinst, put /boot on ext3 and / on btrfs and same problem on boot.
The problem is that btrfs depends on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 608804 + moreinfo
Bug #608804 [linux-2.6] linux-image-amd64: /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online
is 1 without power cable plugged in
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
608
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 17:04 +0100, Martin Kraus wrote:
> Package: linux-image-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32+28
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
>
> After cold boot without power cable plugged in
> /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online is 1 which
> leaves on_ac_power returning wrong information for
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:19 +0100, Andrea Spadaccini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>> This is presumably caused by a bug in rtl8187. However, it is not a
> >>> general protection fault so there may be two different bugs here.
> >>
> >> Yes, the GPF is around sec 30. After that bug, I blacklisted rtl8187,
> >
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 10:12 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:05:32AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:30 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Please can you test whether aesni
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 608538 + d-i
Bug #608538 [btrfs-tools] Didn't include required module in initramfs
Bug #602254 [btrfs-tools] Didn't include required module in initramfs
Added tag(s) d-i.
Added tag(s) d-i.
> reassign 608538 initramfs-tools
Bug #608538 [btrfs-
> Those are the installer kernel and initrd, which are an older version
> than the kernel and modules that get installed in the filesystem. You
I want to install to a usb stick and I can't because sd_mod doesn't load.
# modprobe sd_mod
FATAL: Error inserting sd_mod (/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-
kirkwo
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 19:36 +0200, Mikko Tuumanen wrote:
> I have the same problem when trying to install with
>
> http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
> armel/current/images/kirkwood/netboot/marvell/sheevaplug/uImage
> and
> http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/m
I have the same problem when trying to install with
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
armel/current/images/kirkwood/netboot/marvell/sheevaplug/uImage
and
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
armel/current/images/kirkwood/netboot/marvell/sheevapl
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:05:32AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:30 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
> > > Please can you test whether aesni-intel loads and works in:
> > >
> > > 1. Package version 2.6.32
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 608804 linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
Bug #608804 [linux-image-amd64] linux-image-amd64:
/sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online is 1 without power cable plugged in
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-amd64' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 2.6.32+28
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
After cold boot without power cable plugged in
/sys/class/power_supply/ACAD/online is 1 which
leaves on_ac_power returning wrong information for packages like
laptop-mode-tools.
Hardware used is Lenovo ThinkPad SL4
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I have put some test packages with the patches discussed further up the
> bug (less the pte_flags one as mentioned) at:
> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/2.6.32-29+xen0/
> Please could you test and let me know how you get on. In p
Hi,
This is presumably caused by a bug in rtl8187. However, it is not a
general protection fault so there may be two different bugs here.
Yes, the GPF is around sec 30. After that bug, I blacklisted rtl8187,
and resulted in the other GPFs at boot time that are not logged.
Can you try blackl
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:02:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...' does
> not make it clear that this is a fatal error for the watchdog. It
> also currently prints the error value as a pointer, rather than
> extracting the error code w
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:40:03AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:24:28 Nicolas Limare wrote:
> > I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
> >
> > Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
> >
> What is Bug#587014? Do you ha
On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:24:28 Nicolas Limare wrote:
> I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
>
> Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
>
What is Bug#587014? Do you have a link?
Panasonic is the only driver which will always try to use
native b
Hi,
On 12/22/2010 10:34 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I was wondering about clamping something in the kernel to correspond to
CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY and avoid the issue but you say the crash
is after "x VCPUS" and before "Scrubbing Free RAM" so I'm surprised the
dom0 kernel has run at this point
42 matches
Mail list logo
