Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 606713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32310
Bug #606713 [linux-2.6] screen power and lid open/close issues
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32310'.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 606686 + moreinfo
Bug #606686 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem: problem mounting CD,
even as a loop device
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
606686: http://bug
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 23:44 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-27
> Severity: important
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem when I try to mount a CD image, regardless of whether
> it's a physical CD in a drive, or an ISO image on the file system. I've
> tried diff
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: important
Hello,
I have a problem when I try to mount a CD image, regardless of whether
it's a physical CD in a drive, or an ISO image on the file system. I've
tried different images, to be sure. This is what I get (one sample):
Dec 10 23:38:48 d
> > I'm looking for old kernel debian images to track down in which kernel
> > some problem with rs232 handling was introduced.
> > I'm looking for kernel images starting at 2.16.18 upto 2.6.26 (but of
> > course not including as it is on the web), i386 images.
> > Where can I find these?
>
> http
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 19:17:43 +0100, folkert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for old kernel debian images to track down in which kernel
> some problem with rs232 handling was introduced.
> I'm looking for kernel images starting at 2.16.18 upto 2.6.26 (but of
> course not including as it is on the
Hi,
I'm looking for old kernel debian images to track down in which kernel
some problem with rs232 handling was introduced.
I'm looking for kernel images starting at 2.16.18 upto 2.6.26 (but of
course not including as it is on the web), i386 images.
Where can I find these?
Thanks.
Folkert van He
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 606589 important
Bug #606589 [xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64]
xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 doesn't upgrade from
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> reassign 606589 xen-hypervisor
severity 606589 important
reassign 606589 xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64
merge 606590 606589
thanks
At the core this is the same issue as 606590. I think a single report is
enough to allow this to be fixed in the relevant place, if the kernel
ends up being the place to fix then the bug can be reassigned
* Gordon Farquharson [2010-12-07 12:53]:
> That makes sense because I think that the installer is configured to
> run in low memory mode for this system (tbm would know for sure). The
> system has 128 MB of RAM.
It has nothing to do with RAM but with flash. Some ARM machines have
too little flas
Hi Russell,
I'm sorry this bug went unanswered for so long, it must have fallen
through the cracks.
Do you still have this issue with the kernels now in Squeeze?
If so please could you try and collect a serial log or perhaps add
"noreboot" to the hypervisor command line, which should cause it to
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-29_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-29_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-29.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-29.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-29.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-29.dsc
linux-base_2.6.32-29_all.deb
to main/l
linux-2.6_2.6.32-29_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-29.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-29.diff.gz
linux-support-2.6.32-5_2.6.32-29_all.deb
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-29_all.deb
linux-base_2.6.32-29_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-29_
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606096: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #606096,
regarding linux-2.6: Please reset CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE to upstream default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606050: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #606050,
regarding perf (GPLv2-only) linked with libbfd (GPLv3-only), so undistributable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#605450: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #605450,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch
driver of Macbookpro 7,1.
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#605448: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #605448,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: xen dom0 and domU hang on reboot/halt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#605246: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #605246,
regarding Built-in 3G modem can prevent sleep mode
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604457: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #604457,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting an lvm-on-md LV to Xen as a
disk results in kernel errors and corrupt filesystem
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604956: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #604956,
regarding [KVM] AQEMU/KVM segmentation fault after upgrade. Libc related.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604956: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #604956,
regarding CVE-2010-3698 fix crashes i386 KVM userspace with amd64 kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604748: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #604748,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx: kernel stack trace errors in pppol2tp.ko
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604457: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #604457,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in
error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger t
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604083: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #604083,
regarding add support for megaraid 9240 9260 9280 8704 8708 8880
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#603632: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #603632,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Linux kernel 2.6.32/xen/amd64 booting
fine on bare metal, but not as dom0 with Xen 4.0.1
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601187: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #601187,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please apply patch for shared I/O region
support
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#600694: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #600694,
regarding [INTL:es] Updated Spanish debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590226: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #590226,
regarding linux-tools-2.6: depends on specific versions of binutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:25 +0100, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy wrote:
> So is this also fixed in linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 ?
> I don't see this close message related to these kernel version!
The fixed version is uploading now (2.6.32-29).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything d
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:33:28 +
with message-id <1291988008.19763.36.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#604956: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64
2.6.36-1~experimental.1 is also affected
has caused the Debian Bug report #604956,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: segfault
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:33:28 +
with message-id <1291988008.19763.36.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#604956: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64
2.6.36-1~experimental.1 is also affected
has caused the Debian Bug report #604956,
regarding [KVM] AQEMU/KVM segmentation fault a
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:33:28 +
with message-id <1291988008.19763.36.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#604956: linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64
2.6.36-1~experimental.1 is also affected
has caused the Debian Bug report #604956,
regarding CVE-2010-3698 fix crashes i386 KVM u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 604956 2.6.36-1~experimental.1
Bug #604956 [linux-2.6] CVE-2010-3698 fix crashes i386 KVM userspace with amd64
kernel
Bug #605546 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: segfault when trying to
start kvm processes
Bug #605800 [linux-2.6] [
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 09:08 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
> > I have no idea what the upstream developers intended, they seem a bit
> > clueless about distribution. I only just realised that they try to use
> > libbfd (GPLv3, incompatible) even though perf can get the
Hi,
I installed linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64 version
2.6.36-1~experimental.1 from experimental
and the problem is there too.
Dec 10 10:55:16 bobek kernel: [ 1756.474167] kvm[16483]: segfault at ff8c
ip f720c047 sp f684618c error 6 in
libc-2.11.2.so[f7148000+14]
I'm run
I tested with 2.6.37-rc3.
Nothing changes. Still the same kind of crashes. I also played with all
combinations of ACPI and APM but no change.
I searched a while and noticed the error already exists:
Bug#454747
Bug#11663
Bug#584724
As pointed out though, the original scheduling while atomics oops o
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.1_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc5-1~experimental.1.
37 matches
Mail list logo