From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:53:35 +
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 17:26 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Greg KH
>> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
>>
>> > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
>> > this also.
>>
>> I'm not applying this
Hi !
> The error message about 'domain->cpu_power' does not refer to power
> management, but to the scheduler's estimation of the processing power of
> each group of processor threads.
>
> The scheduler is trying to group the processor threads by:
>
> - NUMA node (NODE; sharing a connection to R
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 08:28 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:53:54 + Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Neil, would you mind looking at this:
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 10:49 +0100, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote:
> > > Ben,
> > >
> > > I'm running 4 days now without any disk errors a
Please can you test whether this is fixed in 2.6.32-28? We backported a
KVM feature (VCPU_EVENTS) which meant we needed an additional fix beyond
the one which Michael Tokarev identified, and that was done in -28.
Note, by the way, that an i386 version of qemu-kvm will not work with
the amd64 kern
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: important
If a cdrom is inserted, things work for a short while. I can for instance read
one or two
files on the CD. But, invariably, it stops working and a number of error
messages are logged.
Typical messages are:
[ 329.673137] UDF-fs: Partiti
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 22:29 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote:
> Could someone tell me what is the state of this bug? What can I do to
> help to fix the problem?
Well, you can prompt me to look again, as you did. :-)
It seems that the code I changed, which looks like it sets the valid
chann
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 17:39 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg KH
> > Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
> >
> > > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
> > > this also.
> >
> > I'm not applying
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH
> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
>
> > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
> > this also.
>
> I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to.
>
> If people think this prot
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 17:26 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH
> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
>
> > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
> > this also.
>
> I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to.
>
> If people think this protocol is
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 20:23 -0500, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-27
> Severity: normal
>
> I formulated a bug report (#583968) about this laptop not being able
> to suspend/hibernate with KMS enabled (Xpress 200m radeon chip). A fix
> was backported from upstream
From: Greg KH
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
> And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
> this also.
I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to.
If people think this protocol is not maintained adequately
right now, wait until you push it into staging
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: normal
I set up a new wireless router and started getting frequent network
dropouts associated with the message "ipw2100: Fatal interrupt.
Scheduling firmware restart." I have narrowed down the problem to TKIP
encryption in WPA2-PSK. If I use WEP o
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:44:28PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Recent review has revealed several bugs in econet and other obscure
> protocol implementations that can be exploited by local users for
> denial of service or privilege escalation.
>
> The econet protocol (PF_ECONET) is unmaintained.
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 23:34 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
[...]
> == Configuration
>
> The KConfig is the one I use, which is open to discussion (like
> everything else anyway). I've tried to be fairly secure, so some
> features might not work for some people.
>
> When possible, options are con
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:17 +0100, Frede Feuerstein wrote:
> Hi !
>
> > This shows something about what's going wrong. Could you please try
> > adding 'debug' to the kernel parameters? That will show some more
> > context for these errors.
>
> I booted 2.6.32-5 with the debug option on, and for
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:09:57 +
with message-id <1290899397.3292.62.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#604676: linux-2.6: include fix for aluminium
powerbooks keyboards
has caused the Debian Bug report #604676,
regarding linux-2.6: include fix for aluminium powerbooks key
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 604748 + pending
Bug #604748 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx] linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx: kernel
stack trace errors in pppol2tp.ko
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of mess
Let me repeat:
> > Also send the output of 'lspci -vn', and the output of 'dmesg' when the
> > system is booted without pci=noacpi.
^^^
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
Recent review has revealed several bugs in econet and other obscure
protocol implementations that can be exploited by local users for
denial of service or privilege escalation.
The econet protocol (PF_ECONET) is unmaintained. There appear to be
no published applications for it, and it has never p
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
(resending without attachments so it's not too big for the list, they
can be found on the bug report, sorry for the inconvenience)
Hey people,
First, please excuse me, I wasn't able to attend the Paris Miniconf and
thus the kernel summit, to prop
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 19:48 +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
[...]
> I don't know how to help further to increase the chances that
> squeeze will have support for these controllers.
>
> If you could point me to some instructions I could follow to give
> you some useful feedback I'll be happy to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 604457 + upstream
Bug #604457 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to
xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"
Bug #461644 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting an lvm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 604083 + pending
Bug #604083 [linux-2.6] add support for megaraid 9240 9260 9280 8704 8708 8880
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing her
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:53:54 + Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Neil, would you mind looking at this:
>
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 10:49 +0100, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote:
> > Ben,
> >
> > I'm running 4 days now without any disk errors anymore.
> > As stated in my previous message this is with the RedHat
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 15:38 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo writes:
>
> > I've just tested 2.6.32-28 from latest iso and it still doesn't work.
> > The version of this driver included in experimental is reported to work
> > on other distribution (0.17).
> >
> > If you'd point me
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 10:31 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the previous set of patches, attached is another patch needed
> for proper support of the new MacBook Air machines.
>
> USB seems troublesome and doesn't work properly without
Neil, would you mind looking at this:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 10:49 +0100, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I'm running 4 days now without any disk errors anymore.
> As stated in my previous message this is with the RedHat patch applied.
>
> If I compair the patches I see that the patch you gr
Network just crashed again.
I will compile/install the new kernel first and try copying again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cf13f71.2030...@gmx
> I think that is needed. If it works with mainline kernel then we can
> start looking for the patch that fixed it. If it doesn't work then you
> can report the bug upstream.
I guess I will then. Thanks for sharing. Nice to know, there are others
with the same rare issues.
Marcel
--
To UNSUB
here is the output of lspci -vv
$ lspci -vv
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and
945GT Express Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device 0090
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Marcel Langner writes:
> Does a report exists for this transmit timeout problem already?
I don't know. I have hit the issue only twice and it is difficult to
debug so I did not report it yet.
> No I have not. Do you think it makes sense to try it? It's a long time
> since I compiled my own kerne
Marcel Langner writes:
> Bug seems to exist for a long time now. Should be fixed before Squeeze
> gets out officially!
1) Are the "scheduling while atomic" and "transmit timed out"
different bugs?
2) Have you tried if this occurs with mainline kernel from kernel.org?
I have a geode box with
$
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> I am guessing you are doing (a) today --- am I right? (c) or (d)
> would be best.
Are there any plans to provide an API for atomic (non-durable) file
updates, not involving fsync?
Would be simpler (for apps), faster and more general (because it
dmesg output
[ 861.86] WARNING: at
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-27-i386-c5N4Hf/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/net/sched/sch_generic.c:261
dev_watchdog+0xdb/0x170()
[ 861.000115] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1 (via-rhine): transmit queue 0 timed out
[ 861.000129] Modules linked in:
Ben,
I'm running 4 days now without any disk errors anymore.
As stated in my previous message this is with the RedHat patch applied.
If I compair the patches I see that the patch you grabed upstream does not deal
with t->limits.max_sectors
Thanks for a reply
Wouter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Hi!
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:52:54 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:53:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Just to sum up what dpkg --unpack does in 1.15.8.6:
> > 1/ set the package status as half-installed/reinst-required
> > 2/ extract all the new files as *.dpkg-new
> > 3/
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Following the previous set of patches, attached is another patch needed
for proper support of the new MacBook Air machines.
USB seems troublesome and doesn't work properly without this patch.
Thanks,
JB.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > c) extract(a.dpkg-new);
> > extract(b.dpkg-new);
> > extract(c.dpkg-new);
> > fsync(a.dpkg-new);
> > fsync(b.dpkg-new);
> > fsync(c.dpkg-new);
> > rename(a.dpkg-new, a);
> > rename(b.dpkg-new, b);
> > rename(c.dpkg-new
38 matches
Mail list logo
