Greetings,
Is this still an active thread? What progress is there at the moment? I
have the same problem with my laptop currently. Losing what you have
open and needing to reboot is painful.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Finally, x25 (*not* ax25) appears to have no applications in Debian.
Google Code Search found only 4 hits for AF_X25 or PF_X25 outside of the
kernel, header files or language bindings:
ean - X.400 message handling software
http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#C_8T3NZHV74/pub/Apps/ean.tar.Z|yK
The first patch did not include PowerMac9,1. Corrected patch is attached
to this message.
Thanks,
Milan
diff -Nru ./hooks/thermal ../initramfs-tools-0.98.5/hooks/thermal
--- ./hooks/thermal 2010-09-23 14:43:51.0 -0400
+++ ../initramfs-tools-0.98.5/hooks/thermal 2010-11-18 21:54:21.000
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 03:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Unlike device or filesystem modules, most protocol modules may be auto-
> loaded on behalf of local users without any special capabilities. This
> means that security vulnerabilities in such protocol modules may be
> exploitable by local us
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 03:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Unlike device or filesystem modules, most protocol modules may be auto-
> loaded on behalf of local users without any special capabilities. This
> means that security vulnerabilities in such protocol modules may be
> exploitable by local us
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
On iMac and PowerMac G5 machines, about a minute after boot, fans run at
full speed producing jet engine noise. Thermal modules do not get loaded
as they were in Lenny.
diff -Nru ./hooks/thermal ../initramfs-tools-0.98.5/hook
Hi!
I started to get GPU hung problems here too (with X being killed).
dmesg says:
[drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
[drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request returns -5 (awaiting
28966 at 28956)
and the xorg log is attached.
Kernel is a 2.6
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I think I mentioned this a while back on irc, but filing here for
reference. clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) is expensive, so people want
to use CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE instead. See e.g.
http://lists.x.org/pipermail/xorg-devel/2010-Augu
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:05:55PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:23:39AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Why? These patches are well maintained, and touch areas of the kernel that
> > do not change much (making them very easy to merge). Why leave non-PAE
> > x86 users out in
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:06:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:03:33PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Now, don't get me wrong, I'd hugely prefer there be an __init-like way to
> > handle this, and it actually touches on the constification work too. Still,
> > blocking unti
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:37:44PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:23:39 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:52:12 +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > LSM: Enable AppArmor? as well as/instead of Tomoyo?
> > > ---
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:03:33PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:37:44PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:23:39 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:52:12 +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > LSM: Enable AppArmor
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:23:39AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:52:12 +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > LSM: Enable AppArmor? as well as/instead of Tomoyo?
> > ---
> > As the LSM need to be built we can't enable them. This ne
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:52:12 +, maximilian attems wrote:
> LSM: Enable AppArmor? as well as/instead of Tomoyo?
> ---
> As the LSM need to be built we can't enable them. This needs a technical
> solution were code can be disregarded as init sec
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:23:39 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:52:12 +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > LSM: Enable AppArmor? as well as/instead of Tomoyo?
> > ---
> > As the LSM need to be built we can't enable them. This nee
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98
When using multipath, it is possible that mountroot() will race with
udev's renaming of /dev/disk/by-uuid/{rootfs-uuid} from /dev/sd?? to
/dev/mapper/something. After multipath has grabbed the /dev/sd?? and
until udev completes the rename, mounting
/dev/disk
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 572535
Bug #572535 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools:
Wrong size shown of btrfs partition after migrating from ext4
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remov
Accepted:
linux-kbuild-2.6.36_2.6.36-1~experimental.1_i386.deb
to
main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.36_2.6.36-1~experimental.1_i386.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.36-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.36-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.36
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:48:02PM +0100, masterdead wrote:
> i forgot symptoms: System randomly unresponsive, sometimes keyboard
> input will yield repeated keystrokes. SSH session will stop echoing. And
> basically system freezes over
> to 2-10 minutes.
>
> I believe this bug relates to #5174
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 602078 - moreinfo
Bug #602078 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-amd64: Wake-up does a full
restart !
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
602078: http://bugs.debian.org
i forgot symptoms: System randomly unresponsive, sometimes keyboard
input will yield repeated keystrokes. SSH session will stop echoing. And
basically system freezes over
to 2-10 minutes.
I believe this bug relates to #517449
Proper report witch reportbug? How to?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 03:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> +alias net-pf-36 af_802154
>
> I have no idea of the security state of this. I was able to create
> AF_IEEE802154 sockets on system with no suitable devices.
According to Vince Sanders who works on both Linux and 802.15.4 hardware
t
Sorry!!!
Here my configuration files.
Ciao, Filippo.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: L
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:14:33PM +0100, masterdead wrote:
> anyone to help me with this problem?
>
you were asked to properly submit info with reportbug.
currently there is zero info related to up to date 2.6.32
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:29:35AM +, Tim Small wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.98.5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> The documentation is vague about how the list of modules is derived.
>
> Hopefully this makes things clearer without requiring the user to delve
> into the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 603858 important
Bug #603858 [initramfs-tools] Mount options for proc conflict with /etc/fstab
breaking /etc/init.d/mountall.sh
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 603858 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
severity 603858 important
thanks
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: initramfs-tools
>> Version: 0.93.4
>> Severity: critical
>> File: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
>> Tags: patch
>
> How in the world does this count as "cr
You meantion SCHED_IDLE only in the subject but don't elaborate it in
the bug report itself. What do you mean by it exactly?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.d
anyone to help me with this problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ce518a9.2020...@gmail.com
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6'
> retitle 592487 linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686: dom0 under virtualbox: APIC
> write causes WARNING
Bug #59
Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:57:16 +0200
with message-id <84zkt6lx0z@sauna.l.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: does not boot Package:
linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-13 Severity: important
has caused the Debian Bug report #583895,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-
I confirm this is fixed now.
Il giorno 18/nov/2010, alle ore 09.00, Timo Juhani Lindfors ha scritto:
>
> Kind of hard to debug without console output indeed. Does the kernel
> boot without xen? Have you tried 2.6.32-27?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The documentation is vague about how the list of modules is derived.
Hopefully this makes things clearer without requiring the user to delve
into the source code
Cheers,
Tim.
--- /tmp/initramfs.conf.orig2010-11-18 1
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 09:19 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:40:43AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
>
> > Hmm. So you are running an X server in the dom0 or in a domU?
>
> In the dom0.
Please could you try the kernel at http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/
and see
Hi again,
with qemu-kvm from experimental (0.13.0+dfsg-2) you can use:
-cpu kvm64,-kvmclock
as kvm option to disable kvmclock.
for libvirt use the following in your domain config:
...
(You may have to replace kvm64 with another cpu model)
I tried using clocksource= in the li
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64', 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64',
'li
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:40:43AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Hmm. So you are running an X server in the dom0 or in a domU?
In the dom0.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64'
Limit currently set to 'package':'xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64'
> reassign 602935 linux-2.6
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 23:57 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 19:44 +0100, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-27
> > Severity: important
> >
> > I've got a KVM virtual machine which is using bacula-fd to back-up its
> > files to another virtual mach
With
$ dpkg-query -W linux-image-$(uname -r)
linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-27
I see
$ find /dev|grep evt
/dev/.udev/db/misc:xen/evtchn
/dev/xen/evtchn
Does everything work if you create evtchn manually with mknod
/dev/xen/evtchn c 10 57?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-
Kind of hard to debug without console output indeed. Does the kernel
boot without xen? Have you tried 2.6.32-27?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84s
41 matches
Mail list logo
