Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
I've been doing some exciting initramfs hacking and I found that my
hook scripts were not working because although I call update-initramfs
with /usr/local/{sbin,bin} on my path, they were being removed.
$ dpkg -L initramfs-tools | xargs grep PATH
/usr/sbin/
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if the "copy_exec" function in the initramfs-tools
hook script helper functions searched for source executables from the
PATH (and failed if they weren't found!)
That would make it easier to write hook scripts which (a) d
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: important
If an initramfs hook script exits with a nonzero exit status,
update-initramfs carries on anyway!
To reproduce:
1. create /etc/initramfs-tools/hooks/broken containing
#!/bin/sh -e
broken!
2. run update-initramfs in a way that make
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:51:16PM -0400, Jon wrote:
>
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-23
> Justification: root security hole
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
>
> The changelog says the CVE-2010-3301 was fixed in this update:
> * x86-64, compat (CVE-2010-3301):
> - Retruncate
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:51:16 -0400 Jon wrote:
>
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-23
> Justification: root security hole
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
>
> The changelog says the CVE-2010-3301 was fixed in this update:
> * x86-64, compat (CVE-2010-3301):
> - Retruncate rax a
Your message dated Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:14:36 +0100
with message-id <1285024476.2697.85.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#597576: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32-23 still
vulnerable to CVE-2010-3301
has caused the Debian Bug report #597576,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32-23
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Justification: root security hole
Severity: critical
Tags: security
The changelog says the CVE-2010-3301 was fixed in this update:
* x86-64, compat (CVE-2010-3301):
- Retruncate rax after ia32 syscall entry tracing
- Test %rax for the syscall numbe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 595554 + pending
Bug #595554 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6] 3c59x hangs
on Vortex cards
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 597544 + moreinfo
Bug #597544 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686 crash in 3c59x init
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
597544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 19:50 +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
>
> With 2.6.35, I got a kernel panic a couple of
> seconds after I select an image to load.
Please send the panic message. A screenshot will do but yo
Hello,
I have just found the time to try the experimental module which has been renamed
rt2800pci in the 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 version of the
linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-686
packet (actually, I am using this module to send this message, so it seems to
work pretty well).
I also take some extra tim
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all-hppa_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all-hppa_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-23_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-parisc_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-parisc_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
linux-image-2.6.32-5-parisc-smp_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
linux-headers-2.6.32-5-parisc-smp_2.6.32-23_hppa.deb
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
Hi,
With 2.6.35, I got a kernel panic a couple of
seconds after I select an image to load.
I look the same bug than #589989
Matthieu
-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached
** Model inform
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #596704 (http://bugs.debian.org/596704)
# * https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
> So, it worked if I have specified in Dom0 in the "baloon" mode by omitting
> the specification of dom0_mem or, if dom0_mem is specified then also the
> swiotlb=65536 must be specified.
Wow. That implies that AACRAID uses quite a lot of buffers, and looking at the
driver
there are a bunch of qui
>linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-23_amd64.deb
works for me without errors, thanks!
--
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikultryhf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 597489 moreinfo
Bug #597489 [linux-2.6] kswapd ownes the whole cpu resources, unable to reboot
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:27:12AM +0200, Thomas Poo wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32-21~bpo50+1
> Severity: important
>
>
> /var/log/kern.log: http://pastebin.com/FVV25wf4
You must send this information to the bug report, not to some other
web site where it wil
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 597489 linux-2.6
Bug #597489 [linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64] kswapd ownes the whole cpu
resources, unable to reboot
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64' t
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-21~bpo50+1
Severity: important
/var/log/kern.log: http://pastebin.com/FVV25wf4
libc6: 2.7-18lenny4
System: Dell PowerEdge R710
Hi - we have some problems with backported kernels for a few weeks. This is the
first time that we got a nice ou
* Ben Hutchings [2010-09-19 20:53]:
> That leaves colo and sibyl (both mips/mipsel).
colo does not have to be called when upgrading a kernel; I cannot
remember what sibyl needs.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
23 matches
Mail list logo
