Processed: submitter 596405

2010-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 596405 chm...@phil.muni.cz Bug #596405 [linux-2.6] Debian Squeeze Kernel incompatibility issue with Toshiba Satellite L650D notebook Changed Bug submitter to 'chm...@phil.muni.cz' from 'Ben Hutchings ' > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#596405: Debian Squeeze Kernel incompatibility issue with Toshiba Satellite L650D notebook

2010-09-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:50 +0200, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote: > Dear core developers of The Debian kernel, > > I would like to very kindly please You for an advice. I AM using > Toshiba Satellite L650D laptop with The following technical > specification: > ¨ > Model: > Satellite L650D > BIOS v

Bug#596405: Debian Squeeze Kernel incompatibility issue with Toshiba Satellite L650D notebook

2010-09-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Forwarded Message From: Mgr. Janusz Chmiel To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Subject: Debian Squeeze Kernel incompatibility issue with Toshiba Satellite L650D notebook Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:50:53 +0200 Dear core developers of The Debi

Bug#596394: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#596394: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: cannot make linux headers, missing basic + tools Makefile)

2010-09-10 Thread johnny bravo
And why do you close a bug without confirmation from the reporter that it is actually solved, which is definately not the case here?

Bug#596394: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#596394: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: cannot make linux headers, missing basic + tools Makefile)

2010-09-10 Thread johnny bravo
Running from that folders gives exact the same error: r...@nas:/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-kirkwood/build# make /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/scripts/Makefile.build:44: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/scripts/basic/Makefile: No such file or directory make[4]: *** No rule to make ta

Bug#596394: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: cannot make linux headers, missing basic + tools Makefile)

2010-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:59:16 +0100 with message-id <1284159556.5323.612.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#596394: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: cannot make linux headers, missing basic + tools Makefile has caused the Debian Bug report #596394, regarding linux-headers-2.6

Processed: tagging 596390

2010-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 596390 + moreinfo Bug #596390 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 596390: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#596390: Log messages from 2.6.30 and 2.6.32

2010-09-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:31 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote: > Here's the full kernel log from both versions, taken a couple of > minutes apart. > > I've had this trouble for quite some time, ever since 2.6.32 made it > into lenny-backports. I'd like to get on the new kernel version and > eliminate

Bug#596394: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: cannot make linux headers, missing basic + tools Makefile

2010-09-10 Thread Johnny Mijnhout
Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: important When trying to run make on the linux headers, this is the result: r...@nas:/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-kirkwood# make /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/scripts/Makefile.build:44: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.3

Bug#596390: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready

2010-09-10 Thread Shawn Heisey
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-20~bpo50+1 Severity: important WHen I boot this kernel, my ethernet port stops working. The light on the switch goes out. It is a Cisco 3550 switch with 10 10/100/1000 ports and two GBIC ports. This server is plugged into a 10/100/1000 port. In order to get

Bug#596371: marked as done ((no subject))

2010-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:41:31 +0100 with message-id <20100910194130.gd11...@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#596371: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #596371, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#596371: (no subject)

2010-09-10 Thread Konrad Zimmermann
Subject: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: usb 2.0 controller is managed as usb 1.1 by ohci-hcd Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: normal According to the manual, my board has 5 external and 4 internal USB 2.0 connectors. However as seen from lspci and lsusb, some of those are detected as

Bug#594845: [PATCH] tun: Don't add sysfs attributes to devices without sysfs directories

2010-09-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
Prior to Linux 2.6.35, net devices outside the initial net namespace did not have sysfs directories. Attempting to add attributes to them will trigger a BUG(). Reported-and-tested-by: Russell Stuart Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- This applies to 2.6.32 *only*. It has not been applied upstrea

Debian Squeeze Kernel incompatibility issue with Toshiba Satellite L650D notebook

2010-09-10 Thread Mgr. Janusz Chmiel
Dear core developers of The Debian kernel, I would like to very kindly please You for an advice. I AM using Toshiba Satellite L650D laptop with The following technical specification: ¨ Model: Satellite L650D BIOS version 1.30 CPU AMD Turion(tm) II P520 Dual-Core Processor It is 64 bit CPU

Bug#583949:

2010-09-10 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:00:32AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> tags 583949 + squeeze sid >> thanks > > Please don't do that.  Those tags mean "this bug only affects squeeze > and sid, even if lenny has a version marked as buggy".  Thi

Bug#595711: more specific information

2010-09-10 Thread George Shuklin
Sad, but still not working - same behavior Here simplest test. 1. Set mem=512, maxmem=15GiB (for XCP it is xe vm-memory-limits-set static-min=512MiB static-max=15GiB dynamic-min=2GiB dynamic-max=2GiB). 2. Boot vm. 3. Disable swap. 4. Run following in python (I test is with not only python, but w

initramfs-tools_0.98.3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-09-10 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: initramfs-tools_0.98.3.dsc to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.98.3.dsc initramfs-tools_0.98.3.tar.gz to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.98.3.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.98.3_all.deb to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.98.3_all.deb Override entries for you

Bug#595711: more specific information

2010-09-10 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 15:52 +0400, George Shuklin wrote: > My guess was wrong and this patch do not change situation. Thanks for the extra info. Please could you try the kernel now at http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/2.6.26-25+balloon1/ Compared with +balloon0 I added a patch which I noticed

Processing of initramfs-tools_0.98.3_amd64.changes

2010-09-10 Thread Archive Administrator
initramfs-tools_0.98.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initramfs-tools_0.98.3.dsc initramfs-tools_0.98.3.tar.gz initramfs-tools_0.98.3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#596297: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: unrar crashed with kernel error message

2010-09-10 Thread Stefan Arnold
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-21 Severity: important Tags: squeeze As I told the kernel gave me a error message during unpacking an archive. The unrar process did not die and i could not even kill it with -9. Afterwards thunar hung up as i tried to rename a file, console and other stuff still