Hi,
after a fresh boot and about 30 minutes of work the bug arose again:
Linux liberty 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:34:03 UTC 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
[ 1272.317057] No probe response from AP 00:0f:66:c7:75:52 after 500ms,
disconnecting.
[ 1272.944365] iwlagn :03:00.0: Error sending REPL
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 23:47 +0200, GSR wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.1
> Severity: normal
>
> When the disk system is used heavily, for example installing software
> or writing a big file, a warning is reported. It happens multiple
> times in a short time, I trimmed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 588250 bluez 4.66-1
Bug #588250 [linux-2.6] ioctl32(bluetoothd:24030): Unknown cmd fd(25)
cmd(400448e7){t:'H'; sz:4}...
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'bluez'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-15.
Bug #588250
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 588164 + pending
Bug #588164 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x: kernel NULL pointer dereference while loading
module parport_pc
Ignor
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.34-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
When the disk system is used heavily, for example installing software
or writing a big file, a warning is reported. It happens multiple
times in a short time, I trimmed the report below to show the first
and second warnings only
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Tue Jul 6 20:03:37 UTC 2010
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: php-mime-type
> tags 561875 + pending
Bug #561875 [wnpp] ITP: php-mime-type -- U
On 06/ 9/10 10:41 AM, Steven Shiau wrote:
On 2010年06月06日 04:29, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 17:08 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On 05/24/10 11:22 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
[...]
We can probably remove the reverse mapping constraint for presentation
addresses. A simple fix might be t
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 08:37:54PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 08:31 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> >On Tue, 06 Jul 2010, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> >
> >
> >>An OpenVZ user Benjamin Henrion (cced) reported a bug (see below,
> >>also [1], [2]) which is already fixed in our latest ker
On 07/06/2010 08:31 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
An OpenVZ user Benjamin Henrion (cced) reported a bug (see below,
also [1], [2]) which is already fixed in our latest kernel 2.6.32-budarin.1
(by commit 7e99ed1bc34b60ed42eb2008edbb4f98684edb0a).
Can
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> An OpenVZ user Benjamin Henrion (cced) reported a bug (see below,
> also [1], [2]) which is already fixed in our latest kernel 2.6.32-budarin.1
> (by commit 7e99ed1bc34b60ed42eb2008edbb4f98684edb0a).
>
> Can you please bring the Debian OpenVZ kernel up-
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 06:43:04PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> Hi debian-kernel,
>
> An OpenVZ user Benjamin Henrion (cced) reported a bug (see below,
> also [1], [2]) which is already fixed in our latest kernel 2.6.32-budarin.1
> (by commit 7e99ed1bc34b60ed42eb2008edbb4f98684edb0a).
>
> Can you
Hi debian-kernel,
An OpenVZ user Benjamin Henrion (cced) reported a bug (see below,
also [1], [2]) which is already fixed in our latest kernel 2.6.32-budarin.1
(by commit 7e99ed1bc34b60ed42eb2008edbb4f98684edb0a).
Can you please bring the Debian OpenVZ kernel up-to-date, which will fix
this bug
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:38:53 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> Perhaps more importantly, why do these architectures use the vmlinux
>> naming convention
>
> Hysterical raisins.
I take that to mean "historical reasons". OK.
>>
>
Accepted:
linux-doc-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux
* Dirk Schleicher [Tue Jul 06, 2010 at 02:39:33PM
+0200]:
> I have problem to update initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
> Richte initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> Verarbeite Trigger für initramfs-tools ...
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/
linux-doc-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-doc-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-
linux-latest-2.6_28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-latest-2.6_28.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_28.tar.gz
linux-doc-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
linux-source-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
linux-tools-2.6_2.6.32+28_all.deb
linux-image-486_2.6.32+28_i386.deb
linux-im
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:52:48 +0200
with message-id <20100706135248.gv9...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#588241: update-initramfs: failed for
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.30-1-686
has caused the Debian Bug report #588241,
regarding update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2
Am Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:55:10 +0200
schrieb maximilian attems:
> > But I run unstable! Is there a newer on in testing?
>
> then please install linux-image-2.6-686 metapackage to keep up
> with latest linux-2.6 :)
>
> did you test newer initramfs-tools? may not have hit .de mirrors yet?
Thanks
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal
From /var/log/syslog:
==
Jul 6 13:56:51 paranoia kernel: [255291.657593] usb 2-1.3: new full speed USB
device using uhci_hcd and address 51
Jul 6 13:56:51 paranoia kernel:
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#588164: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #588164,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x: kernel NULL pointer dereference while
loading module parport_pc
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#588096: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #588096,
regarding linux-2.6: Please enable CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_TI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587985: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #587985,
regarding [firmware-realtek] Please provide a RTL8191S kernel module
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587580: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #587580,
regarding linux-source-2.6.32: bonding (ifenslave) does not work with asix
based usb-network-adapter (ax88178)
to be marked as don
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586967: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #586967,
regarding BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x0101
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586401: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #586401,
regarding linux-libc-dev: Please remove NEWS.Debian.gz
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#585852: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #585852,
regarding Incorrect boot= in lilo.conf after UUID conversion with /boot on LVM
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#585790: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #585790,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Oops in mv_cesa
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#585609: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #585609,
regarding linux-base: Difficult to recover from failed device ID transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584784: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #584784,
regarding /boot/vmlinux-2.6.34-1-4kc-malta: no longer boots in qemu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584945: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #584945,
regarding rtl8192s_usb claims devices that should be handled by rtl8192u_usb,
which is not enabled
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584549: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #584549,
regarding linux-2.6: please enable CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#584130: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #584130,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: please enable CONFIG_KPROBES
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#583139: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #583139,
regarding linux-2.6: no DHCP offers on r8169
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582737: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #582737,
regarding libata: disable ATAPI AN by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#580538: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #580538,
regarding UPDATED Spanish debconf template translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577264: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #577264,
regarding RFP: mantis-driver -- Kernel module for several DVB cards
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#576199: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #576199,
regarding linux-2.6: ATL1E does not longer work on EEE PC 900A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#559406: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #559406,
regarding "Yorick doesn't catch SIGFPE on HPPA"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#548715: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #548715,
regarding please ship tools/perf/perf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#548715: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #548715,
regarding linux-image-2.6-686: are we packaging the upstream shipped tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#536537: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #536537,
regarding linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: reboot fails with a Fit-PC2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#508108: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #508108,
regarding Please enable XVR-500 and XVR-2500 fb drivers for sparc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#514646: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #514646,
regarding ipv6: net.ipv6.conf.*.temp_prefered_lft value is ignored
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#508108: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #508108,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-3-sparc64-smp: XVR-500 and XVR-2500 drivers need
to be re-enabled per bug #508108
to be marked as don
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:33:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#514644: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #514644,
regarding ipv6: net.ipv6.conf.*.temp_valid_lft counter seems to overflow
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:48:20 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > 0. The arguments given to all kernel hook scripts are the kernel ABI
> > version (the string that uname -r reports) and, optionally, the absolute
> > path to the kernel
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-16_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-16_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.dsc
linux-base_2.6.32-16_all.deb
to main/l
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
> Am Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:38:59 +0200
> schrieb maximilian attems:
>
> > unrelated but this kernel is not supported any longer please
> > fetch and install linux image 2.6.32-5 from testing/sid. thanks.
>
> But I run unstable! Is ther
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.diff.gz
linux-support-2.6.32-5_2.6.32-16_all.deb
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-16_all.deb
linux-base_2.6.32-16_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-16_
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:48:20 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> 0. The arguments given to all kernel hook scripts are the kernel ABI
> version (the string that uname -r reports) and, optionally, the absolute
> path to the kernel image. If the second argument is missing then the
> path is eithe
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.97
> Severity: important
outdated version.
> I have problem to update initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
>
>
> Richte initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigge
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-16.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:29:35, the files wil
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.97
> Severity: important
>
> I have problem to update initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
>
>
> Richte initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> Ver
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.97
Severity: important
I have problem to update initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
Richte initramfs-tools ein (0.97) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Verarbeite Trigger für initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img
Hello Debian Kernel Team,
I would like to participate in the Debian kernel efforts.
I have run through the (limited) information on the wiki but am not sure where
to start.
From what I have understood, there's a loose team based on architectures that
interest them. Are there teams also based o
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.95.1
> Severity: normal
>
> i've been testing the newest initramfs-tools network booting support, though
> it
> seems to make 10 DHCP requests in rapid sucession. fortunately, the last DHCP
> request does work.
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:17:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586554: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #586554,
regarding initramfs-tools warn about bogus hooks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:17:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586554: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #586554,
regarding initramfs-tools warn about bogus hooks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.97.2.dsc
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.2.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.97.2.tar.gz
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.2.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.97.2_all.deb
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.2_all.deb
Override entries for you
initramfs-tools_0.97.2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.97.2.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.97.2.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.97.2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 585897 - pending
Bug #585897 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: allow multiple break points
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
585897: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 586554 initramfs-tools warn about bogus hooks
Bug #586554 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to
0.97 due to iscan*
Bug #588140 [initramfs-tools] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: can't install: dpkg:
error processin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 586554 - moreinfo
Bug #586554 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to
0.97 due to iscan*
Bug #588140 [initramfs-tools] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: can't install: dpkg:
error processing linux-image-2.6-amd64
Removed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 586554 pending
Bug #586554 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to
0.97 due to iscan*
Bug #588140 [initramfs-tools] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: can't install: dpkg:
error processing linux-image-2.6-amd64
Added tag(
I'd like to share approved contacts with you on Boxbe
Here's the link: https://www.boxbe.com/register?tc=3568602731_1619269159
-Mike
This message was sent at the request of genkstar...@yahoo.com.
If you want to opt-out of invitations from Boxbe members, use this link:
https://www.boxbe.com/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 579125 linux-2.6
Bug #579125 [linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64] linux-headers-2.6.32-4-amd64: problem
initializing LSI controller
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64' to
67 matches
Mail list logo
