Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The CONFIG_PROC_EVENTS option enables some cool functionality[1], could the
Debian kernel please have it enabled?
[1] http://www.outflux.net/blog/archives/2010/07/01/reporting-all-execs/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
On 07/05/2010 07:19 PM, Brendon Higgins wrote:
Something really odd seems to be going on. It works without errors when I try
this:
awk '{print $2}' $STATE_DIR/clean-files \
| while read file; do
echo "ha"
test -e ${DESTDIR}$file&& rm -f ${DESTDIR}$file
echo "ho"
done
However
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:02:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#588097: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #588097,
regarding firmware-nonfree: Please consider adding firmware for TI Serial
devices
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Accepted:
firmware-atheros_0.26_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-atheros_0.26_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.26_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.26_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.26_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.26_all.deb
firmware-intelwim
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #575648 (http://bugs.debian.org/575648)
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.c
firmware-nonfree_0.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.26.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.26.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.26_all.deb
firmware-atheros_0.26_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.26_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.26_all.deb
firmware-intelwimax_0.26_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:47:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587608: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #587608,
regarding initrampf doesn't create initrd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.97.1.dsc
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.1.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.97.1.tar.gz
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.1.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.97.1_all.deb
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.1_all.deb
Override entries for you
initramfs-tools_0.97.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.97.1.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.97.1.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.97.1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 582737 + pending
Bug #582737 [linux-2.6] libata: disable ATAPI AN by default
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #582737 to the same tags previously set
>
End of m
On 02/07/2010 22:36, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/07/2010 16:16, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 22:15:17 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>>> Since the introduction of KMS, suspend-to-disk never works reliably
>>> on my laptop.
> [...]
>> This may be fixed by commit 98
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 20:16 +0300, Nathan Wallach wrote:
>
> Dear Ben,
>
> I found the thread at
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440
[...]
> I saw that there are different patchs from about a week ago at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570350
> but ther
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:21:34PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> dpkg -S mkinitramfs-kpkg would have shown you that initramfs-tools
> is the package who carries the mkinitramfs command.
that's what i needed !
thanks!
> see above, hope it helped?
absolutely!
> > > dpkg -l iscan*
> > how did
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 582737 + pending
Bug #582737 [linux-2.6] libata: disable ATAPI AN by default
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
As requested by Andrew, I did a kernel bisect and tracked the patch
which introduced the problem
due to the following commit from the linux git branch:
$ git bisect bad
f8924e770e048429ae13bfabe1ddad9bf1e64df7 is first bad commit
commit f8924e770e048429ae13bfabe1ddad9bf1e64df7
Author: Alexey Stari
* Ryan Tandy [2010-07-05 10:27]:
> A kernel oops was generated while restarting cups as part of today's
> aptitude upgrade. The oops is reproducible and occurs at each boot,
> apparently while loading parport_pc as requested by /etc/init.d/cups.
> My printer is a USB printer and has been off the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 588164 + pending
Bug #588164 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x: kernel NULL pointer
dereference while loading module parport_pc
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End o
forcemerge 586554 588140
stop
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:36:33PM +0200, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:12:32PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > wrong package, but who reads text one copies and pastes? ;)
> hmmm i did :D but i was unsure whose fault it is this time
wel
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal
A kernel oops was generated while restarting cups as part of today's
aptitude upgrade. The oops is reproducible and occurs at each boot,
apparently while loading parport_pc as requested by /etc/init.d/cups.
My printer is a USB printer and has
hello Valentin,
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, Valentin QUEQUET wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.97
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hello, Dear Maks,
>
> It's a long time since we last talked together.
he :)
> I've sorted out the bug, thought I can't explain why my system was broken in
> such
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 586554 588140
Bug#586554: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to 0.97 due to iscan*
Bug#588140: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: can't install: dpkg: error processing
linux-image-2.6-amd64
Forcibly Merged 586554 588140.
> stop
Sto
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 586554 initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to 0.97 due to
> iscan*
Bug #586554 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to
0.97
Changed Bug title to 'initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to 0.97 due
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:12:32PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> wrong package, but who reads text one copies and pastes? ;)
hmmm i did :D but i was unsure whose fault it is this time
> yep.
yes i am right to fear? or yes it will start up again? ;)
> > mkinitramfs-kpkg failed to create i
reassign 550584 flash-kernel
thanks
12:28 < tbm> bwh: I haven't followed this boot loader policy you're
working on, but it sounds like this offers a solution for #550584
right?
12:28 < tbm> so I'd have flash-kernel provide some hook script in /etc
12:46 < bwh> tbm: yes
--
Martin Michlmayr
http:/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 587608 pending
Bug #587608 [initramfs-tools] initrampf doesn't create initrd
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5876
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 587608 - moreinfo
Bug #587608 [initramfs-tools] initrampf doesn't create initrd
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 587608 important
Bug #587608 [initramfs-tools] initrampf doesn't create initrd
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 550584 flash-kernel
Bug #550584 [initramfs-tools] flash-kernel not run when going to new upstream
kernel version
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'flash-kernel'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0
Package: firmware-nonfree
Version: 0.25
Severity: wishlist
The firmware for RTL8192U as embedded in the r8192u_usb driver (and
subsequently removed) does not have a proper licence statement. We
need to get a licence for binary redistribution, as we have for the
other RTL8192 variants.
Ben.
-- S
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:52:26PM +0200, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-15
> Severity: normal
wrong package, but who reads text one copies and pastes? ;)
> Hello
>
> i have quite a fear at the moment about rebooting my comp, since i don't know
> if it will get
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 588140 moreinfo
Bug #588140 [initramfs-tools] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: can't install: dpkg:
error processing linux-image-2.6-amd64
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
58
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 588140 initramfs-tools
Bug #588140 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: can't install: dpkg: error
processing linux-image-2.6-amd64
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Bug No longer marked as found in version
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal
Hello
i have quite a fear at the moment about rebooting my comp, since i don't know
if it will get up again...
an upgrade run gives the following:
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.97) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 588097 + pending
Bug #588097 [firmware-nonfree] firmware-nonfree: Please consider adding
firmware for TI Serial devices
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stop
Alesh Slovak wrote (Mon, 5 Jul 2010):
> On 07/05/2010 09:22 AM, Brendon Higgins wrote:
> >> The "test -e" command is protected by an "&&", so a failure will not
> >> trigger an early exit and all files will be correctly removed.
> >
> > I guess you're right. But I tried the script with "exit 0" ad
On Sun, 04, Jul, 2010 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
> > m...@steerpike:~/src/linux-firmware$ ls ti_* mts_* -1
> > mts_cdma.fw
> > mts_edge.fw
> > mts_gsm.fw
>
> I actually added these already, but haven't uploaded them yet.
Being selfish for a moment, the one I need turns out to
Hi there,
The last days I got some other motherboard (some Intel, also with an
Atom CPU). Unfortunately event with the new board i still get the same
crashes. In the meanwhile I also have installed some other Nexus-S board
to ensure that the previous one was not broken.
-- Matthias
--
To UNSU
38 matches
Mail list logo
