On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > could you please review belows patch.
> > if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
>
> i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after adjusting slightly
> for newer
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> with these patchese applied, it seems to work. at least for the moment.
thank you, applied and pushed out! :)
also documented in initramfs-tools.8
happy hacking
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 02:32:43AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> > the configure_networking function relies on DEVICE being set, and
> > conf/initramfs.conf hard-codes this to eth0. though some scripts may call
> > this
> > from /scripts/local
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> could you please review belows patch.
> if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after adjusting slightly
for newer version). seems to work fine with 0.94.4.
i'd probably le
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 577149 pending
Bug #577149 [initramfs-tools] configure_networking: pxelinux BOOTIF fixes
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
looks like i missed a few things on implementing BOOTIF support properly.
somehow i managed to get the order of the mac address backwards. i know i
tested it many times, but somehow the patch i submitted got it backwards:
diff
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:48:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> > On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:52 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > > > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64
> > > > Version: 2.6.32-8~bpo50+1
From: Alexey Starikovskiy
commit dadf28a10c3eb29421837a2e413ab869ebd upstream
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy
Signed-off-by: Len Brown
[bwh: Backport to 2.6.32; same applies to 2.6.33]
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exprep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 563313 + pending
Bug #563313 [linux-2.6] lm-sensors: sensors not working after suspend
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 563313 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667
Bug #563313 [linux-2.6] lm-sensors: sensors not working after suspend
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14667'.
> thanks
Stopping proces
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 14:26 +0200, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: normal
> File: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-amd64
>
>
> I reported the following bug against fglrx-driver
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554847
>
> (fglrx
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:41 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:52 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64
> > > Version: 2.6.32-8~bpo50+1
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > I'm running a tor exit node o
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 12:24 +0200, Rainer Schwarzbach wrote:
[...]
> But I think the problem here really is a bug in the postinst script of
> linux-base:
> > Setting up linux-base (2.6.32-11) ...
> > Undefined subroutine &DebianKernel::DiskId::_system called at
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:54 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
> > > change in the of
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 16:31 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 13:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > So this is a hardware fault, isn't it?
> Nope,... unfortunately not,... going back to e.g. the default kernel and
> everything's fine :-/
I thought you said
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 19:05 +0200, jeanseb wrote:
> Hi
> here are the config file
> the *-defconfig boot, the *-debian crash just at first second.
You need to report a separate bug instead of adding to this one. It is
confused enough already, and your working config has
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x10
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:52 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[...]
> However, the change that breaks the kernel for me is in these options,
> there is no other difference.
I keep telling you that we are following the default. Apparently that
value doesn't work for your hardware.
> The physical ali
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Achim Schaefer wrote:
> No I use nouveau since a long time.
> I assume you mixed another bug report up with mine.
sorry, indeed.
> > costumers.:)
> You wrote bugzilla.kernel.org not openvz.org-)
> > let us know bug nr so that we can track it.
> Someone " solved" this bug be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 574598 http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
Bug #574598 [linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64] openvz kernel doesn't work and
spams into dmesg: NULL exec env (timr->it_process->ve_task_info.owner_env)
Set Bug forwarded-to-addres
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:24:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> Right. And it is generally able to convert references to CD drives.
> Please send the contents of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules and
> the output of 'ls -l /dev/disk/by-id'.
anth...@feynman:~$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-p
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Severity: normal
Hi! Is it possible to enable FB_I810_GTF and FB_I810_I2C in the default kernel?
This is necessary to use it on the Samsung SMT-7020S settop-box. So it would be
possible to write the I2C-Bus to set the resolution of its TV-out chip.
-- System In
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 569034 + pending
Bug #569034 {Done: maximilian attems } [src:linux-2.6]
linux-2.6: Please support sh4 architecture
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #569034 to
Am Freitag, 9. April 2010 15:44:02 schrieb maximilian attems:
> please notify upstream:
> bugzilla.openvz.org
>
> and set the forwarded to aboves bug report, thanks.
>
I think it is bug 1461
http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
But I don know how to set this.
Achim
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 13:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> So this is a hardware fault, isn't it?
Nope,... unfortunately not,... going back to e.g. the default kernel and
everything's fine :-/
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
> > change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom
> > configurati
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>
> I installed linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 (version 2.6.32-11) and
> found that it has the same problem. It worked more than one round the
> clock but then it became spams. Now I wrote this mail from this
> kernel and can do any experiments if
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:49:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > indeed those two are not related, beside beeing closed by the same
> > upload.
>
> There is long list of bug numbers in that message, but this only
> included in the subject
Hi Ben.
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration
> change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom
> configurations.
What about adding a linux-common package? Ok... is probably annyoing ;)
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:44:57PM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi Manoj, hi kernel team.
>
> May I suggest to put that manpage in the new linux-base package (and
> removing it from kernel-package)?
>
> In kernel-package generated kernel images would just have to depend on
> linux-bas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 577054 linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
Bug #577054 [acpi] acpi: After upgrade, computer does not turn off
Bug reassigned from package 'acpi' to 'linux-image-2.6.32-3-686'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions acpi/1.4-2.
> thanks
Stopping p
Hi Manoj, hi kernel team.
May I suggest to put that manpage in the new linux-base package (and
removing it from kernel-package)?
In kernel-package generated kernel images would just have to depend on
linux-base,... and so we could be sure, that everybody has that manpage.
btw: Isn't that necessa
Hi,
which files did it want to update?
I can only guess that you are thinking of the slightly unclear package
upgrade situation.
The skipped lines ([...]) only contained the notification about
automatically installed packages ("The following packages were
automatically installed and are no
Just a FYI for those noticing this bug report: There are excellent
instructions on how to build a linux-kbuild-2.6.33 package yourself on
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage#Thestoryoflinux-kbuild-2.6
Something like the attached hack is necessary due to changes in
sc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 577047 moreinfo
Bug #577047 [linux-base] device ids will be changed as follows: (blank)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 02:26 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[...]
> Here is /etc/fstab before:
>
>
> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
> #
> #
>
> proc/procproc defaults
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not relevant for stable
> tags 561203 + squeeze sid
Bug #561203 [linux-2.6] threads and fork on machine with VIPT-WB cache
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 568307 + squeeze sid
Bug #568307 [gnustep-back-common] Generates incomplete nfont bun
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:49:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> indeed those two are not related, beside beeing closed by the same
> upload.
There is long list of bug numbers in that message, but this only
included in the subject. It is confusing.
> 562847 is closed by
> "* update-initramf
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
┌───┤ Configuring linux-base ├───┐
││
│ These configuration files will be updated: │
│
38 matches
Mail list logo
