On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> I found the config change which breaks the kernel. A kernel which
> differs from the official one only in this does boot, the official
> one does not. I am quite sure there are no messages to see, this
> only affects very early stages of boot as the
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2
Severity: important
I normally use uswsusp. I recently wanted to try the kernel's built-in
hibernation support to see if it had improved. I removed uswsusp, and
tried hibernating and resuming.
As a minor issue, I noticed that the built-in hibe
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:14:26PM -0400, Justin Azoff wrote:
> I'm very glad to see that this bug is resolved and that there has been a huge
> ammount of progress made on xen in debian :-)
well i wouldn't bet on that.
it is more that nobody cared about the Lenny xen bugs.
> How should one go ab
I'm very glad to see that this bug is resolved and that there has been a huge
ammount of progress made on xen in debian :-)
How should one go about using these packages on lenny? Should one attempt to
install linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 directly in lenny, or will images be
uploaded to the archiv
On 03/07/2010 04:08 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I somewhat doubt that the network drivers load at the point the
kernel reboots. They are compiled as modules and probably not
present in the initrd at all.
However, I tried to recycle the 2.6.33-r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 565797 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10480
Bug #565797 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-686] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: EXT3-fs error
on sata SiI 3114 controller
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:06:21PM +0300, un...@debian.org wrote:
>
> I tested in my _desktop_ system: i have to have headers package to use
> nvidia drivers :(
you can test the bug on single user, no need to use xorg afais.
> also:
>
> # LANG=C dpkg -i
> tmp/linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-a
Hi, I fear this bug has been already opened in kernel.org. This is the
link of the bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10480
Until now there is no solution...
I'm very afraid
Piviul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: serious
Due to some old bug in udev, my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules
had a number of duplicate rules (timestamp on the file suggests it might
have been #374539). This leads to an error in linux-base.postinst:
Modification of non-creata
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64
>> Severity: important
>> Version: 2.6.32-10
>>
>> I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test.
>> But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg
>> messages:
>>
>> [ 482.069225] posix_timer_event: NULL exec env
>> (
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:24:18PM +0300, un...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64
> Severity: important
> Version: 2.6.32-10
>
> I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test.
> But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg
> messages:
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 574348 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578
Bug #574348 [linux-2.6] Kernel 2.6.32-9: crash
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:29:42PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:53:57PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, jida...@jidann
Hi,
I apologize for my previous post. Based on this post:
http://en.community.dell.com/forums/p/7590995/7816851.aspx, I'm (again)
almost certain that this issue is related to a laptop's manufacturer
trick to prevent damage to their components from excess heat (think of
warranty); (maybe lapto
Just FYI.
- Sedat -
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stanislaw Gruszka
Date: Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message
To: sedat.di...@gmail.com
Cc: Adel Gadllah , reinette chatre
, Greg KH ,
"linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org" ,
"John W
reported to bugzilla.kernel.org as
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15578
thanks,
Lukas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1268992407.2794
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.33-1
Hi again,
we've just seen a very similar crash on a different host with 2.6.33-1.
After the last trace, the machine crashed. I'll report this to upstream
bugzilla as well and let you know about the bugnumber.
Mar 18 20:11:22 simon kernel: [87960.628069] kswap
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64
Severity: important
Version: 2.6.32-10
I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test.
But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg
messages:
[ 482.069225] posix_timer_event: NULL exec env
(timr->it_process->ve_task_info
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:15:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 21:05 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-10
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > it looks like the following upstream commits lead to those repeated
> > messages, as so
Hi Ben,
there is patch pending in wireless-2.6 master GIT branch [1]:
commit c8406ea8fa1adde8dc5400127281d497bbcdb84a
"iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message"
Also, it would be fine to see "[2.6.32] iwlwifi: fix nfreed--" in
debian's 2.6.32 kernel.
Kind Regards,
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.kernel
*/boot/grub/grub.cfg*
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by /usr/sbin/grub-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
load_env
fi
set default="0"
if [ ${prev_saved
Sorry for not replying sooner, somehow missed your email. It seems to have
reappeared. I'm just going to blacklist the amd64_agp module for now. Here's
the oops:
Feb 9 13:25:40 riker kernel: [3.532480] Oops: [#1] SMP
Feb 9 13:25:40 riker kernel: [3.532558] last sysfs file:
/sy
22 matches
Mail list logo
