Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference? > If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e. > Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional.

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference? If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e. Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional. I agree with Kel here, git2cl et al are unimportant details. Kel

Bug#537879: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64/686: reloads b43-phy0

2010-03-01 Thread Andres Cimmarusti
Hi, I've already tried the new 2.6.32 kernel and it works well. Actually the 2.6.27 kernel was already fixed (after a few .x updates). However the problem was also present in Network-Manager in lenny, but this is fixed in the version I found in lenny-backports. It's definitely fixed in Squeeze...b

Processed: tagging 570229

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 570229 - pending Bug #570229 [linux-2.6] udev: [drm:drm_fill_in_dev] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: tagging 570229

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 570229 - patch Bug #570229 [linux-2.6] udev: [drm:drm_fill_in_dev] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #570229 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: tagging 560033

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 560033 + pending Bug #560033 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: drm/i915 video overlay 2.6.32 backport Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#537879: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64/686: reloads b43-phy0

2010-03-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:21:19AM -0400, Andres Cimmarusti wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 > Version: 2.6.26-17 > Severity: normal > > This doesn't happen everytime, but it happens often. My wireless device > is based on a broadcom 4318 as can be evidenced below. When I boot, the >

Bug#533276: adding parm to mount.cifs

2010-03-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 01:55:45PM +0200, pouc...@peewiki.net wrote: > > > I've found the answer. > > When enabling mount.cifs debug mode (echo 3 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI), we > can see errors in the dmesg output : > > # dmesg > [ 7845.389949] fs/cifs/xattr.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_getxattr as Xid

Bug#533180: linux-image-amd64: page allocation failure within kernel swapper

2010-03-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:51:45PM +0300, Giorgos Mavrikas wrote: > Package: linux-image-amd64 > Version: 2.6.26-2 > Severity: normal > > I run a standard amd64 kernel in a core 2 duo machine under heavy network > traffic, and I keep getting tons of these (more than 28 in less that 2 days) > the

Bug#533276: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: mount.cifs : option dir_mode not apply in mount point)

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:55:33 +0100 with message-id <20100301225533.ga18...@galadriel.inutil.org> and subject line Bounces has caused the Debian Bug report #533276, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: mount.cifs : option dir_mode not apply in mount point to be marked as done.

Bug#532906: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: Unable to handle kernel paging request

2010-03-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 01:23:17AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:24 -0400, Arnout Boelens wrote: > > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 > > Version: 2.6.26-15lenny3 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Every once I a while I get kernel oops on one of my computers and find th

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread Kel Modderman
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > > >> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to > >> do something in his scripts that create th

Processed: tagging 509156

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 509156 + pending Bug #509156 [linux-2.6] kernel debian/rules misses patch instructions and target Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#510439: marked as done (linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl4965)

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:22:08 +0100 with message-id <2010030108.ga3...@galadriel.inutil.org> and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl4965 has caused the Debian Bug report #510439, regarding linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl49

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kel Modderman wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: >> > >> >> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs.  Perhaps we could ask

Bug#492581: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: Does not halt an EeePC 701)

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:01:45 +0100 with message-id <20100301220145.gb28...@inutil.org> and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: Does not halt an EeePC 701 has caused the Debian Bug report #492581, regarding linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: Does not halt an EeePC 701 to be marked as do

Bug#494913: marked as done (Suspend-to-RAM resume fails after undocking)

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:01:40 +0100 with message-id <20100301220140.ga28...@inutil.org> and subject line Re: Suspend-to-RAM resume fails after undocking has caused the Debian Bug report #494913, regarding Suspend-to-RAM resume fails after undocking to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#510439: linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl4965

2010-03-01 Thread Kristof Provost
On 2010-02-21 23:21:47 (+0100), Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 09:13:07PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote: > > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 > > Version: 2.6.26+17 > > Severity: normal > > > > Doing 'ifconfig wlan0 up', where wlan0 is an iwl4965 interface > > sometimes causes a

Bug#572125: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.2-amd64: btusb error message (failed to resubmit) after suspend/hibernate or on battery with usb auto-suspend

2010-03-01 Thread giggz
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-8~bpo50+1 Severity: normal Hi, I'm running on debian stable lenny + Backports on a eeepc 1201n. I have problem with bluetooth, particularly the btusb module : on battery (usb auto-suspend is activated) or when I return from suspend/hibernate, I get these error

Bug#572123: linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64: loading fschmd module reboots the machine

2010-03-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2 Severity: normal Hi, something is broken with the fschmd module in 2.6.33, once the module is loaded the machine reboots immediately. Also on the serial console there is no output from the module except for (sometimes) a timestamp starting a tru

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > >> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs.  Perhaps we could ask Johannes to >> do something in his scripts that create them?  Beyond that I don't >> see much point in checking-in a ChangeLog

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2010-03-01 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #570229 (http://bugs.debian.org/570229) # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread John W. Linville
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:43:46PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > I'd suggest that 'make dist' should include a ChangeLog file in the > >> > tarball, generated with git2cl or git log or whatever. A NEWS file > >> > summarising the user-visible changes in each version would also be a > >> >

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

2010-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to > do something in his scripts that create them? Beyond that I don't > see much point in checking-in a ChangeLog. It definitely shouldn't be checked into git, but rath

Processed: Re: Bug#572084: linux-image-2.6.32-2-orion5x: NFS kernel daemon support disabled?

2010-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 572084 nfs-kernel-server Bug #572084 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-2-orion5x: NFS kernel daemon support disabled? Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'nfs-kernel-server'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-8. > forc

Bug#572084: linux-image-2.6.32-2-orion5x: NFS kernel daemon support disabled?

2010-03-01 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:18:42PM +0100, Marco van Zwetselaar wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-8 > Severity: normal > > After upgrading its kernel from 2.6.30-2-orion5x to 2.6.32-2-orion5x, I > cannot mount NFS v4 filesystems exported by my QNAP-409. When attempting > to restart nfs-

Bug#572084: linux-image-2.6.32-2-orion5x: NFS kernel daemon support disabled?

2010-03-01 Thread Bastian Blank
reassign 572084 nfs-kernel-server forcemerge 550153 572084 thanks On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:18:42PM +0100, Marco van Zwetselaar wrote: > After upgrading its kernel from 2.6.30-2-orion5x to 2.6.32-2-orion5x, I > cannot mount NFS v4 filesystems exported by my QNAP-409. When attempting > to restart

Bug#569892: bios update helped

2010-03-01 Thread Stefan Völkel
I just flashed the BIOS on my NC10 to the latest available version (11CA) from: http://www.samsungpc.com/08/products/nc10/firmware.html#firmware using a freedos usb stick, see: http://smorgasbord.gavagai.nl/2009/05/flash-your-samsung-nc10-bios-from-linux/ not xbacklight works again. -- To UN

Bug#572084: linux-image-2.6.32-2-orion5x: NFS kernel daemon support disabled?

2010-03-01 Thread Marco van Zwetselaar
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-8 Severity: normal After upgrading its kernel from 2.6.30-2-orion5x to 2.6.32-2-orion5x, I cannot mount NFS v4 filesystems exported by my QNAP-409. When attempting to restart nfs-kernel-server, I get the warning "Not starting NFS kernel daemon: no support in curr

Bug#571305: Swarm does not boot on .32 anymore.

2010-03-01 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Martin Michlmayr | 2010-02-26 07:47:30 [-0500]: >* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [2010-02-26 08:50]: >> > can you get Ralf or David Daney to submit it for inclusion into >> > the 2.6.32-stable series? >> It is allready there [0]. >> >> [0] >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ralf/linux.g

Bug#516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2010-03-01 Thread David Miller
From: Hermann Lauer Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 12:30:05 +0100 > What can be done to debug this further ? Nothing really, I just simply have no time to look into it with all the other things on my plate, sorry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Bug#572067: linux-libc-dev: Can not install, file conflict with libdrm

2010-03-01 Thread Jens-Michael Hoffmann
Package: linux-libc-dev Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2 Severity: normal When trying to install linux-libc-dev from experimental, dpkg shows the following error message: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.33-1~experimental.2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to over

Bug#516785: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R cassini network driver kernel panic

2010-03-01 Thread Hermann Lauer
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 09:29:25AM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote: > I tried again with vanilla 2.6.32 (2.6.27-2.6.31 are unusable due to a kernel > memory corruption bug), the driver is still crashing my Sunfire V480R. Tried today vanilla 2.6.33, then did a: # modprobe -v cassini cassini_debug=-1 in

Bug#570490: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64: cannot unload radeon with KMS enabled

2010-03-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 09:31:52 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 26 February 2010 17:23, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:54:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:56:53 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >> > >> > When kms is enabled the radeon

Re: failure to remove+purge debian package generated by make deb-pkg

2010-03-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 01 March 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > It's already fixed in 072ad3179c526b90b57719e127de851182b04c4c[1] == > 0.93.4-16-g02cb277. > > Should I report the problem anyhow? That would seem rather pointless. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: failure to remove+purge debian package generated by make deb-pkg

2010-03-01 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, > I did some research and I concluded it's the fault of > /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools. I think it should have the > following lines: > > # skip on purge > [ "$DEB_MAINT_PARAMS" = "remove" ] || exit 0 > > I will report a bug against initramfs-tools. It's already fixed

Bug#550665: Info received (Bug#550665: Info received (Bug#550665: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64: ALSA: When i use a kernel most newer than 2.6.26 alsamixer section "Capture" is empty with the exception

2010-03-01 Thread kiroken
ok thanks for the help. You can close the bug on 2.6.33 capture and digital channel come back :) There is still some channel missing but sincerely i don't have any ideas of what they do and if they are important for some users. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.o

Bug#570490: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64: cannot unload radeon with KMS enabled

2010-03-01 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 26 February 2010 17:23, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:54:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:56:53 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> >> > When kms is enabled the radeon module cannot be unloaded. rmmod >> > complains that the module is busy wh