Hi Moritz,
Sorry for not seeing your message earlier. Actually I have not been checking
this email address any more but just happen to log in.
> Does this error still occur with the 2.6.30 kernel from unstable?
I had to disable the following option in 2.6.28-1-486 in order to get rid of
the er
also sprach Gabor Gombas [2010.01.30.1131 +1300]:
> IMHO you are confused: /proc/sys/kernel/domainname is the NIS
> domain name and has nothing to do with DNS; in fact, the NIS
> domain can be different from the DNS domain. Thus your script is
> doubly wrong: on a NIS system hostnames are normally
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 567591 moreinfo
Bug #567591 [linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64:
kernel package should conflict with lvm2 package from Lenny
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 12:40 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: normal
>
> I have just done an upgrade from Lenny to Testing.
>
> When I ran "apt-get dist-upgrade" it aborted because it tried to upgrade udev
> first and the kernel
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Exactly, this is already taken care of upstream with OpenSSL. The
> default directory is /etc/wireless-regdb/pubkeys/
Excellent.
> Patches for this are welcomed upstream on CRDA. Is this a requirement
> for Debian to package CRDA?
No
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: normal
I have just done an upgrade from Lenny to Testing.
When I ran "apt-get dist-upgrade" it aborted because it tried to upgrade udev
first and the kernel wasn't new enough. So I ran "apt-get install
linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-a
On 01/29/10 14:57, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
diff -U0 /tmp/BUG-HUNTING /tmp/BUG-HUNTING.new
--- /tmp/BUG-HUNTING2009-12-03 11:51:21.0 +0800
+++ /tmp/BUG-HUNTING.new2009-12-20 12:45:37.783783055 +0800
@@ -27 +27 @@
-Before you submit a bug report read REPORTING-BUGS.
+Before y
RD> That may be a correct change, but your patch needs a
RD> "Signed-off-by:" line and correct file names and directory levels
RD> before it can be applied. Please resend with corrections.
That is nice however I just tried to help and I don't want to get
involved deeper. I hereby authorize you all
Hi,
IMHO you are confused: /proc/sys/kernel/domainname is the NIS domain name
and has nothing to do with DNS; in fact, the NIS domain can be different
from the DNS domain. Thus your script is doubly wrong: on a NIS system
hostnames are normally not qualified so you cannot obtain the NIS domain
fro
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 02:53:47PM +0200, min...@esdebian.org wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.30-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> rt2870sta module has stopped working correctly after updating kernel from
> 2.6.29 (version 2.6.29-5, which works without issues) to 2.6.3
On 29/01/2010 23:42, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:04:37AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
>> Version: 2.6.30-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> trying the 2.6.30-1-amd64 package, it seems to have problems with wireless
>> stuff. It
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:15:42AM -0700, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686
> Version: 2.6.30-1
> Severity: normal
>
> am using Debian 5.0 with 2.6.30 kernel. I see the following messages during
> kernel boot. Here is the relevant dmesg output:
>
> [ 4.368333] ata1.00: e
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:48:54AM +0800, Jos van Wolput wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 (2.6.30-1, Sid)
> System: Debian/sid, KMS enabled (module i915 modeset=1 loaded)
> Processor: Intel Pentium M 1.70 GHz
> Chipset: 852GM/855GM
> Severity: important
>
> After upgrading the kernel-ima
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:02:42AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.30-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
>
> Starting at boot, my floppy drive makes a periodic muffled clicking
> sound, each click apparently accompanied by a kernel error message.
> There is n
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:04:37AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.30-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> trying the 2.6.30-1-amd64 package, it seems to have problems with wireless
> stuff. It works fine on 2.6.29-2-amd64, but with 2.6.30-1-amd64,
diff -U0 /tmp/BUG-HUNTING /tmp/BUG-HUNTING.new
--- /tmp/BUG-HUNTING2009-12-03 11:51:21.0 +0800
+++ /tmp/BUG-HUNTING.new2009-12-20 12:45:37.783783055 +0800
@@ -27 +27 @@
-Before you submit a bug report read REPORTING-BUGS.
+Before you submit a bug report read ../REPORTING-BUGS.
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-doc-2.6.32
> Version: 2.6.32-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> diff -U0 /tmp/BUG-HUNTING /tmp/BUG-HUNTING.new
> --- /tmp/BUG-HUNTING 2009-12-03 11:51:21.0 +0800
> +++ /tmp/BUG-HUNTING.new 2009-12-20 12:45:37.783783055 +0800
> @@ -27
tags 457652 wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:30:37PM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A quick note for those willing to play with lguest...
>
> I have been playing with lguest a little bit, for the fun. I don't
> believe that the lguest sample user land tools is worth being shi
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:52:43 +0100
with message-id <20100129225243.ga5...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6-686: invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
has caused the Debian Bug report #512647,
regarding oops in free_block called by dm_snapshot
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:39:09 +0100
with message-id <20100129223909.ga3...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.29-2-686: GSPCA V4L2 dropped support for
in 2.6.26 supported webcams - Metabug
has caused the Debian Bug report #532474,
regarding linux-image-2.6.29
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 532835 moreinfo
Bug #532835 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.30-trunk-686 snapshot.13778: black
screen
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 457652 wontfix
Bug #457652 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Please package lguest launcher
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:37:49 +0100
with message-id <20100129223749.gd21...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: No support for Fintek F71862FG Super IO Sensors in linux
2.6.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #526846,
regarding No support for Fintek F71862FG Super IO Sensors in linux 2
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:37:35 +0100
with message-id <20100129223735.gc21...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: emacs23 has built
has caused the Debian Bug report #561332,
regarding Vfork bug on hppa => FTBS emacs 23
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
> You can build a package from svn with the following commands:
>
Thanks for the instructions, but I'd just about managed to find the svn,
and cobble together something similar a few hours before your email to
get some 2.6.26-22 packages built. Seems good so-far - I'm leaving the
machine doin
also sprach Marco d'Itri [2010.01.30.0839 +1300]:
> > > What happens if the hostname is changed but the initramfs is not
> > > rebuilt?
> > How likely is that to happen? How likely is it to happen that the
> > hostname is changed, an array built (thus carrying the new
> > hostname), and the initra
On Jan 29, martin f krafft wrote:
> > What happens if the hostname is changed but the initramfs is not
> > rebuilt?
> How likely is that to happen? How likely is it to happen that the
> hostname is changed, an array built (thus carrying the new
> hostname), and the initramfs not rebuilt?
It looks
also sprach Marco d'Itri [2010.01.30.0233 +1300]:
> > mdadm in incremental mode needs the hostname to be able to work
> > without a configuration file, which would make RAID-boot much
> > more robust. Instead of mdadm touching
> > /proc/sys/kernel/{host,domain}name, it feels like initramfs
> > sho
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Please keep me in CC for this thread]
>
> There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for
> the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that
> maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload (but still
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:34:27AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Is this reproducible if you plug the adapter into a PC?
I'll try it and see.
--
Devin \ aqua(at)devin.com, IRC:Requiem; http://www.devin.com
Carraway \ 1024D/E9ABFCD2: 13E7 199E DD1E 65F0 8905 2E43 5395 CA0D E9AB FCD2
--
To U
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:31:47PM +, Alter Ego wrote:
> Thank you for your explanation.
>
> Please, don't get me wrong. I accept your explanation and I thank you
> for your reply.
>
> But don't you think that 32 MB just for enabling DRI is too much??
If this additional memory can be swapped
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When there is too little space on /tmp (such as when overflow tmp is
mounted by initscripts) and an initramfs update is triggered (such as by
upgrading udev) initramfs-tools not only fails to build a
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:23:13 +0100
with message-id <20100129172313.gp9...@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#567357: initramfs-tools: after installing new kernel
does normal boot instead of resume
has caused the Debian Bug report #567357,
regarding initramfs-tools: after in
On 29/01/2010, maximilian attems wrote:
> reassign 567357 linux-2.6
> stop
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> >
> > This is a regression since I recall initramfs stopping when the resume
> > would fail.
> >
> > However, after installing the 2.6.32 Debian kernel the box wo
reassign 567357 linux-2.6
stop
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> This is a regression since I recall initramfs stopping when the resume
> would fail.
>
> However, after installing the 2.6.32 Debian kernel the box would not
> resume with the old kernle nor stop when resuming is not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 567357 linux-2.6
Bug #567357 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: after installing new kernel does
normal boot instead of resume
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions initra
Thank you for your explanation.
Please, don't get me wrong. I accept your explanation and I thank you
for your reply.
But don't you think that 32 MB just for enabling DRI is too much??
Don't you think the huge icrease in used memory (more 32 MB) is a
symptom that something is very wrong with
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:25:47PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> Of FUNCTION_TRACER, Kconfig says:
> If it's runtime disabled
>(the bootup default), then the overhead of the instructions is very
> small and not measurable even in micro-benchmarks.
>
> And for STACK_TRACER:
> If this i
On Jan 29, martin f krafft wrote:
> mdadm in incremental mode needs the hostname to be able to work
> without a configuration file, which would make RAID-boot much more
> robust. Instead of mdadm touching
> /proc/sys/kernel/{host,domain}name, it feels like initramfs should
> do that.
What happens
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: wishlist
mdadm in incremental mode needs the hostname to be able to work
without a configuration file, which would make RAID-boot much more
robust. Instead of mdadm touching
/proc/sys/kernel/{host,domain}name, it feels like initramfs should
do tha
40 matches
Mail list logo
