Ben (et al):
Your patch (with Stefan's addition, replacing dev->name with "r8169") also
worked
for me on an Intel i7 920 system (amd64) running unstable (w/o the firmware).
Dec 20 18:39:08 octane kernel: [1.100454] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver
2.3LK-NAPI loaded
Dec 20 18:39:08 octane kerne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 557262 linux-2.6
Bug #557262 [asterisk] 2.6.31+2.6.31.4: XFS - All I/O locks up to D-state after
24-48 hours (sysrq-t+w available) - root cause found = asterisk
Bug reassigned from package 'asterisk' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked
Your message dated Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:50:22 +0100
with message-id <20091221035022.ga17...@bongo.bofh.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#561764: some warnings fly off screen and are not saved
in any file
has caused the Debian Bug report #561764,
regarding some warnings fly off screen and are not saved i
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-2
Severity: normal
The machine had an uptime of 5 days. Had been suspended (STR) and
resumed many times. Today morning, I tried to preview a half-downloaded
torrent file, which led in too much of disk I/O taking place.
This led to the following ata reset followed
BH> These messages remain in the kernel log buffer and should be copied
BH> by the log daemon later.
Ah ha, I can reproduce the messages via
/etc/init.d/udev restart
and indeed they also end up in the /var/log/ files.
(They are complaining about some things in /etc/udev/rules.d/*, but that
is bes
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 09:32 -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
[...]
> Found some time before work this morning. Find the last series of
> messages attached, including the kernel oops. I had to manually type
> this, so I apologize in advance for typos -- I did try to make
> corrections before rebooti
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 00:52 -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
> Version: 0.22
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Ben, your patch works for me. Will this be made part of the Debian
> 2.6.32 kernel, or were you merely experimenting? (It would really help
> if the KT used this, u
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 09:54 +0100, samuel wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.31-2
> Severity: important
> File: linux
>
> Since i upgraded to 2.6.31 (and 2.6.32) my wireless no longer succeeds in
> connecting to my AP.
> Symptons are diverse:
> * i can connect but get disconnected immedi
Forwarded Message
From: Mikko Rapeli
To: Debian kernel team
Subject: Re: lenny kernel memory leak?
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:46:01 +0200
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:05:08AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Since then I have switched system shell from bash to dash, shut down a few
>
Forwarded Message
From: Mikko Rapeli
To: Debian kernel team
Subject: Re: lenny kernel memory leak?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:56:27 +0200
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:03:12PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I'm not aware of such a bug, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> Pleas
Forwarded Message
From: Mikko Rapeli
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Debian kernel team
Subject: Re: lenny kernel memory leak?
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:05:08 +0200
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:41:16AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Did you see any repeated error messages in the kernel log
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 561890 Mikko Rapeli
Bug #561890 [linux-2.6] lenny kernel memory leak?
Changed Bug submitter to 'Mikko Rapeli ' from 'Ben
Hutchings '
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Forwarded Message
From: Mikko Rapeli
To: Debian kernel team
Subject: Re: lenny kernel memory leak?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:53:35 +0200
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:30:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Try c95edf5432f097c926dd3f59239ecde80da3b214 "rt2x00: Properly clean up
> be
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 09:24 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> >> > OSS
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > This has been a deprecated kernel interface for some time and will be
> >> > disabled for squeeze
> >
> > Done.
> >
> >> > with mechanisms put in plac
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-19lenny2
Severity: important
Forwarded Message
From: Mikko Rapeli
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: lenny kernel memory leak?
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:36:56 +0200
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel
(maybe debian-kernel is a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 561309 + pending
Bug #561309 [linux-2.6] firmware-linux-nonfree: needs firmware for module r8169
(/rtl8168d-{1, 2}.fw)
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopp
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > OSS
>> > ---
>> >
>> > This has been a deprecated kernel interface for some time and will be
>> > disabled for squeeze
>
> Done.
>
>> > with mechanisms put in place to deal with legacy users.
>
> Er, not sure.
I guess oss4-dkms will be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Should not be a hard dependency in the driver
> reassign 561309 linux-2.6 2.6.32~rc8-1~experimental.1
Bug #561309 [firmware-linux-nonfree] firmware-linux-nonfree: needs firmware for
module r8169 (/rtl8168d-{1, 2}.fw)
Bug reassigned from package
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:35 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> thanks for the response.
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:12:44AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 15:46 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6-parisc64
> >
> > Yes but which version?
> >
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 561880 linux-2.6 2.6.32-1
Bug #561880 [linux-image-2.6-parisc64] inotify/hppa: Not assigning sequential
ids as expected
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6-parisc64' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug #561880 [linux-2.6] inotify/hppa: Not assi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 561880 inotify/hppa: Not assigning sequential ids as expected
Bug #561880 [linux-image-2.6-parisc64] linux-image-2.6-parisc64:
inotify_add_watch does not give a unique watch descriptor
Changed Bug title to 'inotify/hppa: Not assigning seq
Hi Ben,
thanks for the response.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:12:44AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 15:46 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6-parisc64
>
> Yes but which version?
>
the version that paer is running (apparently
linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-paris
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 15:46 -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-parisc64
Yes but which version?
> Severity: important
> Blocks: 558981
>
> The attatched minimal test case shows these results:
>
> on my i386 machine, it correctly gives two different numbers:
> $ gcc test.c; ./a.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 550665 2.6.32-1
Bug#550665: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64: ALSA: When i use a kernel most newer
than 2.6.26 alsamixer section "Capture" is empty with the exception of the
presence of the "Digital" channel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 00:08 +0100, kiroken wrote:
[...]
> I try with .32 kernel and with that the situation sounds better. No
> "new" channel appear but i can record with the "digital" one.
>
> There is another issue anyway the volume is too low. I can just hear
> my voice, as if it were far, only
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 558981 by 561880
Bug #558981 [inotify-tools] FTBFS [hppa] - Test 'basic_watch_info' failed
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 558981: 561880
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Package: linux-image-2.6-parisc64
Severity: important
Blocks: 558981
The attatched minimal test case shows these results:
on my i386 machine, it correctly gives two different numbers:
$ gcc test.c; ./a.out
First: 1
Second: 2
however on paer.debian.org (hppa):
$ gcc test.c; ./a.out
First: 1
Secon
> Hi,
> The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based
> on 2.6.32. Please test the current 2.6.32 from unstable and tell
> us whether the problem persists. If so, we should report it upstream
> to the kernel.org developers.
>
> The 2.6.32 kernel is available from packages.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:30:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Try c95edf5432f097c926dd3f59239ecde80da3b214 "rt2x00: Properly clean up
> beacon skbs."
With this I got kernel panics at boot when loading the modules. Maybe it
depends on some other patches.
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kerne
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 21:59 +0100, Nicolas DEGAND wrote:
> I have been able to get that (crappy) picture. Hope this helps.
Sorry, no, we need to know the task names. Try adding the parameter
"vga=6" to the kernel command line; this should fit more lines on the
screen.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Onc
On 12/20/2009 02:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Only some drivers (and none before kernel version 2.6.31) currently
set these flags. When the flags are equal to 0 and so we don't know
what the link partner advertised, don't report anything.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
ethtool.c |4 +++-
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 04:07 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> BH> Early kernel messages should be copied into /var/log/messages by the log
> BH> daemon. Maybe you need to turn up the log level. If you think this is
> BH> not a configuration error, pleas
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
BH> Early kernel messages should be copied into /var/log/messages by the log
BH> daemon. Maybe you need to turn up the log level. If you think this is
BH> not a configuration error, please reassign to the log daemon's package
BH> (rsyslog is the default).
Al
On 12/20/2009 11:39 AM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
OK, via
$ zcat /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-686|strings|less
I think I found one of the messages I saw:
SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version
which is in /sbin/udevadm ... bug #561229 perhaps.
However, what I'm saying is "how bad it
Hello,
whatever you do to resolve this bug or non-bug, just make it visible to
the user. I just wasted some time to debug this problem (or maybe not a
real problem, haven't figured that out yet). Anyhow, please print a
proper message and write a sane rationale into
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs
things were smooth prior to major sid package update last week, have been down
since, seems very similar to the bug #550320 filed in October. Unfortunately
don't have a second Debian machine to fix (or file bugs from)
[] Freeing unused kernel memory: 560k freed
[] Write protectin
notfound 557720 2.6.32-2
thanks
The build does not fail on powerpc in 2.6.32-2.
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Only some drivers (and none before kernel version 2.6.31) currently
set these flags. When the flags are equal to 0 and so we don't know
what the link partner advertised, don't report anything.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
ethtool.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 557720 2.6.32-2
Bug #557720 [linux-2.6] FTBFS on powerpc: undefined reference to
`.unmask_msi_irq'
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-2' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for versio
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:36 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:54:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It also ways:
> > > Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: No
> > > Auto-negotiation: on
> > >
> > > Those also seem to conflict and it really should adve
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:54:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It also ways:
> > Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: No
> > Auto-negotiation: on
> >
> > Those also seem to conflict and it really should advertise it.
> [...]
>
> No, "Auto-negotiation: on" does not mean au
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 01:39 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> OK, via
> $ zcat /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-686|strings|less
> I think I found one of the messages I saw:
> SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version
> which is in /sbin/udevadm ... bug #561229 perhaps.
>
> However, what I'
Hi,
what's the opinion on merging DRBD into the Squeeze kernel? DRBD is
proven, popular technology and now that is has been accepted into
2.6.33 I'd like to merge it into the Squeeze kernel so that it's
available out of the box.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-r
OK, via
$ zcat /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-686|strings|less
I think I found one of the messages I saw:
SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version
which is in /sbin/udevadm ... bug #561229 perhaps.
However, what I'm saying is "how bad it is that there be any messages
that fly off the scree
I'd like to pull nouveau from 2.6.33 into Debian's 2.6.32. I'm hoping
this would allow for replacement of nv and its dodgy source with nouveau
(I realise nouveau has its own issues with non-free bits, but they're
more easily separable). Does this sound like a good idea?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
O
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 17:27 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-2
>
> Hi,
>
> I get this:
> # ethtool eth0 |grep -i pause
> Advertised pause frame use: No
> Link partner advertised pause frame use: No
> # ethtool -a eth0
> Pause parameters for eth0:
> A
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 05:27:33PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On the other hand, mii-tool reports this:
> # mii-tool -v
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
> product info: Yukon 88E1011 rev 5
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: autonegotiation complete,
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 17:22 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we have a 2.6.32 kernel in unstable, can you updates us
> on the various things mentioned in this mail?
>
> For instance, as I understand it, most other distro's recently
> had a release with a 2.6.31 kernel?
Fedora 12, Ubu
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-2
Hi,
I get this:
# ethtool eth0 |grep -i pause
Advertised pause frame use: No
Link partner advertised pause frame use: No
# ethtool -a eth0
Pause parameters for eth0:
Autonegotiate: on
RX: on
TX: on
Those seem to conflic
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 10:46 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:05:08AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > Since then I have switched system shell from bash to dash, shut down a few
> > non-essential services and mounted all fs with noatime. These have helped a
> > bit but I still s
Hi,
Now that we have a 2.6.32 kernel in unstable, can you updates us
on the various things mentioned in this mail?
For instance, as I understand it, most other distro's recently
had a release with a 2.6.31 kernel? Do you know if there are
plans to have a kernel with backported drivers, one used
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:01:50AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:40:45PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.22-6
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found this message today:
> > rsync: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
> >
> > Call Trac
My Name is Cynthia I am average in height and fair in complexion ,am a loving,
romantic and caring angel. In my searching for friend today and i came across
your email in my Google search after going through it. then i decided to
contact you. I really want to have a good relationship with you. B
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-2
Severity: important
File: linux
Since i upgraded to 2.6.31 (and 2.6.32) my wireless no longer succeeds in
connecting to my AP.
Symptons are diverse:
* i can connect but get disconnected immediately after which scanning starts
again
* wicd can't start scannin
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:05:08AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Since then I have switched system shell from bash to dash, shut down a few
> non-essential services and mounted all fs with noatime. These have helped a
> bit but I still see slab growing about 1 mb in day.
>
> $ uptime
> 08:01:02 up
55 matches
Mail list logo
