On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:41:16AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Did you see any repeated error messages in the kernel log?
Yes, rt2500 related debug messages which I'm unable to turn off:
[235548.961171] wlan0: Selected IBSS BSSID 02:0c:f1:46:6a:78 based on
configured SSID
[235548.961265] wlan0
linux-latest-2.6_23_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-latest-2.6_23.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_23.tar.gz
linux-image-486_2.6.32+23_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6-486_2.6.32+23_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-486_2.6.32+23_i386.deb
linux-image-686_2.6.32+23_i386
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560263: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #560263,
regarding postinst crashes if current kernel has no /proc/modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#559755: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #559755,
regarding Disable cryptoloop
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558200: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #558200,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Please enable Kernel SamePage Merging
(CONFIG_KSM)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558200: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #558200,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: Please, enable CONFIG_KSM in 2.6.32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556587: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556587,
regarding linux-image-2.6.31-1-686-bigmem: nf_conntrack sets wrong value for
ctorigsrc parameter
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:07:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#559577: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #559577,
regarding atl1c: hangs when NIC link goes down
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
linux-2.6_2.6.32-2_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-2.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-2.diff.gz
linux-support-2.6.32-trunk_2.6.32-2_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-2_all.deb
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-2_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.32_2.6
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558023: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #558023,
regarding firmware-linux-nonfree: please, include radeon/RV635_pfp.bin firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558033: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #558033,
regarding firmware-linux-nonfree: debian/copyright vague about upstream
location
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#553710: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #553710,
regarding firmware-linux-nonfree: Package description doesn't include Tigon
firmware.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#558023: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #558023,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: firmware for radeon rv630 in wrong
format ?
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560065: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #560065,
regarding [firmware-bnx2] needs an update for 2.6.32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-2.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-2.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:26:00, the files will
firmware-nonfree_0.22_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.22.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.22.tar.gz
firmware-linux_0.22_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.22_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.22_all.deb
firmware-intelwimax_0.22_all.deb
firmware-ipw2x00_0.22
Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 11:49 -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
When 2.6.32-truck (AMD64 here) was released, I tried switching to that
for my Debian backup kernel... but it hangs in boot, with some very
nasty backtracing. It does print the warning about missing firmware,
but the bo
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 08:56 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:03:12PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm not aware of such a bug, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> > Please note that the rt2500 driver is not part of the kernel package,
> > which instead provides the r
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:33 +0100, Victor Pablos Ceruelo wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-bpo.2-686
> Version: 2.6.30-8~bpo50+2
> Followup-For: Bug #528362
>
>
> > Are you changing the MTU of the r8169 device (jumbo frames)?
> No.
>
> > Do you have wake-on-LAN enabled?
> No.
>
> > If you ad
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 11:49 -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
[...]
> May I provide evidence to the contrary?
>
> I compile my own kernels, and use them exclusively unless some problem
> arises which forces me to use another kernel. Therefore, I keep a stock
> Debian kernel installed and available via
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 535006 linux-2.6 2.6.30-1
Bug #535006 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: errors in dmesg
Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-kernel-server' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.1.2-6lenny1.
Bug #535006
After upgrading the buildds to 2.6.32, emacs23 builds fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:30:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:10:15AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree
> > > tonight.
> > > There sho
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:10:15AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree tonight.
> > There should be no new binary packages for linux-2.6. Any objections?
>
> No objectio
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree tonight.
> There should be no new binary packages for linux-2.6. Any objections?
No objections here. Micah and I have been working w/ vserver upstream
and have a pa
I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree tonight.
There should be no new binary packages for linux-2.6. Any objections?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ..
Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Version: 0.21
Severity: normal
> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 10:11 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
> > Version: 0.21
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > Installing the new kernel package "linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64"
> > results in new warn
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> reassign 561348 firmware-linux-nonfree 0.21
Bug #561348 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: firmware for radeon rv630
in wrong format ?
Bug reassigned from package
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:45:52PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:15:53PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40:42AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > >> Package: linux-2.6
> > > Pl
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:15:53PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40:42AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >> Package: linux-2.6
> > Please use reportbug to add proper information from the machine in
> > ques
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> severity 561332 important
> tags 561332 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40:42AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>
> Please use reportbug to add proper information from the machine in
> question.
I have
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:14:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> severity 561332 important
> tags 561332 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40:42AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
>
> Please use reportbug to add proper information from the machine in
> questio
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-1
Severity: important
Hi,
linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 needs some firmware files for radeon named
RV620_pfp.bin and RV620_me.bin, whereas the files provided by the
firmware-linux-nonfree package contain only RV620_cp.bin.
It looks like it's in a different forma
severity 561332 important
tags 561332 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40:42AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
Please use reportbug to add proper information from the machine in
question.
> severity: serious
hppa is no release architecture.
> This bug block emacs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 561332 important
Bug #561332 [linux-2.6] Vfork bug on hppa => FTBS emacs 23
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags 561332 moreinfo
Bug #561332 [linux-2.6] Vfork bug on hppa => FTBS emacs 23
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stop
Package: linux-2.6
severity: serious
block: 558905
forwarded: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/2403
This bug block emacs since one month. Please correct. See
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/2403 for a testcase.
Thank you
Regards
Bastien (An emacs user irratati
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 558905 by 561332
Bug #558905 [emacs23] FTBFS [hppa] - Doing vfork: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 558905: 561332
> forwarded 561332 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/2403
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-bpo.2-686
Version: 2.6.30-8~bpo50+2
Followup-For: Bug #528362
> Are you changing the MTU of the r8169 device (jumbo frames)?
No.
> Do you have wake-on-LAN enabled?
No.
> If you add 'pci=nomsi' to the kernel command line, does this make a
> difference?
I added it (you
38 matches
Mail list logo
